University Hospital FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg
Erlangen, 91054, Germany
NCT Number: NCT05460169
RDN-ADPKD is a prospective, randomized (1:1, central randomization), single-center, hypothesis-generating, feasibility study. The purpose of the RDN-ADPKD study is to demonstrate efficacy and document safety of renal denervation (RDN) with the Paradise System in hypertensive patients with ADPKD.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Erlangen, 91054, Germany
Patients are randomized into (immediate) I-RDN-group and (delayed) D-RDN-group, respectively. After 3 months, patients in the D-RDN-group will undergo RDN-procedure and will be followed for additional 36 months. Hence, study design allows several comparisons both of whole study group (at same time-point of follow-up) as well as between I-RDN-group and D-RDN-group.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The Paradise® Renal Denervation System (Paradise System) is CE-marked in countries accepting the CE mark. The system is a catheter-based device designed to use ultrasound energy to thermally ablate the afferent and efferent nerves surrounding the renal artery and serving the kidney.
Time frame: 3 months post-procedure
change in systolic 24-h ambulatory BP at 3 months post-procedure from pre-treatment in the whole study group (irrespective whether treated immediate [I-RDN-group] or delayed [D-RDN-group]).
Time frame: 3 months post-procedure
Change in diastolic 24-h ambulatory BP at 3 months post-procedure in the whole study group (irrespetive whether treated immmediate (I-RDN-group) or delayed (D-RDN-group) compared to pre-treatment
Time frame: 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 months post-procedure
Change in systolic and diastolic 24-h ambulatory BP at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months post-procedure in the whole study group (irrespective whether treated immediate [I-RDN-group] or delayed [D-RDN-group]) compared to pre-treatment
Time frame: 3 months post-procedure
Change in systolic and diastolic 24-h ambulatory BP at 3 months post-procedure from pre-treatment in the I-RDN-group versus the change in systolic 24-h ambulatory BP prior procedure from pre-treatment in D-RDN-group
Time frame: 3 months post-procedure
Responder rate in BP (systolic office BP ≥ 5 mmHg, or 24-h systolic ambulatory BP ≥ 3 mmHg) at 3 months pre-treatment in the I-RDN-group versus responder rate in BP from pre-treatment to 3 months later in the D-RDN-group.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 months post-procedure
Change in systolic and diastolic office (attended) BP at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24, 30, 36 months post-procedure in the whole study group compared to pre-treatment
Time frame: 3 months post-procedure
Change in systolic office (attended) BP at 3 months post-procedure from pre-treatment in the I-RDN-group versus the change prior procedure from pre-treatment in D-RDN-group
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post-procedure
Change in systolic and diastolic home BP (IEM-Tel-O-Graph-GSM) at 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post-procedure in the whole study group compared to pre-treatment
Time frame: 3 months post-procedure
Change in systolic and diastolic home BP at 3 months post-procedure in the I-RDN-group versus the change prior procedure from pre-treatment in D-RDN-group.
Time frame: 3 months post-procedure
Win ratio analysis will be conducted, with the criteria 24h ambulatory systolic BP change > 3 mmHg, office systolic BP change > 5 mmHg, and decrease of medication number from pre-treatment to 3 month post procedure in the I-RDN group versus pre-treatment to 3 months later in D-RDN-group.
Time frame: 3 months post-procedure
Win ratio analysis will be conducted, with the criteria 24h ambulatory systolic BP change > 3 mmHg, office systolic BP change > 5 mmHg, and any decrease of drug burden index from pre-treatment to 3 month post procedure in the I-RDN group versus pre-treatment to 3 months later in D-RDN-group.
