Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06969924

Real-World Data on the Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Adult Patients With Congenital Heart Disease

This study aims to evaluate the real-world effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in adult patients with congenital heart disease (ACHD). Specifically, it seeks to determine whether CRT improves clinical outcomes in this unique patient population and to identify factors associated with a favorable response to therapy.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

Leiden, South Holland, 2333ZA, Netherlands

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Anastasia D. Egorova, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+31 71 5262020

Bert A.C. Zwaenepoel, MD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Ralph M.L. Neijenhuis, MD

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is well-established in acquired heart failure, but evidence in ACHD remains limited. Current guidelines, extrapolated from non-congenital populations, may not fully address the anatomical and electrophysiological complexities in ACHD.

This retrospective cohort study aims to investigate the real-world efficacy and safety of CRT in adult patients with congenital heart disease (ACHD). The study includes consecutive ACHD patients who underwent either de novo CRT implantation or upgrade procedures, starting from January 2014.

The primary objectives are to evaluate changes in QRS duration, systemic ventricular function, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class. The study aims to further examine the impact of CRT in specific ACHD subgroups, including patients with systemic right ventricles (vs. systemic left ventricles), those with non-left bundle branch block (non-LBBB) morphology (vs. LBBB), and those with upgrade procedures (vs. de novo implants).

Data collection is based on retrospective review of electronic health records, including patient demographics, clinical characteristics, device-related procedural details, and follow-up data. Outcomes are assessed using standardized echocardiographic and electrocardiographic measurements, alongside clinical evaluations.

The study aims to provide comprehensive real-world insights into the efficacy and safety of CRT in the diverse ACHD population and to identify predictors of favorable response, ultimately supporting more individualized decision-making in this complex patient group.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • ACHD patients who underwent CRT implantation

Exclusion criteria

  • Less than 18 years old on the moment of CRT implantation
  • Patient objection to the use of retrospective data

Treatment and study plan

cardiac resynchronization therapy

Device

Cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker or defibrillator with a transvenous or epicardial systemic ventricle lead

Primary outcomes

  1. QRS duration

    Time frame: From enrollment through study completion, with an average follow-up duration of 1 year.

    Evaluation of the longitudinal effect of CRT on the duration (in ms) of the QRS interval on surface ECG

  2. Systemic ventricle function class

    Time frame: From enrollment through study completion, with an average follow-up duration of 1 year.

    Evaluation of the longitudinal effect of CRT on the echocardiographic functional classification of the systemic ventricle (i.e., normal, mildly reduced, moderately reduced, severely reduced)

  3. NYHA functional class

    Time frame: From enrollment through study completion, with an average follow-up duration of 1 year.

    Evaluation of the longitudinal effect of CRT on the NYHA functional classification (i.e., Class I, II, III, IV)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical - Mortality

    Time frame: From enrollment through study completion, with an average follow-up duration of 1 year.

    Death from any cause during the study period

  2. Clinical - Heart failure hospitalization

    Time frame: From enrollment through study completion, with an average follow-up duration of 1 year.

    At least one overnight stay with cardiac decompensation as the primary reason for hospitalization

  3. Clinical - CV hospitalization other than HF

    Time frame: From enrollment through study completion, with an average follow-up duration of 1 year.

    At least one overnight stay due to any primary cardiovascular reason, excluding heart failure

  4. Clinical - Urgent heart failure visit

    Time frame: From enrollment through study completion, with an average follow-up duration of 1 year.

    An unplanned medical contact requiring decongestion, but no overnight stay in the hospital

  5. Clinical - Urgent CV visit other than HF

    Time frame: From enrollment through study completion, with an average follow-up duration of 1 year.

    An unplanned medical contact due to any primary cardiovascular reason, excluding heart failure and without overnight stay in the hospital

  6. Clinical - Enlisting for LVAD

    Time frame: From enrollment through study completion, with an average follow-up duration of 1 year.

    Enlisting for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation during the study period

  7. Clinical - Enlisting for HTX

    Time frame: One year after implantation

    Enlisting for heart transplantation (HTX) during the study period.

  8. Clinical - Periprocedurel complications

    Time frame: From enrollment through study completion, with an average follow-up duration of 1 year.

    Any complications occurring during or immediately after the procedure, including but not limited to pneumothorax, infection, bleeding, lead dislodgement, and arrhythmic events.

  9. CIED-related - Threshold systemic ventricular lead

    Time frame: From enrollment through study completion, with an average follow-up duration of 1 year.

