Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
NCT Number: NCT07242820
The goal of this clinical trial is to clarify the role of adjuvant thermal ablation for non-thermal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large (≥20mm) flat colorectal polyps (so-called laterally spreading lesions [LSLs]).
The hypothesis is that adding adjuvant thermal ablation to non-thermal EMR (vs no ablation) will result in lower lesion recurrence rates at 6-month follow-up, and non-inferior adverse events (AE) rates 14 days post EMR.
For participants with planned EMR, endoscopists will perform non-thermal EMRs as per standard of care and:
* adjuvant thermal ablation will either not be performed (control group), or will be applied to the base and outside margins of the resection site (experimental group); * then, all patients will be contacted 14-44 days after EMR, to verbally ascertain the occurrence of AEs; * then, all patients will undergo a first follow-up colonoscopy at 6 months after initial conoloscopy to assess lesion recurrence; * finally, all patients will undergo a second and final colonoscopy 18 months after EMR.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
This trial is an open-label, two-arm, parallel-group, multicenter RCT with co-primary outcomes (superiority for recurrence, non-inferiority for AEs). Patients undergoing non-thermal EMR will be randomized (1:1) to adjuvant thermal ablation (experimental group) or no ablation (control group).
All participating endoscopists will view dedicated teaching videos of the standard thermal ablation technique and key technical details to ensure consistent study procedures. Patients with planned EMR procedures will be invited by a research assistant before the EMR to participate in the study. Patients will be randomized to control or experimental groups in a 1:1 ratio using a central REDCap randomization module after the EMR resection phase is completed and immediately before adjuvant thermal ablation (intervention). This will limit bias by ensuring that the EMR technique is not affected by group allocation. When 2 or more lesions are present in a patient, the largest lesion will be chosen for inclusion in the study and all lesions will be photodocumented for auditing purposes.
No ablation (control group): Non-thermal EMR will be performed as per standard of care with submucosal injection and non-electrocautery resection of all visually visible polyp tissue using a snare. When the endoscopist determines that the resection is complete, no adjuvant thermal ablation of the post-EMR defect will be performed. Defect closure using clips will be performed only if there is concern for injury to the muscle layer or signs of overt perforation. A tattoo will be placed 3 cm distal to the resected lesion to allow for better identification of the resection site for follow-up. If multiple large polyps are found and removed, the largest lesion (study polyp) will be marked with two tattoos 3 cm distally and 3 cm proximally, to clearly identify the study polyp resection site.
Adjuvant thermal ablation (experimental group): Non-thermal EMR will be performed as per standard of care with submucosal injection and non-electrocautery resection of all visually visible polyp tissue using a snare. When the endoscopist determines that the resection is complete, submucosal injection (0.9% NaCl with methylene blue solution) using the h-APC probe (ERBEJET 2 attached to Vio3 electrosurgical unit, pressure: 40 bar) will be performed to further expose the resection margin. Adjuvant thermal ablation will be applied to the outside margins of the resection site using the h-APC probe. Then, adjuvant thermal ablation will also be applied to the base of the resection site using the h-APC probe. The precise electrocautery mode (PRECISE-APC setting 9) will be used to apply thermal ablation, as previously described for h-APC. Defect closure using clips will be performed only if there is concern for injury to the muscle layer or signs of overt perforation. A tattoo will be placed in the same way as described in the control group and, again, if multiple large polyps are found and removed, the largest lesion (study polyp) will be marked with two tattoos 3 cm distally and 3 cm proximally, to clearly identify the study polyp resection site.
At 6 months after initial colonoscopy, patients will undergo a first follow-up colonoscopy, as suggested by current guidelines and from studies showing that most recurrences occurred within the first 6 months. A window of 3 to 13 months will be permitted for the first follow-up. If recurrence is detected, patients will undergo subsequent colonoscopies at shortened intervals, as determined by the treating endoscopist, until no recurrence is detected. If surgery is performed due to difficulty in treating recurrence, patients will undergo a follow-up colonoscopy 6 months after surgery to detect any possible recurrence. All patients will undergo a second and final study colonoscopy 18 months after randomization, which will also mark the end of study follow-up. The second follow-up may be conducted within a window of 14 to 24 months. Subsequent colonoscopies will then be recommended outside the study as per routine care for such a clinical situation.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
When the endoscopist determines that the resection is complete, submucosal injection (0.9% NaCl with methylene blue solution) using the h-APC probe (ERBEJET 2 attached to Vio3 electrosurgical unit, pressure: 40 bar) will be performed to further expose the resection margin. Adjuvant thermal ablation will be applied to the outside margins of the resection site using the h-APC probe.
Adjuvant thermal ablation will then also be applied to the base of the resection site using the h-APC probe. The precise electrocautery mode (PRECISE-APC setting 9) will be used to apply thermal ablation, as previously described for h-APC.
After performing non-thermal EMR with thermal ablation, adjuvant thermal ablation will not be performed.
Time frame: 6 months
Defined as the number of cases with pathology-confirmed hyperplastic, serrated, or adenomatous histology at the tattooed resection site compatible with the study polyp histology divided by the total number of cases.
Time frame: 14 days
Defined as the number of cases with delayed bleeding (blood per rectum resulting in emergency room visit, unplanned hospitalization, endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical intervention) and/or delayed perforation (endoscopic or radiologic evidence of significant air or any luminal contents outside the gastrointestinal tract) divided by the total number of cases.
Time frame: 14 days
Defined as the number of cases with blood per rectum, regardless of clinical significance, divided by the total number of cases.
Time frame: 18 months
Defined as the number of cases with pathology-confirmed hyperplastic, serrated, or adenomatous histology at the tattooed resection site compatible with the study polyp histology divided by the total number of cases.
Time frame: 18 months
Defined as the number of cases with high-grade dysplasia on resection scars divided by the total number of cases.
Time frame: From enrollment to the final follow-up colonoscopy at 18 months
Defined as the number of cases with pathology-confirmed carcinomas divided by the total number of cases.
Time frame: 18 months
Defined as the total number of colonoscopies required to achieve lesion clearance, which means no histologic recurrence at the resection scar on follow-up.
Time frame: 1 day
Defined as the length of time required for the initial EMR.
Time frame: 14 days
Number of cases with clinically significant delayed bleeding in the proximal colon (proximal to the splenic flexure) divided by the total number of cases.
Time frame: 1 day
Time required for defect closure.
Time frame: 6 months
Number of cases with technical success for complete defect closure (defined as adequate apposition of the mucosal defect margins without visible submucosal areas >3mm along the closure line) divided by total number of cases.
Time frame: From enrollment to the final follow-up colonoscopy at 18 months
Total costs required to perform non-thermal EMR with adjuvant thermal ablation or without ablation.
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Other
Acronym: COSA-RCT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04015765
Colonic Diseases, Colonic Polyps
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06807073
Colonic Diseases, Colonic Polyps
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06271941
Colonic Diseases, Colonic Polyps
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT04357158
Colonic Diseases, Colonic Polyps
Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
View Trial Details