Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04434664

BLOCKade of Calcium Channels and Beta Adrenergic Receptors for the Treatment of Hypertension in HFpEF

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a critical public health problem. Heart failure (HF) affects over 5 million adults in the United States (US), and is a major source of morbidity, mortality, and impaired quality of life. Approximately half of individuals with HF have a preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF), termed HF with preserved EF (HFpEF). While there are several effective pharmacologic therapies for HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), none have been identified for HFpEF. Hypertension, which is present in approximately 80% of individuals with HFpEF, is the foremost modifiable risk factor for the development and progression of HFpEF. Despite the clinical importance of hypertension in HFpEF, there is limited information on how common antihypertensive agents, particularly calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and β-blockers, effect pathophysiologic mechanisms of HFpEF. This is a mechanistic investigation of the role of dihydropyridine CCBs compared to β-blockers (commonly used antihypertensive agents in clinical practice) in targeting key physiologic abnormalities in HFpEF.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–90 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults age 18-90 years
  • Diagnosis of hypertension defined by at least two of the following: A) ICD-9 (401.0-404.91) or ICD-10 (I10-I13) codes signifying hypertension; B) Treatment with antihypertensive medication other than a loop diuretic for at least two months; C) History of previous blood pressure readings ≥130/80 mmHg at two separate office visits
  • Stable antihypertensive therapy; defined as no changes in antihypertensive medications in the preceding 30 days
  • A diagnosis of heart failure
  • LV ejection fraction >50%
  • Elevated filling pressures defined by at least one of the following criteria: A) Mitral E/e' ratio (lateral or septal) >8 with low e' velocity (septal e' <7 cm/s or lateral e' <10 cm/s) and at least one of the following: a. Enlarged left atrium (LA volume index >34 ml/m2); b. Chronic loop diuretic use for management of symptoms; c. Elevated natriuretic peptides (BNP levels >100 ng/L or NT-proBNP levels >300 ng/L); B) Mitral E/e' ratio (lateral or septal) >14; C) Previously elevated invasively determined filling pressures based on one of the following criteria: a. Resting LVEDP >16 mmHg; b. Mean PCWP >12 mmHg; c. PCWP or LVEDP ≥25 mmHg with exercise; D) Previous acutely decompensated heart failure requiring IV diuretics;

Exclusion criteria

  • Systolic BP meeting any of the following criteria: A) Current office systolic BP <100 mmHg; B) Current office systolic BP 100-119 mmHg if not receiving treatment with an antihypertensive agent or if holding antihypertensive medication prior to randomization would be clinically contraindicated, as per the investigator's clinical judgement; C) Current office systolic BP ≥180 mmHg if not receiving treatment with a CCB or β-blocker, or ≥160 mmHg if already receiving a CCB and/or β-blocker prior to the pre-randomization wash-out period; D) Orthostatic hypotension defined as >20 mmHg decline in office systolic BP 3-5 minutes following the transition from sitting to standing position
  • Resting heart rate <50 or >100 bpm
  • Contraindication to withholding CCB or β-blocker therapy (e.g. use of non-dihydropyridine CCB [diltiazem or verapamil] or β-blocker for rate control for atrial fibrillation) as per the investigator's clinical judgement
  • Children, fetuses, neonates, prisoners, and pregnant women (women of childbearing age will undergo a pregnancy test during the screening visit) are not included in this research study.
  • Inability/unwillingness to exercise
  • Any the following echocardiographic findings: A) LV ejection fraction <45% on any prior echocardiogram, unless it was in the setting of uncontrolled atrial fibrillation; B) Hypertrophic, infiltrative, or inflammatory cardiomyopathy; C) Clinically significant pericardial disease, as per investigator judgment; D) Moderate or greater left-sided valvular disease, any degree of mitral stenosis, or prosthetic mitral valve; E) Severe right-sided valvular disease; F) Severe right ventricular dysfunction
  • Active coronary artery disease, defined as any of the following: A) Acute coronary syndrome or coronary intervention in the past 2 months; B) Ischemia on stress testing without either subsequent revascularization or a subsequent angiogram demonstrating the absence of clinically significant epicardial coronary artery disease, as per investigator judgement
  • Clinically significant lung disease, defined as any of the following: A) Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease meeting GOLD criteria stage III or greater; B) Treatment with oral steroids within the past 6 months for an exacerbation of obstructive lung disease; C) The use of daytime supplemental oxygen
  • Primary pulmonary arteriopathy
  • eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m2
  • Any medical condition that, under the investigator's discretion, will interfere with safe completion of the study or validity of the endpoint assessments
  • Known history of an allergy or clinically significant sensitivity (as determined by the investigator) to either amlodipine besylate or metoprolol succinate

