Xuzhou Medical University Affiliated Suqian Hospital
Suqian, Jiangsu, 223800, China
NCT Number: NCT07197411
observational study The purpose of this observational study is to clarify the consistency, accuracy, and reproducibility of portable patch carotid ultrasound (CADFlow) compared to desktop ultrasound machines in detecting cardiac output (CO), peak velocity (Vmax), and minimum velocity (Vmin) in healthy volunteers.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year–79 year
All sexes
Observational
Suqian, Jiangsu, 223800, China
Parameters including cardiac output (CO), peak carotid artery velocity (Vmax), and minimum velocity (Vmin) were monitored in healthy subjects using a portable patch-type carotid ultrasound device (CADFlow). The subjects were placed in a supine position with the head rotated 30° to the contralateral side and the neck slightly extended. The dual-patch probe was then attached to the sites of the most prominent bilateral carotid artery pulsations. The automatic measurement mode was initiated to record blood flow waveforms for 60 seconds. After 30 minutes, the same subjects underwent reassessment of the aforementioned parameters using a conventional ultrasound system. The distal internal diameters of the bilateral common carotid arteries were measured in two-dimensional mode (mean of three measurements). Using pulsed-wave Doppler with an insonation angle ≤60°, Vmax and Vmin were recorded over three consecutive cardiac cycles. The probe was subsequently switched to a transthoracic cardiac probe for CO measurement at the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) (mean of three consecutive measurements). The order in which the subjects were monitored with the two devices was randomized.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
This portable patch-type carotid ultrasound has not yet been used in clinical settings.
Whether the parameters monitored by portable patch-based ultrasound devices agree with the gold standard has not yet been thoroughly validated
Time frame: through study completion, an average of six months
Hemodynamic parameters, including cardiac output (CO), peak carotid artery velocity (Vmax), and minimum velocity (Vmin), were monitored in healthy subjects using both a portable patch-based ultrasound device and a conventional console ultrasound machine. The agreement and accuracy between the two devices were evaluated by comparing the correlation coefficients of the parameters and analyzing the mean bias using Bland-Altman plots
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Xuzhou Medical University Affiliated Suqian Hospital
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02323503
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Biventricular Pacemakers, Artificial
Aalst, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT00395447
Device Advisory, Device Replacement
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details