Facultade de Odontoloxía
Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, 15782, Spain
NCT Number: NCT07430748
Introduction: Periodontal disease causes the progressive loss of supporting structures of the teeth, resulting in bone and soft tissue defects that compromise function and aesthetics. Regenerative periodontal therapy aims to restore these tissues through techniques that stimulate bone and connective tissue regeneration. Among the biomaterials used, Leukocyte- and Platelet-Rich Fibrin (L-PRF) has become widely applied due to its autologous origin, simplicity of preparation, and capacity to release growth factors that promote angiogenesis and wound healing. However, the regenerative potential of new bioactive materials such as REGENFAST®, a combination of polynucleotides and hyaluronic acid, has recently gained attention. Polynucleotides act as biological stimulators that enhance fibroblast activity and tissue oxygenation, while hyaluronic acid improves extracellular matrix remodeling and hydration. Although preclinical data suggest beneficial effects of REGENFAST® in soft and hard tissue repair, direct clinical comparisons with L-PRF in periodontal regeneration remain limited.
Objectives: The main objective is to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiographic efficacy of REGENFAST® and L-PRF in the treatment of bilateral periodontal defects.
Specific objectives include:
* Assessing the gain in clinical attachment level (CAL) at 3 months postoperatively as the primary outcome. * Comparing changes in probing depth, gingival recession, bleeding on probing, and gingival inflammation index. * Evaluating wound healing using the Landry Healing Index and recording total surgical and epithelialization times. * Assessing radiographic bone density changes between baseline and 3 months. Patient inclusion will be based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria to ensure homogeneity and comparability.
Material and methods: A randomized, split-mouth pilot clinical trial will be conducted in patients presenting bilateral periodontal defects. Each subject will receive REGENFAST® on one site and L-PRF on the contralateral site, assigned by computer-generated randomization. Following local anesthesia, full-thickness flaps will be raised, and defects will be debrided and conditioned. The respective biomaterial will then be applied, and the flaps will be repositioned and sutured. Postoperative evaluations will occur at 7 days, 1 month, and 3 months, recording clinical parameters and radiographic outcomes. Data will be analyzed using paired t-tests with a significance level of p<0.05. The study will adhere to the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines, with informed consent obtained from all participants.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Early Phase 1
Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, 15782, Spain
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
In this arm, periodontal defects are treated with REGENFAST®, a biomaterial composed of polynucleotides and hyaluronic acid designed to promote tissue regeneration, reduce inflammation, and enhance wound healing. After thorough debridement of the defect, REGENFAST® is applied following the manufacturer's protocol. The treated site is then covered with a mucoperiosteal flap and sutured. This arm aims to evaluate the clinical and biological effects of REGENFAST® on periodontal tissue healing and regeneration compared to L-PRF.
In this arm, the contralateral periodontal defect in the same patient is treated with Leukocyte- and Platelet-Rich Fibrin (L-PRF), an autologous platelet concentrate obtained from the patient's venous blood by centrifugation without anticoagulants. The resulting fibrin membrane is placed directly into the prepared periodontal defect to stimulate angiogenesis and soft tissue repair through the sustained release of growth factors. This arm serves as the active comparator to assess differences in regenerative outcomes relative to REGENFAST® treatment.
Time frame: Baseline (preoperative) 1 month postoperative 3 months postoperative (primary analysis time point)
To evaluate the gain in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) at the site treated with REGENFAST® compared to the site treated with L-PRF, 3 months after surgery. This parameter serves as the main indicator of periodontal tissue regeneration and reduction of gingival recession.
Time frame: Baseline (preoperative), 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively.
Distance from the cementoenamel junction to the gingival margin. Measured using a calibrated UNC-15 periodontal probe with 0.5 mm precision, under standardized conditions.
Time frame: Baseline (preoperative), 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively.
Distance from the gingival margin to the base of the sulcus or periodontal pocket. Measured using a calibrated UNC-15 periodontal probe with uniform pressure and technique across all evaluations.
Time frame: Baseline (preoperative), 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively.
Indicator of soft tissue inflammation, recorded as presence or absence of bleeding within 15 seconds after probe insertion. Visual inspection under standardized probing conditions.
Time frame: Baseline (preoperative), 7 days, 14 days, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively.
Clinical assessment of gingival inflammation on a 0-3 ordinal scale (0: no inflammation; 3: severe inflammation with spontaneous bleeding). Visual scoring by a blinded examiner.
Time frame: 7 days and 14 days postoperatively.
Qualitative assessment of wound healing based on color, exudate, granulation tissue, and epithelialization. Scored from 1 (very poor) to 5 (excellent) healing.
Time frame: Intraoperative (single measurement).
Duration of the surgical procedure from the first incision to complete flap closure. Recorded in minutes using a digital chronometer.
Time frame: Daily evaluation until complete healing or up to 14 days postoperatively.
Time required for complete epithelialization of the surgical site without signs of inflammation or exudate. Direct clinical observation by the operator and digital photographic documentation.
Time frame: Baseline (preoperative) and 3 months postoperatively.
Assessment of bone density and reduction of the radiographic defect in the treated area. Standardized periapical radiographs (parallel technique) analyzed using digital densitometry software (gray scale units).
University of Santiago de Compostela
Other
Comparison of REGENFAST and L-PRF in Bilateral Periodontal Defects: A Split-Mouth Pilot Clinical Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06693739
Regeneration
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07233733
Mouth Diseases, Periodontal Diseases
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
View Trial DetailsNCT01976065
Dental Pulp Diseases, Dental Pulp Necrosis
Loma Linda, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05447026
Lasers, Mouth Diseases
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details