Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05030987

Renal Denervation to Treat Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction has a high mortality, which is contrasted by a total absence of therapy options besides symptomatic diuretic treatment. This study aims to explore the potential of renal denervation as a treatment option for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin III, Halle, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Heart failure is one of the most important diseases worldwide, with a 5-year mortality of up to 75% in symptomatic patients. While substantial progress has been made in the treatment of patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF), mortality for patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains unchanged, despite a comparable prevalence and mortality of the disease as for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

HFpEF is a heterogeneous condition and has been a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for clinicians and researchers over the past decades. While some rare cases of HFpEF can be attributed to specific diseases like amyloidosis, in most other patients common characteristics are increased ventricular filling pressures and ventricular and arterial stiffening as frequently caused by ageing, diabetes and arterial hypertension. Furthermore, increased sympathetic activity has been described as one pathogenic contributor to chronic heart failure and is associated with poor clinical prognosis. It also leads to a more pulsatile BP profile which can cause a mismatch in arterio-ventricular coupling.

The modulating effects on the sympathetic nervous system induced by renal denervation (RDN) should be beneficial in HFpEF, as they improve resting and exercise hemodynamics due to an improved ventriculoarterial coupling by reduced aortic stiffness and lower systemic blood pressure. In addition, RDN leads to optimized stroke volume and stroke work and might affect cardiac preload by improving blood distribution into the splanchnic compartment.

This study aims to explore the potential of RDN as a therapy for HFpEF in a single center pilot trial using a randomized, sham-controlled double-blind design.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • confirmed arterial hypertension (1-5 antihypertensive drugs without any dosage change in the preceding 4 weeks) and average systolic BP between >125 and ≤170 mmHg and diastolic BP ≤110 mmHg in 24h ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM)
  • HFpEF (defined by clinical signs and/or symptoms of heart failure, objective structural cardiac abnormalities according to the ESC (European Society of Cardiology) criteria [1], elevated NT-proBNP ≥125 pg/mL and left-ventricular ejection fraction ≥55%)
  • NYHA-Class II or III
  • Confirmation of an elevated cardiac filling pressures (either LVEDP >= 16 mmHg or PCWP >= 15 mmHg at rest or >=25 mmHg during exercise) by catheterization
  • Age 18-80 years
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • ≥1 main renal artery diameter <3.0 mm
  • main renal artery length < 20 mm
  • a single functioning kidney
  • presence of abnormal kidney tumors
  • renal artery aneurysm
  • pre-existing renal stent or history of renal artery angioplasty
  • fibromuscular disease of the renal arteries
  • presence of renal artery stenosis of any origin ≥50%
  • iliac/femoral artery stenosis precluding femoral access for RDN
  • fertile women (within two years of their last menstruation) without appropriate contraceptive measures (implanon, injections, oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices, partner with vasectomy) while participating in the trial (participants using a hormone-based method have to be informed of possible effects of the trial device on contraception).
  • participation in other interventional trials
  • patients under legal supervision or guardianship
  • suspected lack of compliance
  • pregnant women
  • Presence of intracardiac pacemakers or implantable cardioverter/defibrillators

Treatment and study plan

Renal Denervation

Procedure

Renal denervation in patients with HFpEF and uncontrolled hypertension

Sham

Procedure

Sham Treatment. After six months, cross-over is planned in all sham-treated patients and this patients will also receive a renal denervation.

Other names: Sham Procedure

Primary outcomes

  1. exercise pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) at 20 W workload

    Time frame: 6 months after randomization

    To assess the hemodynamic effects of RDN in patients with HFpEF in comparison to sham-treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. number of combination of death, increase in diuretic therapy, hospitalization for heart failure, worsening NYHA-class, change in pulmonary pressure parameters

    Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months after RDN

    number of combined endpoint in RDN and SHAM patients

  2. Change in mean Pulmonary artery (PA) pressure, estimated pulmonary artery diastolic pressure (ePAD) and PA pressure variability from pulmonary pressure sensor measurements

    Time frame: 6 months after randomization

    difference between RDN and sham

  3. Change in mean PA pressure, ePAD and PA pressure variability from pulmonary pressure sensor measurements

    Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months after RDN

    Change in mean PA pressure, ePAD and PA pressure variability from pulmonary pressure sensor measurements, compared to baseline values