Treatment and study plan

Amlodipine Besylate

Drug

The interventions will be implemented in random order in a crossover (AB-BA) design, separated by an approximately one-week washout period

Metoprolol succinate

Drug

The interventions will be implemented in random order in a crossover (AB-BA) design, separated by an approximately one-week washout period

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in Home Systolic Blood Pressure

    Time frame: Measured during the last week of each of the two 4-week intervention phases

    The difference in home systolic blood pressure between treatments was determined using a single summary value per participant per intervention period, calculated as the mean of all available home systolic BP readings obtained during the final week of each intervention period. Home BP monitoring was performed using the same validated device model (Microlife BP 3MX1-4 WatchBP Home N), with three consecutive measurements taken in the morning and evening each day over the seven-day period.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference in Home Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Time frame: Measured during the last week of each of the two 4-week intervention phases

    The difference in home diastolic blood pressure between treatments was determined using a single summary value per participant per intervention period, calculated as the mean of all available home diastolic BP readings obtained during the final week of each intervention period. Home BP monitoring was performed using the same validated device model (Microlife BP 3MX1-4 WatchBP Home N), with three consecutive measurements taken in the morning and evening each day over the seven-day period.

  2. Difference in Office Systolic Blood Pressure

    Time frame: Measured at the end of each of the two 4-week intervention phases

    Blood pressure will be measured at rest with a validated oscillometric device (Uscom BP+/UM-211).

  3. Difference in Office Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Time frame: Measured at the end of each of the two 4-week intervention phases

    Blood pressure will be measured at rest with a validated oscillometric device (Uscom BP+/UM-211).

  4. Difference in Peak Oxygen Consumption (VO2) During a Maximal Exercise Test

    Time frame: Measured at the end of each of the two 4-week intervention phases

    We will use a supine cycle ergometer in conjunction with expired gas analysis to assess oxygen consumption (VO2) during exercise. Subjects will perform a maximal exertion-limited exercise test using a graded-exercise protocol.

  5. Difference in Quality of Life

    Time frame: Measured at the end of each of the two 4-week intervention phases

    Quality of life will be assessed with the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. The responses are categorized under 3 subscales (symptom burden, physical limitation and quality of life) with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100. The total score will be calculated as the mean of the three subscale scores. A mean score of 100 represents the least symptoms and 0 represents the worst symptoms.

  6. Difference in Systemic Vasodilatory Response to Exercise

    Time frame: Measured at the end of each of the two 4-week intervention phases

    Systemic vascular resistance (SVR) will be calculated at rest and at peak exercise as mean arterial pressure / cardiac output. Systemic vasodilatory reserve will be measured as the percentage reduction in SVR during exercise, relative to SVR at rest ([rest SVR - peak exercise SVR] / rest SVR) x 100%.

  7. Difference in Arterial Wave Reflections

    Time frame: Measured at the end of each of the two 4-week intervention phases

    Arterial wave reflections will be assessed using radial artery pressure waveforms obtained with a high-fidelity applanation tonometer. Waveforms will be calibrated using brachial mean and diastolic blood pressure. Forward and backward pressure wave components will be derived using wave separation analysis, and arterial wave reflection magnitude will be quantified as the ratio of backward to forward pressure wave amplitudes (unitless ratio). Change from baseline will be reported.

  8. Difference in Large Artery Stiffness

    Time frame: Measured at the end of each of the two 4-week intervention phases

    Large artery stiffness will be assessed by measuring carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity using arterial applanation tonometry. Pulse wave velocity will be calculated as the distance between the carotid and femoral recording sites divided by the transit time of the arterial pressure waveform.

  9. Difference in Left Ventricular Filling Pressure

    Time frame: Measured at the end of each of the two 4-week intervention phases

    We will assess the ratio of early diastolic mitral inflow velocity (E) to mitral annular tissue velocity (e'; a surrogate of LV filling pressures) on echocardiography

  10. Difference in Myocardial Strain

    Time frame: Measured at the end of each of the two 4-week intervention phases

    Left ventricular systolic function will be assessed by global longitudinal myocardial strain measured using two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography. Strain will be calculated as the peak systolic percentage change in myocardial length from end-diastole to end-systole, expressed as a percentage.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Pennsylvania

Other

Registry information

Official study title

BLOCKade of Calcium Channels and Beta Adrenergic Receptors for the Treatment of Hypertension in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (BLOCK HFpEF) Trial

Acronym: BLOCK HFpEF

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Jun 17, 2020
Registry last updated
Jan 30, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.