Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07698795

Recovery and Quality of Life in Cervical Cancer Patients Using Vaginal Dilators After Radiotherapy

The goal of this longitudinal observational study is to understand the trajectory of Quality of Life (QoL) recovery in women with cervical cancer who have received definitive radiation therapy. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Do functional domains, such as physical, role, and social functioning, show significant and sustained improvement over the 12 months following treatment? How does the burden of treatment-related symptoms, including fatigue, nausea, and cervical cancer-specific symptoms, resolve during the one-year recovery period? Researchers will analyze changes in QoL scores over time to identify which clinical factors-such as time elapsed since treatment and baseline disease stage-serve as the most significant predictors of a patient's overall well-being.

Participants will:

* Complete standardized Quality of Life assessments using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the cervical cancer-specific QLQ-CX24 instruments. * Provide data at six specific intervals: baseline (pre-treatment) and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-radiotherapy. * Report on multiple functional scales, including physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social status. * Monitor and report symptom levels for various issues such as fatigue, pain, nausea, and sexual/vaginal functioning.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

This study investigates the longitudinal recovery trajectory and clinical predictors of Quality of Life (QoL) and vaginal morbidity in patients with cervical cancer following definitive radiation therapy. While combined External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT) and Intracavitary Radiation Therapy (ICRT/Brachytherapy) are highly effective for cancer control, they frequently lead to long-term physical sequelae, most notably radiation-induced vaginal stenosis and contraction. These changes can significantly impair sexual function and overall patient well-being.

Study Objectives and Design The research utilized a longitudinal design to track a cohort of 67 patients (mean age 51·75 ± 13·23 years) over a 12-month period. The primary objectives were to identify the clinical factors that predict the recovery of functional QoL domains.

Patients were assessed at six distinct time points: baseline (pre-treatment) and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-radiotherapy. QoL was measured using standardized instruments, including the EORTC QLQ-C30 (general health and functioning) and the EORTC QLQ-CX24 (cervical cancer-specific symptoms).

Clinical Predictors of Recovery

The study identifies several key independent variables that serve as predictors for post-treatment outcomes:

Time Post-Treatment: Time is a highly significant predictor for nearly all QoL domains. Acute symptoms (such as nausea, diarrhea, and fatigue) typically show the most dramatic improvement within the first 1 to 3 months.

Functional Stabilization: Functional domains, including physical and role functioning, show progressive improvement and typically peak and stabilize by the 6-to-12-month mark. Global QoL scores generally reach their highest stable levels (median 83·33) by 6 months post-treatment.

Baseline Clinical Factors: Factors such as clinical stage (with Stage IIIC1 being the most prevalent at 28·79%) and tumor extension to the upper vagina (present in 61·19% of the cohort) influence the starting QoL scores and the overall slope of the recovery curve.

Symptom Resolution and Functional Gains

Longitudinal analysis revealed significant improvements across multiple QoL metrics compared to baseline:

Symptom Burden: Scores for Fatigue, Nausea/Vomiting, and Diarrhea decreased significantly across all follow-up time points (P<0⋅001).

Functional Domains: Significant gains were sustained in Physical, Role, and Social functioning beginning as early as 1 to 3 months post-treatment.

Cervical Cancer-Specific Symptoms: The specific symptom burden (QLQ-CX24) dropped sharply and remained low throughout the year. Sexual function and vaginal aspect scores showed significant improvements later in the recovery process, specifically between 6 and 12 months.

In conclusion, this study demonstrates that while radiation therapy causes significant initial morbidity, the recovery of QoL follows a predictable timeline influenced primarily by time and adherence to vaginal dilator therapy. The dilator acts as a critical intervention to maintain anatomical integrity while the patient's functional roles and energy levels are restored over the first year of survivorship.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • A confirmed diagnosis of cervical cancer, including various histological types such as Squamous cell carcinoma (85.07%), Adenocarcinoma (13.43%), or Small cell carcinoma.
  • Completion of definitive radiation therapy, specifically the combination of External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT) and Intracavitary Radiation Therapy (ICRT/Brachytherapy).
  • Participants identified as female.
  • Patients were included across clinical stages I through IV, with Stage IIIC1 being the most common (28.79%).
  • Willingness to participate in a 12-month longitudinal study involving assessments at six distinct time points: baseline (pre-treatment) and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-radiotherapy.

Exclusion criteria

  • Presence of lesions that make it impossible to use the vaginal dilator device.
  • Chronic or severe bleeding that prevents the safe or effective use of the vaginal dilator.
  • Emergency medical conditions or a clinical necessity for alternative treatments following the initial radiation therapy.
  • Inability to attend follow-up visits or comply with the monitoring guidelines established in the study protocol.

Additionally, the sources define discontinuation criteria for participants who have already entered the study:

  • The participant requests to withdraw from the project for any reason.
  • The participant receives incomplete treatment due to the progression or specific nature of the disease.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Quality of Life (QoL) Scores

    Time frame: Data is collected at six specific intervals: Baseline (pre-treatment), and then at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-treatment.

    This outcome assesses the longitudinal trajectory of a patient's overall health status, functional abilities, and symptom burden following radiotherapy.

    Assessment Tools: QoL is measured using two standardized instruments: the EORTC QLQ-C30 (30-item core questionnaire for general cancer patients) and the EORTC QLQ-CX24 (24-item module specific to cervical cancer).

    Scoring: All scales and single-item measures are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. For the Global Health Status and functional scales (Physical, Role, Social, Emotional, and Cognitive), higher scores represent a higher/better level of functioning. For symptom scales (such as Fatigue, Pain, and Nausea), higher scores represent a higher level of symptom burden or distress.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Chulabhorn Cancer Center

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Impact of Vaginal Dilator Use on Vaginal Morbidity and Quality of Life Following Definitive Radiation Therapy for Cervical Cancer.

Acronym: QoL

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Jul 13, 2026
Registry last updated
Jul 13, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.