  4. Change in Systolic/Diastolic 24h blood pressure by ABPM and blood pressure variability

    Time frame: 6 months after randomization

    difference between RDN and sham

  5. Change in Systolic/Diastolic 24h blood pressure by ABPM and blood pressure variability

    Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months after RDN

    Change in Systolic/Diastolic 24h blood pressure by ABPM and blood pressure variability, compared to baseline values

  6. Difference in ventriculo-arterial coupling

    Time frame: 6 months after randomization

    Difference in ventriculo-arterial coupling (by end-systolic elastance and arterial elastance) as acquired by invasive measurement

  7. Change in Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) based hemodynamics

    Time frame: 6 months after randomization

    Change in CMR-based hemodynamics (difference between RDN and sham) as compared to baseline values

  8. Change in ventriculo-arterial coupling

    Time frame: 6 months after randomization

    Change in ventriculo-arterial coupling (cMRI and echocardiogram) (difference between RDN and sham) as compared to baseline values

  9. Difference in resting and exercise PCWP (at 20, 40, 60, 80 W, and maximum workload)

    Time frame: 6 months after randomization

    Difference in resting and exercise PCWP (at 20, 40, 60, 80 W, and maximum workload) (difference between RDN and sham) as compared to baseline values

  10. Difference in peak PCWP

    Time frame: 6 months after randomization

    Difference in peak PCWP (difference between RDN and sham) as compared to baseline values

  11. Difference in NT-proBNP

    Time frame: 6 months after randomization

    Difference in NT-proBNP (difference between RDN and sham) as compared to baseline

  12. Difference in NT-proBNP

    Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months after RDN

    Difference in NT-proBNP as compared to baseline

  13. number of patients with Hospitalizations for heart failure

    Time frame: 6 months after randomization

    number of patients with Hospitalizations for heart failure (difference between RDN and sham)

  14. difference in All-cause Mortality

    Time frame: 6 months after randomization

    All-cause Mortality (difference between RDN and sham)

  15. difference in cardiac mortality

    Time frame: 6 months after randomization

    cardiac mortality (difference between RDN and sham)

  16. difference in major adverse cardiovascular events

    Time frame: 6 months after randomization

    major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke and hospitalization for heart failure) (difference between RDN and sham)

  17. difference in number of Adverse Events

    Time frame: 6 months after randomization

    Adverse events (difference between RDN and sham)

  18. difference in Frequency of patients with controlled hypertension

    Time frame: 6 months after randomization

    Frequency of patients with controlled hypertension (blood pressure within treatment goals in ABPM as recommended by the European Society of Cardiology) (difference between RDN and sham)

  19. difference in Frequency of patients with controlled hypertension

    Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months after RDN

    Frequency of patients with controlled hypertension (blood pressure within treatment goals in ABPM as recommended by the European Society of Cardiology) as compared to baseline

  20. Difference in 6-minute walk distance

    Time frame: 6 months after randomization

    Difference in 6-minute walk distance (difference between RDN and sham)

  21. Difference in 6-minute walk distance

    Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months after RDN

    Difference in 6-minute walk distance as compared to baseline

  22. Change in exercise BP and maximum maximum exercise capacity

    Time frame: 6 months after randomization

    Change in exercise BP between baseline and 6 months and maximum exercise capacity between baseline and 6 months (difference between RDN and sham)

  23. Change in Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire (difference between RDN and sham)

    Time frame: 6 months after randomization

    Change in Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire (difference between RDN and sham)

  24. Change in Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire

    Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months after RDN

    Change in Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire, compared to baseline

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Karl Fengler, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

49 341 ext. 8651426

Philipp Lurz, Prof. Dr.

CONTACT

[email protected]

49 6131 ext. 177251

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Leipzig

Other

Collaborators

  • ReCor Medical, Inc.

Registry information

Official study title

Renal Denervation to Treat Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction - A Pilot Trial

Acronym: UNLOAD-HFpEF

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2026
First posted
Sep 1, 2021
Registry last updated
Jul 17, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.