Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03658694

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Relief of Fibromyalgia Pain

There are currently several points concerning rTMS for pain relief that have a huge impact in the practical application of rTMS in clinical practice, but which have not been approached by previous studies. Also, an even more important issue is the frequency of the sessions in each treatment protocol. The idea of performing stimulation in chronic pain patients on a consecutive daily basis for long-term treatments seem unrealistic and potentially costly. However, it has been reported in animals, healthy subjects and FM patients that the analgesic effects of rTMS can outlast the stimulation session for several minutes and even days. This has led to the proposal that pain treatment with rTMS could be performed in consecutive daily induction sessions, followed by spaced (weekly, fortnightly and even monthly) maintenance sessions. This approach is similar to what is performed routinely in patients with major depression treated by rTMS to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and has successfully been tested in FM patients in a single- center study. Should this approach prove effective in larger prospective multicentric studies, rTMS could enter the armamentarium of non-invasive, non- pharmacological, low-adverse event therapeutic options to relieve fibromyalgia- related pain and associate symptoms. Hence, our aim is to conduct a multicentric international clinical trial on the influence of rTMS in the control of pain in a consecutive adaptive trial design where conventional rTMS (10Hz) and patterned rTMS (theta-burst) will be studied. Stimulations will be performed in a clinical practice-friendly approach, where daily maintenance sessions will be followed by weekly, and fortnightly stimulation sessions. There have been very scarce adaptive trials in the pain and non-invasive stimulation fields. This methodological approach allows for the use of lower number of patients in consecutive trials and, among other qualities, it allows for the imputation of data from the first trial into the second one, thus decreasing the duration of the studies and the number of participants.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil

Loading trial locations.

About this study

There are currently several points concerning rTMS for pain relief that have a huge impact in the practical application of rTMS in clinical practice, but which have not been approached by previous studies. One of them refers to dosing of the treatment. rTMS sessions have been proposed to comprise from 1000 to 3000 pulses of stimulation in each session, which means that treatment sessions may last from 7 to 20 minutes. While there are positive studies reporting different numbers of pulses, the actual stimulation protocol chosen may impact not only the efficacy of the treatment, but also the duration of the stimulation session, the time patients stay at the health-care facility, and, thus, cost and compliance to treatment. Also, an even more important issue is the frequency of the sessions in each treatment protocol. The idea of performing stimulation in chronic pain patients on a consecutive daily basis for long-term treatments seem unrealistic and potentially costly. However, it has been reported in animals, healthy subjects and FM patients that the analgesic effects of rTMS can outlast the stimulation session for several minutes and even days. This has led to the proposal that pain treatment with rTMS could be performed in consecutive daily induction sessions, followed by spaced (weekly, fortnightly and even monthly) maintenance sessions. This approach is similar to what is performed routinely in patients with major depression treated by rTMS to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and has successfully been tested in FM patients in a single- center study. Should this approach prove effective in larger prospective multicentric studies, rTMS could enter the armamentarium of non-invasive, non- pharmacological, low-adverse event therapeutic options to relieve fibromyalgia- related pain and associate symptoms. Hence, our aim is to conduct a multicentric international clinical trial on the influence of rTMS in the control of pain in a consecutive adaptive trial design where conventional rTMS and patterned rTMS will be studied. Stimulations will be performed in a clinical practice-friendly approach, where daily maintenance sessions will be followed by weekly, and fortnightly stimulation sessions. There have been very scarce adaptive trials in the pain and non-invasive stimulation fields. This methodological approach allows for the use of lower number of patients in consecutive trials and, among other qualities, it allows for the imputation of data from the first trial into the second one, thus decreasing the duration of the studies and the number of participants. Similarly, this technical approach allows for pre-planned interim analyses to be performed during data collection, allowing for the sample size to be readjusted during the trial, and, more importantly, allowing for trial termination due to futility or due to achievement of the primary endpoint before the end of the original preplanned data collection period, with lower risk of bias. Here, the adaptive approach will allow one not only to compare conventional rTMS (10Hz) to sham stimulation, but also, on second consecutive study, it will provide the first head-to-head study on rTMS to date comparing the analgesic effects of conventional (10Hz) and patterned (theta-burst) rTMS .

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female patients with diagnosis fibromyalgia according to the ACR 2016 criteria (patient satisfies modified 2016 fibromyalgia criteria if the following 3 conditions are met: 1) widespread pain index (WPI) ≥ 7 and symptom severity scale (SSS) score 5 OR WPI of 4-6 and SSS score ≥ 9. 2) Generalized pain, defined as pain in at least 4 of 5 regions, must be present. Jaw, chest, and abdominal pain are not included in generalized pain definition. 3) Symptoms have been generally present for at least 3 months. 4) A diagnosis of fibromyalgia is valid irrespective of other diagnoses. A diagnosis of fibromyalgia does not exclude the presence of other clinically important illnesses).
  • Age ≥18 years;
  • Be able to understand study protocol and give signed, written informed consent
  • Not under opioids
  • VAS score ≥ 40/100 mm;

Exclusion criteria

  • Known abuse of alcohol or illicit drugs
  • Known psychiatric conditions
  • Contraindications to rTMS (42) (Head trauma or concussion, metal implants in the skull, pregnancy, cardiac pacemaker, medication infusion devices, previous troubles with TMS or MRI);
  • Not being under chronic contraceptive use (intrauterine dispositive or oral contraceptive)
  • Other medical conditions demand hospitalization;
  • Participation in other clinical studies at the same time

Treatment and study plan

Conventional rTMS - study 1

Procedure

Patients will be undergoing to 10Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation session

Sham rTMS - study 1

Procedure

Patients will be undergoing to sham transcranial magnetic stimulation session

Conventional rTMS - study 2

Procedure

Patients will be undergoing to 10Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation session

Patterned rTMS - stage 2

Procedure

Patients will be undergoing to theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation session

Primary outcomes

  1. Analgesic effects of motor cortex stimulation

    Time frame: 8th week of treatment

    Percentage of responders based on the reduction of ≥50% in pain intensity (numerical rating scale 0-10) at the end of the study compared to baseline.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Global impression of change

    Time frame: 8th and 16th weeks of treatment

    Assess % of very much and much improved

  2. Pain intensity

    Time frame: At the end of the induction period (10th day) and 16th week

    Measured by VAS (0 no pain -10 worst pain)

  3. Mood

    Time frame: 8th week of treatment

    Assess mood by hospital anxiety and depression scale

  4. Impact of fibromyalgia daily

    Time frame: 8th and 16th week of treatment

    Assess by fibromyalgia impact questionnaire

  5. Interference in daily activites

    Time frame: 8th week of treatment

    Measured by brief pain inventory

  6. Medication use

    Time frame: 8th week of treatment

    Measured by Brief Pain Inventory

  7. Phenotypical markers of analgesic response

    Time frame: 8th and 16th week of treatment

    Assessment of phenotypical markers of analgesic response

  8. Adverse events

    Time frame: 8th and 16th week of treatment

    Assess of adverse events by standardized questionnaire'

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Sao Paulo

Other

Collaborators

  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo

Registry information

Official study title

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Precentral-gyrus in the Relief of Fibromyalgia Pain: an International Multicenter Controlled Adaptative Trial

Acronym: TMSFFI

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Sep 5, 2018
Registry last updated
Sep 5, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.