Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05947123

Real-life Study of the Efficacy of Management of Migraine Patients After Failure of 2 Prophylactic Treatments

This is a real-life, observational, single-center cohort study to describe the efficacy of prophylactic treatment in patients after failure of at least 2 prophylactic treatments. Patients included in the study will be followed up in consultations or day hospitals according to their usual care, and will be asked to complete the MIgraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS), Headache Impact Test short-form (HIT-6), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale and Work and Personal Activities Impairment (WPAI) questionnaires at each visit.

Data describing their care will be extracted from computerized patient records.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

CHR Metz-Thionville/Hopital de Mercy

Metz, 57085, France

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with Migraine [International Headache Society (IHS) criteria 2013, revised 2018] with or without aura
  • Monthly number of attacks ≥ 8 for at least 3 months
  • Indication for prophylactic treatment
  • For eptinezumab: resistance to at least 2 conventional disease-modifying therapies
  • Agrees to use data for research purposes

Exclusion criteria

  • Vascular history: myocardial infarction (MI), unstable angina or coronary bypass surgery, stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), Peripheral Arterial Disease of the Lower Limbs (PAD), uncontrolled hypertension
  • Need for analgesics for a cause other than migraine
  • Difficulty in understanding French language or cognitive impairment that compromises completion of self-questionnaires.

Treatment and study plan

Patient health care observational follow up after 2 prophylactic tratments

Behavioral

Real-life, observational, single-center cohort study to describe the efficacy of prophylactic treatment in patients after failure of at least 2 prophylactic treatments. Patients included in the study will be followed up in consultations or day hospitals according to their usual care, and will be asked to complete the MIDAS, HIT-6, PGIC, HAD and WPAI questionnaires at each visit. Data describing their care will be extracted from computerized patient records.

Primary outcomes

  1. Headache Impact Test in patients with migraine at 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months after prophylactic treatments

    Using HIT-6 (Headache Impact Test short-form) questionnaire which addresses six main domains affected by headaches, including pain, social functioning, role functioning, cognitive functioning, vitality and psychological stress. This survey is extremely useful for screening and monitoring how headaches affect patients in their day-to-day lives over time.

    Each item is answered on a 5-point Likert scale (6 = never, 8 = rarely, 10 = sometimes, 11 = very often, 13 = always). The scoring of the HIT-6 was derived to approximate the total score obtained from a larger battery of items, using results from item response theory (IRT) [10]. The final score is obtained from simple summation of the six items.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Headache-related disability in patients with migraine at 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months after prophylactic treatments

    MIDAS scale (Migraine Disability Assessment) measures headache-related disability and improve doctor-patient communication about the functional consequences of migraine. The questionnaire was based on five disability questions that focus on lost time in three domains: schoolwork or work for pay; household work or chores; and family, social, and leisure activities.

    This instrument is scored as follows: 5 to 10 indicates little or no disability, 10 to 20 indicates moderate disability, and higher than 20 denotes severe disability.

  2. Anxiety and Depression state evaluation in patients with migraine at 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months after prophylactic treatments

    Using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) : is a 14-item measure designed to assess anxiety and depression symptoms in medical patients, with emphasis on reducing the impact of physical illness on the total score.

    The depression items tend to focus on the anhedonic symptoms of depression. Items are rated on a 4-point severity scale.

    The HADS produces two scales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D), differentiating the two states. Scores of greater than or equal to 11 on either scale indicate a definitive case.

  3. Migraine occurence in patients with migraine at 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months after prophylactic treatments

    Number of migraine days

  4. Crisis treatments in patients with migraine at 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months after prophylactic treatments

    Number of crisis treatments taken

  5. Patient Global Impression of Change in patients with migraine at 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months after prophylactic treatments

    Using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) score: a 7 point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement.

    Patients rate their change as "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," or "very much worse."

  6. Work and Personal Activities Impairment in patients with migraine at 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months after prophylactic treatments

    Using Work and Personal Activities Impairment (WPAI) score : a well validated instrument to measure impairments in work and activities.

    WPAI scores are based on 1-item (presenteeism, activitity impairment), 2-items (absenteeism) and multiple items (overall work productivity).

  7. Most Bothersome Symptom in patients with migraine at 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months after prophylactic treatments

    Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS)

  8. Days off work at 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months after prophylactic treatments

    Number of days off work

  9. Emergency room visits at 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months after prophylactic treatments

    Number of emergency room visits

  10. Type of prophylactic treatment used at 12 months

    Time frame: 12 months after prophylactic treatments

    Type of prophylactic treatment

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Real-life Study of the Efficacy of Management of Migraine Patients After Failure of 2 Prophylactic Treatments: a Retrospective Study

Acronym: EVIREMIG

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Jul 17, 2023
Registry last updated
Aug 9, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.