Time frame: 3 months post-procedure
Win ratio analysis will be conducted, with the criteria 24h ambulatory systolic BP change > 3 mmHg, office systolic BP change > 5 mmHg, and any decrease of antihypertensive load index from pre-treatment to 3 month post procedure in the I-RDN group versus pre-treatment to 3 months later in D-RDN-group
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24, 30, 36 months post-procedure
Change in serum creatinine derived estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24, 30 and 36 months post-procedure in the whole study group compared to pre-treatment
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24, 30, 36 months post-procedure
Change in cystatin C derived estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24, 30, 36 months post-procedure in the whole study group compared to pre-treatment
Time frame: 6, 12, 24, 36 months post-procedure
Change in total kidney volume (assessed by magnetic resonance imaging) at 6, 12, 24, 36 months post-procedure in the whole study group compared to pre-treatment
Time frame: 6, 12, 24, 36 months post-procedure
Change in measured GFR (assessed by single-shot iohexol clearance) at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post-procedure in the whole study group compared to pre-treatment
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months post-procedure
Change in proteinuria (per g urinary creatinine) at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months post-procedure from pre-treatment.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months post-procedure
Change in albuminuria (per g urinary creatinine) at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months post-procedure from pre-treatment.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months post-procedure
Change in urine sodium (per g urinary creatinine) at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months post-procedure from pre-treatment.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months post-procedure
Change in urine potassium (per urinary creatinine) at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months post-procedure from pre-treatment.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months post-procedure
Change in urine creatinine concentration at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months post-procedure from pre-treatment.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months post-procedure
Change of the slope of eGFR after 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months post-procedure from pre-treatment compared to the historical slope the year before in the total study group.
Time frame: 3 months post-procedure
Change in serum creatinine derived eGFR at 3 months post-procedure from pre-treatment in the I-RDN-group versus the change prior procedure from pre-treatment in D-RDN-group
Time frame: 3 months post-procedure
Change in cystatin C derived eGFR at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24, 30, 36 months post-procedure from pre-treatment in the I-RDN-group versus the change prior procedure from pre-treatment in D-RDN-group
Time frame: 3 months post-procedure
Change in proteinuria from pre-procedure pre-treatment in the I-RDN-group versus the change from pre-treatment to 3 months later in the D-RDN-group.
Time frame: 3 months post-procedure
Change in albuminuria from pre-procedure pre-treatment in the I-RDN-group versus the change from pre-treatment to 3 months later in the D-RDN-group.
Time frame: 3 months post-procedure
Change in urine sodium from pre-procedure pre-treatment in the I-RDN-group versus the change from pre-treatment to 3 months later in the D-RDN-group.
Time frame: 3 months post-procedure
Change in urine potassium from pre-procedure pre-treatment in the I-RDN-group versus the change from pre-treatment to 3 months later in the D-RDN-group.
Time frame: 3 months post-procedure
Change in urine creatinine concentration from pre-procedure pre-treatment in the I-RDN-group versus the change from pre-treatment to 3 months later in the D-RDN-group.
Time frame: 3 month post-procedure
Change of the slope of eGFR after 3 month post-procedure from pre-treatment (including eGFR values) in the I-RDN group compared to change after 3 month FU from pre-treatment in the D-RDN group.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 months post-procedure
Level of pain (related to autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease) determined by the use of a visual analogue scale (minimum value=0, representing no pain; maximum value=100, representing most imaginable pain) at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 months post-procedure in the whole study group compared to pre-treatment.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post-procedure
Change in Quality of life (QoL) (e.g. EQ-5D-5L; minimum value=0, representing best imaginable health status; maximum value=100, representing worst imaginable health status) at 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post-procedure in the whole study group compared to pre-treatment
Time frame: 6, 12 months post-procedure
Change in plasma and urinary biomarkers (e.g. albumin, copeptin) at 6, 12 months post-procedure in the whole study group compared to pre-treatment
University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical School
Other
Effect of Renal Denervation in Hypertensive Patients With Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease
Acronym: RDN-ADPKD
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04264403
Chronic Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease stage3
Düsseldorf, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT07049289
Arterial Hypertension, Cardiovascular Diseases
Leipzig, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT03209154
Uncontrolled Hypertension
Oslo, Norway
View Trial DetailsNCT06034743
Cardiovascular Diseases, Hypertension
Saraland, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details