Centeno-Schultz Clinic
Broomfield, Colorado, 80021, United States
NCT Number: NCT01850758
The primary objective of this study is to compare the improvement in subject-reported clinical outcomes for Regenexx SD vs. Exercise Therapy treatment of partial and complete, non-retracted knee ACL ligament tears, from baseline to 3 months, with continued evaluation of efficacy and durability up to 24 months.
Secondary objectives include evaluation of MRI evidence of tendon repair; incidence of post-operative complications, adverse events, re-injections, and surgical intervention; change in pain score and use of pain medications.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Broomfield, Colorado, 80021, United States
Prospective, randomized, controlled to include 25 subjects treated with Regenexx SD and 25 subjects treated with exercise therapy alone with the exercise group crossing over to the injection group at 3 months.
Subjects will have a partial or complete, non-retracted ACL ligament tear as evidenced with MRI.
Subjects will be enrolled within 60 days prior to Regenexx-SD injection or initiation of exercise therapy and take part in follow-up visits for two years following treatment. A preoperative visit will occur at the time of enrollment; follow-up visits will occur at the clinical site at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post injection.
The primary endpoint analysis will be conducted once all subjects reach the 3 month endpoint. Subjects will continue to be followed through the 2 year endpoint with data analysis performed at the 1 year and 2 year time points.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
stem cell treatment
exercise therapy control
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 3 months
The primary endpoint for this study is the difference between treatment groups in the within patient mean change from baseline to 3 months in IKDC scores.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Difference between treatment groups in mean 0-10 pain scales at each follow-up timepoint
Time frame: 6 months
Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Evaluation of ligament repair at 6 months
Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months
Difference between treatment groups in mean KDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Scores at 6, 12 and 24 months.
Time frame: 24 months
Incidence and time to resolution of post-operative complications and adverse events between treatment groups.
Time frame: 24 months
Incidence of and time to re-injection and surgical revision between treatment groups.
Time frame: 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Difference between treatment groups in use of pain medications at each follow-up timepoint
Regenexx, LLC
Industry
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Regenexx™ SD Versus Exercise Therapy for Treatment of Partial and Complete, Non-retracted Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07681193
ACL Injury, ACL Tear
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02787096
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear
Lyon, France
View Trial DetailsNCT04135950
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear
Buffalo, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05190120
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial Details