CHR Metz-Thionville/Hopital de Mercy
Metz, 57085, France
NCT Number: NCT05947123
This is a real-life, observational, single-center cohort study to describe the efficacy of prophylactic treatment in patients after failure of at least 2 prophylactic treatments. Patients included in the study will be followed up in consultations or day hospitals according to their usual care, and will be asked to complete the MIgraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS), Headache Impact Test short-form (HIT-6), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale and Work and Personal Activities Impairment (WPAI) questionnaires at each visit.
Data describing their care will be extracted from computerized patient records.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Metz, 57085, France
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Real-life, observational, single-center cohort study to describe the efficacy of prophylactic treatment in patients after failure of at least 2 prophylactic treatments. Patients included in the study will be followed up in consultations or day hospitals according to their usual care, and will be asked to complete the MIDAS, HIT-6, PGIC, HAD and WPAI questionnaires at each visit. Data describing their care will be extracted from computerized patient records.
Time frame: 12 months after prophylactic treatments
Using HIT-6 (Headache Impact Test short-form) questionnaire which addresses six main domains affected by headaches, including pain, social functioning, role functioning, cognitive functioning, vitality and psychological stress. This survey is extremely useful for screening and monitoring how headaches affect patients in their day-to-day lives over time.
Each item is answered on a 5-point Likert scale (6 = never, 8 = rarely, 10 = sometimes, 11 = very often, 13 = always). The scoring of the HIT-6 was derived to approximate the total score obtained from a larger battery of items, using results from item response theory (IRT) [10]. The final score is obtained from simple summation of the six items.
Time frame: 12 months after prophylactic treatments
MIDAS scale (Migraine Disability Assessment) measures headache-related disability and improve doctor-patient communication about the functional consequences of migraine. The questionnaire was based on five disability questions that focus on lost time in three domains: schoolwork or work for pay; household work or chores; and family, social, and leisure activities.
This instrument is scored as follows: 5 to 10 indicates little or no disability, 10 to 20 indicates moderate disability, and higher than 20 denotes severe disability.
Time frame: 12 months after prophylactic treatments
Using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) : is a 14-item measure designed to assess anxiety and depression symptoms in medical patients, with emphasis on reducing the impact of physical illness on the total score.
The depression items tend to focus on the anhedonic symptoms of depression. Items are rated on a 4-point severity scale.
The HADS produces two scales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D), differentiating the two states. Scores of greater than or equal to 11 on either scale indicate a definitive case.
Time frame: 12 months after prophylactic treatments
Number of migraine days
Time frame: 12 months after prophylactic treatments
Number of crisis treatments taken
Time frame: 12 months after prophylactic treatments
Using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) score: a 7 point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement.
Patients rate their change as "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," or "very much worse."
Time frame: 12 months after prophylactic treatments
Using Work and Personal Activities Impairment (WPAI) score : a well validated instrument to measure impairments in work and activities.
WPAI scores are based on 1-item (presenteeism, activitity impairment), 2-items (absenteeism) and multiple items (overall work productivity).
Time frame: 12 months after prophylactic treatments
Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS)
Time frame: 12 months after prophylactic treatments
Number of days off work
Time frame: 12 months after prophylactic treatments
Number of emergency room visits
Time frame: 12 months after prophylactic treatments
Type of prophylactic treatment
Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville
Other
Real-life Study of the Efficacy of Management of Migraine Patients After Failure of 2 Prophylactic Treatments: a Retrospective Study
Acronym: EVIREMIG
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04530110
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07699549
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Madrid, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT07720895
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Athens, Greece
View Trial DetailsNCT06158737
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial Details