cemiplimab
Drugcemiplimab IV 350 mg, day 1
NCT Number: NCT07020065
Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer is often treated with a combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy. In patients over the age of 70, some are already in poor health and frail, requiring assistance with daily activities, for example. Older and/or frail individuals often do not tolerate standard-dose chemotherapy well, and their risk of side effects is higher than that of younger patients.
For this reason, the SAKK 18/24 study is investigating how effective and safe chemotherapy is in patients over 70 years of age when the chemotherapy drugs are administered at lower doses than usual. The aim of the study is to find a potentially effective and well-tolerated treatment for older people with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
Interested in participating?
Request Info70 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
HFR Fribourg, Fribourg, Villars-sur-Glâne, Switzerland
This randomized, open-label, phase II clinical trial evaluates the efficacy, safety, and overall treatment utility of reduced-dose platinum-doublet chemotherapy (rdCT) in combination with cemiplimab (cemi) versus cemiplimab monotherapy in older and/or frail patients with stage III/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and PD-L1 expression <50%. The study specifically addresses a major evidence gap for a vulnerable patient population often underrepresented in registrational trials.
Cemiplimab in combination with full-dose carboplatin-based doublet chemotherapy is a Swissmedic-approved first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC, based on data from EMPOWER-Lung 03. However, full-dose chemotherapy regimens (e.g., carboplatin AUC 5 + pemetrexed, paclitaxel, or gemcitabine) are frequently associated with prohibitive toxicity in elderly and/or frail patients. Over half of all newly diagnosed mNSCLC cases occur in individuals aged 70 or older, many of whom present with frailty or multimorbidity. While atezolizumab monotherapy has shown a survival benefit over single-agent chemotherapy in older, treatment-ineligible patients (IPSOS trial), overall outcomes remain suboptimal.
In clinical practice, rdCT regimens are commonly used in this patient population, despite limited prospective evidence. The present study uses the G8 screening tool-a validated geriatric assessment instrument-to identify patients at risk for increased treatment toxicity and to support treatment adaptation.
Objectives The primary objective is to compare overall survival (OS) between rdCT + cemiplimab and cemiplimab monotherapy. Secondary objectives include comparison of progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), adverse events (AE), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and overall treatment utility (OTU).
Design and Interventions This is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study enrolling approximately 156 patients (78 per arm) across ~17 sites in Switzerland. Eligible patients are ≥70 years old, have a G8 score ≤14 or are deemed unsuitable for full-dose chemotherapy, and have advanced or metastatic NSCLC without actionable genomic alterations and PD-L1 <50%.
Patients are randomized to one of two arms:
Cemiplimab maintenance continues until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or a maximum of 2 years. Treatment beyond progression is permitted in cases of oligoprogression amenable to local therapy.
Assessments Radiologic response assessments (CT ± CNS imaging) are performed every 6 weeks until week 12, then every 9 weeks until week 30, and every 12 weeks thereafter. HRQoL is assessed using NFLSI-17 and QLQ-ELD14 at baseline, every 6 weeks to week 12, every 9 weeks to week 30, and every 24 weeks thereafter.
Overall Treatment Utility (OTU) is assessed at the same intervals and incorporates:
Statistical Considerations With 128 OS events, the study is powered (80%) to detect an increase in median OS from 10.3 months (based on IPSOS trial) to 16 months in the experimental arm (one-sided alpha = 0.05). Sample size: 156 patients (allowing 5% attrition).
Time-to-event outcomes will be analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods with log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models. Response rates and adverse events will be compared using Fisher's exact or chi-square tests. Continuous variables (e.g., HRQoL scores) will be analyzed using Wilcoxon rank-sum or linear regression (mixed models as appropriate).
Quality Assurance and Data Integrity
Although not formally a registry, the trial employs registry-like quality control elements:
Conclusion This trial responds to the pressing need for evidence-based, tolerable, and effective treatment strategies for older and/or frail patients with advanced NSCLC. By leveraging geriatric screening tools and integrating real-world adaptations such as reduced-dose chemotherapy, this study aims to optimize oncologic outcomes while preserving quality of life and functional status. Findings will inform clinical decision-making for a frequently excluded patient group in oncology research.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
cemiplimab IV 350 mg, day 1
carboplatin IV AUC 3 day 1
pemetrexed IV 300 mg/m2 day 1 gemcitabine IV 600 mg/m2 day 1, d8
paclitaxel IV 50 mg/m2 day 1, d8
Time frame: From the date of randomization until the date of confirmed tumor progression according to RECIST 1.1 or death from any cause, assessed up to 1 year after end of treatment.
PFS is defined as time from randomization to confirmed tumor progression according to RECIST 1.1 or death due to any cause. Patients not experiencing an event will be censored at their last tumor assessment before starting a new anti-cancer treatment line (if any).
Time frame: From the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 1 year after end of treatment.
OS is defined as time from randomization to death due to any cause. Patients not experiencing an event will be censored at their last date known alive.
Time frame: From the date of randomization until the end of treatment, estimated up to 1 year after randomization.
Objective response is defined as any complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.1 criteria achieved during treatment. Patients without any tumor assessment or with non-evaluable response during treatment will be considered as failures for this endpoint
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Swiss Cancer Institute
Other
Reduced-dose Carboplatin-doublet-chemotherapy + Cemiplimab vs Cemiplimab Monotherapy in Treatment Naive Older and Frail Patients With Metastatic NSCLC With PD-L1 <50% A Multicentre Randomized Open-label Phase II Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07149649
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Aarau, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT07392658
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Roma, Roma (RM), Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT07363811
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Konya, Meram, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07688577
Advanced Solid Tumor, Bronchial Neoplasms
View Trial Details