    Evaluation of the longitudinal change of the minimum pacing threshold required for consistent ventricular capture, measured in volts (V) at a specific pulse width (ms)

  10. CIED-related - Impedance systemic ventricular lead

    Time frame: From enrollment through study completion, with an average follow-up duration of 1 year.

    Evaluation of the longitudinal change of the systemic ventricular lead impedance, measured in ohms (Ω), reflecting the integrity of the pacing system and lead-tissue interface.

  11. CIED-related - R-wave sensing systemic ventricular lead

    Time frame: From enrollment through study completion, with an average follow-up duration of 1 year.

    Evaluation of the longitudinal change of the R-wave amplitude of the systemic ventricular lead, measured in millivolts (mV), indicating the ability of the system to correctly sense the ventricular depolarization

  12. CIED-related - ICD therapy

    Time frame: From enrollment through study completion, with an average follow-up duration of 1 year.

    Incidence of (in)appropriate ICD therapies, including shock or antitachycardia pacing

  13. Medication - GDMT use

    Time frame: From enrollment through study completion, with an average follow-up duration of 1 year.

    Evaluation of the longitudinal change in the use of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure, including RAAS inhibitors (ACEi/ARB/ARNI), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), beta-blockers (BB), diuretics, and SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i).

  14. Clinical parameter - weight

    Time frame: From enrollment through study completion, with an average follow-up duration of 1 year.

    Evaluation of the longitudinal effect of CRT on weight (kg)

  15. Clinical parameter - systolic blood pressure

    Time frame: From enrollment through study completion, with an average follow-up duration of 1 year.

    Evaluation of the longitudinal effect of CRT on systolic blood pressure (mmHg)

  16. Clinical parameter - diastolic blood pressure

    Time frame: From enrollment through study completion, with an average follow-up duration of 1 year.

    Evaluation of the longitudinal effect of CRT on diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)

  17. Clinical parameter - heart rate

    Time frame: From enrollment through study completion, with an average follow-up duration of 1 year.

    Evaluation of the longitudinal effect of CRT on heart rate (beats per minute)

  18. Laboratory parameter - sodium

    Time frame: From enrollment through study completion, with an average follow-up duration of 1 year.

    Evaluation of the longitudinal effect of CRT on serum sodium (mmol/L)

  19. Laboratory parameter - creatinine

    Time frame: From enrollment through study completion, with an average follow-up duration of 1 year.

    Evaluation of the longitudinal effect of CRT on serum creatinine (μmol/L)

  20. Laboratory parameter - eGFR

    Time frame: From enrollment through study completion, with an average follow-up duration of 1 year.

    Evaluation of the longitudinal effect of CRT on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, ml/min/1.73m2)

  21. Laboratory parameter - NT-proBNP

    Time frame: From enrollment through study completion, with an average follow-up duration of 1 year.

    Evaluation of the longitudinal effect of CRT on serum NT-proBNP (ng/L)

  22. Laboratory parameter - hs-TnT

    Time frame: From enrollment through study completion, with an average follow-up duration of 1 year.

    Evaluation of the longitudinal effect of CRT on serum high-sensitivity troponin T concentrations (ng/L)

  23. Echocardiographic parameter - subpulmonary ventricle function class

    Time frame: From enrollment through study completion, with an average follow-up duration of 1 year.

    Evaluation of the longitudinal effect of CRT on the echocardiographic functional classification of the subpulmonary ventricle (i.e., normal, mildly reduced, moderately reduced, severely reduced)

  24. Echocardiographic parameter - SAVV regurgitant grade

    Time frame: From enrollment through study completion, with an average follow-up duration of 1 year.

    Evaluation of the longitudinal effect of CRT on the regurgitant grade of the systemic atrioventricular valve, classified as grade I, II, III, or IV.

  25. Echocardiographic parameter - PAVV regurgitant grade

    Time frame: From enrollment through study completion, with an average follow-up duration of 1 year.

    Evaluation of the longitudinal effect of CRT on the regurgitant grade of the pulmonary atrioventricular valve, classified as grade I, II, III, or IV.

  26. Echocardiographic parameter - sPAP

    Time frame: From enrollment through study completion, with an average follow-up duration of 1 year.

    Evaluation of the longitudinal effect of CRT on systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP), estimated by echocardiography.

  27. Echocardiographic parameter - IVC diameter

    Time frame: From enrollment through study completion, with an average follow-up duration of 1 year.

    Evaluation of the longitudinal effect of CRT on inferior vena cava diameter and its collapsibility during respiration, as assessed by echocardiography.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Anastasia D. Egorova, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+31 71 5262020

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Leiden University Medical Center

Other

Registry information

Acronym: RECORD-CHD

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
May 14, 2025
Registry last updated
May 14, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.