Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06271941

Reducing Neoplasia Recurrence After Endoscopic Resection of Large Colorectal Polyps

Large (≥20mm) colorectal polyps often harbor areas of advanced neoplasia, making them immediate colorectal cancer (CRC) precursors. Such polyps have to be completely removed to prevent CRC and to avoid surgery and/or adjuvant therapy. The laterally spreading lesions (LSLs) are removed via endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). However, recurrence is common. New techniques for LSL resection (hybrid argon plasma coagulation (h-APC) margin and base ablation) have shown a reduction in recurrence following the interventions.

We hypothesize that performing hybrid argon plasma coagulation (h-APC) margin and base ablation during EMR of large (≥20mm) colorectal LSLs will lead to lower rates of lesion recurrence compared to Snare tip soft coagulation (STSC) margin ablation.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Daniel Von Renteln, MD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Julie Fleury

CONTACT

[email protected]

514-890-8000 ext. 30917

About this study

This trial is an open-label, two-arm, parallel-group, multicenter, randomized controlled superiority trial. Patients undergoing EMR will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo additional STSC margin ablation (control group and current standard of care) or h-APC ablation of the margins and base (experimental group).

Patients will be enrolled in the study before the endoscopy procedure, or in the outpatient clinic.

Eligible patients who have consented to participate in the study will be asked to take a standard colonoscopy preparation regimen before their scheduled procedure.

EMR intervention will be performed for all eligible patients with a large laterally spreading lesions (LSLs) by expert endoscopists. Only if a polyp meets inclusion criteria, the study subject will be enrolled and randomized into one of these 2 groups:

  • Group 1: EMR + h-APC margin and base thermal ablation
  • Group 2: EMR + STSC of the margin

The standard EMR technique will be used for the primary removal of all polyps. Submucosal injection will be used to lift the polyp from the muscularis propria. Injection will be used as per the current standard of care using a contrast agent and a lifting agent (e.g., NaCl 0.9% or Voluven). Snare electrocautery resection will be facilitated until complete visible removal of the complete polyp. Electrocautery snare technique will be facilitated using standard microprocessor-controlled electrocautery. If residual polyp tissue cannot be removed by a snare, other means such as cold snare (i.e., for small residual polyp tissue that cannot be engaged into standard snares) or avulsive methods will be used. Randomization will be performed after resection is complete and before thermal ablation. After the complete removal of the polyp, depending on the randomization group, h-APC or STSC techniques will be used for margin and base or only margin ablation of the post-EMR defect.

If multiple large polyps are found and removed, the study polyp will be marked with two tattoos 3 cm distal and 3 cm proximal to the lesion, to clearly identify the study polyp associated scar in the follow-up colonoscopy. Polyps will be sent to the pathology lab and evaluated according to standard practice by institutional pathologists. To determine the homogeneity and depth of h-APC margin ablation in the pathology lab, some ablated margins might be resected using the standard cold snare technique.

Telephone calls after 14 days following the EMR will be conducted to assess possible adverse events that occurred within the first 14 days after EMR.

Follow-up 1: Surveillance colonoscopy occurring 6 months after the EMR intervention for the assessment of recurrence (biopsy from the post-EMR site to be confirmed by pathology) following the intervention (h-APC) and the control (STSC) techniques.

Follow-up 2: Surveillance colonoscopy at 18 months (± 6 months) after the EMR intervention for the assessment of recurrence (biopsy from the post-EMR site to be confirmed by pathology) at FU1.

Patients with visible recurrence at the EMR site will undergo additional resection for complete eradication of recurrence. Patients with no visible but pathology-confirmed recurrence will be rescheduled for another colonoscopy with subsequent treatment of the post-EMR site and another follow-up colonoscopy for biopsies and confirmation of complete/incomplete eradication within 18 months after the initial EMR.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • adult ≥18 years old
  • patients undergoing EMR for a large (≥20mm) colorectal LSL
  • patients providing written and informed consent for study participation.

Exclusion criteria

  • inflammatory bowel disease;
  • non-elective colonoscopy;
  • poor general health (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification >III);
  • coagulopathy or thrombocytopenia (international normalized ratio ≥1.5 or platelets <50 x 109/L);
  • pedunculated polyps (Paris class Ip, Isp);
  • overt signs of deep submucosal invasive cancer (JNET 3);
  • biopsy proven invasive carcinoma in a potential study polyp.
  • Pregnant women

Treatment and study plan

Hybrid Argon Plasma Coagulation (h-APC)

Procedure

The hybrid argon plasma coagulation (h-APC) combines an ablation technique (APC) with the option for submucosal saline injection using a high-pressure water jet. The technique allows for the lifting of dysplastic epithelium, creating a cushion under the mucosa to facilitate the ablation of larger areas more thoroughly and with higher energy settings, while posing a low risk for side effects or complications.

Other names: h-APC

Snare tip soft coagulation (STSC)

Procedure

The Snare tip soft coagulation (STSC) involves using a snare to remove polyps, while simultaneously applying soft coagulation to the surrounding tissue using a specialized tip on the snare.

Other names: STSC

Primary outcomes

  1. Recurrence after colorectal EMR between the h-APC and STSC methods

    Time frame: 4 years

    Lesion recurrence at first follow-up after EMR of large (≥20mm) colorectal LSLs when performing STSC margin ablation or h-APC margin and base ablation. Defined by visual recurrence or pathology-confirmed hyperplastic, serrated or adenomatous histology of the same histology of the index lesion at the tattooed resection site on at least one of four random biopsies of resection scars. These will be evaluated from an intention to treat and per protocol standpoint.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Adverse event rates after EMR with STSC or h-APC

    Time frame: 4 years

    Adverse event rates after EMR of large (≥20mm) colorectal LSLs when performing EMR with STSC margin ablation or h-APC margin and base ablation. Defined as either a) delayed bleeding (defined as blood per rectum resulting in emergency room visit, unplanned hospitalization; endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical intervention) or b) delayed perforation (defined as endoscopic or radiologic evidence of air or luminal contents outside the gastrointestinal tract). These will be evaluated from an intention to treat and per protocol standpoint.

  2. Technical success of STSC or h-APC

    Time frame: 4 years

    Technical success of STSC or h-APC defined as achieving a complete uninterrupted ring ofcircumferential margin ablation for STSC and h-APC, without crossover to complete the margin ablation, and achieving 100% surface ablation of the resection base for h-APC.

  3. Lesion recurrence at the 18-month follow-up after EMR with STSC or h-APC

    Time frame: 4 years

    Lesion recurrence at the 18-month follow-up after EMR with STSC or h-APC

  4. High-grade dysplasia or colorectal cancer occurence after EMR during the 18-month follow-up period.

    Time frame: 4 years

    High-grade dysplasia or colorectal cancer occurence after EMR during the 18-month follow-up period at the resection site.

  5. CRC occurrence during the 18-month follow-up period

    Time frame: 4 years

    CRC occurrence after EMR during the 18-month follow-up period

Other outcomes

  1. Colonoscopies required to achieve lesion clearance after EMR with STSC or h-APC

    Time frame: 4 years

    Colonoscopies required to achieve lesion clearance, defined as no histologic recurrence at the resection scar on follow-up.

  2. EMR procedure time

    Time frame: 4 years

    EMR procedure time with STSC or h-APC

  3. STSC or h-APC ablation time

    Time frame: 4 years

  4. Loss to follow-up

    Time frame: 4 years

  5. Intestinal preservation 18 months after ablation

    Time frame: 4 years

    Defined as no surgical resection performed.

  6. Clinically significant delayed bleeding in the proximal colon after EMR with STSC or h-APC

    Time frame: 14 days

    Defined as blood per rectum resulting in emergency room visit, unplanned hospitalization; endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical intervention. Proximal defined as proximal to the splenic flexure.

  7. Clinically significant delayed bleeding in the distal colon after EMR with STSC or h-APC

    Time frame: 14 days

    Defined as blood per rectum resulting in emergency room visit, unplanned hospitalization; endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical intervention. Distal defined as splenic flexure and distal.

  8. Clinically significant delayed bleeding in the entire colon after EMR with STSC or h-APC

    Time frame: 14 days

    Defined as blood per rectum resulting in emergency room visit, unplanned hospitalization; endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical intervention.

  9. Delayed perforation after EMR with STSC or h-APC

    Time frame: 14 days

    Delayed perforation defined as endoscopic or radiologic evidence of air or luminal contents outside the gastrointestinal tract

  10. Any delayed bleeding after EMR

    Time frame: 14 days

    Any delayed bleeding after EMR, defined as blood per rectum after the procedure

  11. Defect closure time

    Time frame: 4 years

  12. Technical success for complete defect closure

    Time frame: 4 years

    Defined as adequate apposition of the mucosal defect margins without visible submucosal areas >3 mm along the closure line.

  13. Costs associated with procedures

    Time frame: 4 years

  14. Factors associated with recurrence after colorectal EMR between the h-APC and STSC methods

    Time frame: 4 years

    Lesion recurrence at first follow-up after EMR of large (≥20mm) colorectal LSLs when performing STSC margin ablation or h-APC margin and base ablation. Defined by pathology-confirmed hyperplastic, serrated or adenomatous histology of the same histology of the index lesion at the tattooed resection site on at least one of four random biopsies of resection scars. Factors such as age, sex, lesion size (20-29mm, ≥30mm; 20-39mm, ≥40mm), histology, location, difficulty (difficult defined as peri-appendiceal, on the ileocecal valve, resection previously attempted and failed by a referring endoscopist), use of epinephrine in submucosal injection, submucosal lifting solution, resection type (en bloc [i.e. in one piece] vs piecemeal), technical success, study site, endoscopist yearly EMR volume, presence of intraprocedural bleeding, utilization of adjunct resection methods, ileocecal or anus involvement, polyp histology/morphology will be evaluated.

  15. Factors associated with adverse event rates after EMR with STSC or h-APC

    Time frame: 30 days

    Adverse event rates after EMR of large (≥20mm) colorectal LSLs when performing EMR with STSC margin ablation or h-APC margin and base ablation. Defined as either a) delayed bleeding (defined as blood per rectum resulting in emergency room visit, unplanned hospitalization; endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical intervention) or b) delayed perforation (defined as endoscopic or radiologic evidence of air or luminal contents outside the gastrointestinal tract). Factors such as age, sex, lesion size, morphology, histology, location, complete/incomplete/no defect closure, prophylactic vessel ablation, base ablation, anticoagulant use will be evaluated

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Other

Registry information

Acronym: ABLATION

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2028
First posted
Feb 22, 2024
Registry last updated
Nov 25, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.