Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07699549

Long-term Atogepant in Real-world Practice

This prospective multicentre observational study aims to evaluate the long-term effectiveness, safety, tolerability, and treatment persistence of atogepant for migraine prevention in routine clinical practice. Adult patients with migraine initiating atogepant across 15 tertiary Headache Units in Spain are followed for 12 months. Clinical outcomes, including monthly headache days, monthly migraine days, medication overuse, adverse events, treatment discontinuation, and patient-reported outcomes in a subset of participants, are assessed at baseline and after 3, 6, and 12 months. The study also characterizes different response trajectories, including sustained, delayed, and transient responses, in a real-world population with high disease burden and multiple prior preventive treatment failures.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Preventive migraine therapies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway have transformed clinical practice, particularly monoclonal antibodies and, more recently, gepants. Atogepant, an oral CGRP receptor antagonist, has demonstrated efficacy and safety in randomized controlled trials and extensions across episodic, chronic, and treatment-refractory migraine populations. However, these studies are based on highly selected cohorts with limited external validity. In routine clinical practice, patients present with high disease burden, multiple preventive treatment failures, prior exposure to CGRP-targeted therapies, medication overuse, and psychiatric comorbidities, all of which may influence outcomes. Although short- and mid-term real-world data support clinically meaningful benefit within 3-6 months, evidence beyond this period remains limited, particularly regarding long-term effectiveness, tolerability, and treatment persistence, as well as sustained, delayed, or transient response trajectories.

This prospective multicentre observational study was conducted within the GEMA (GEpants in MigrAine-Atogepant) Project across 15 tertiary Headache Units in Spain. Adults with migraine initiating atogepant in routine clinical practice were consecutively enrolled between June 2024 and March 2025 and followed for 12 months. Data were collected at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months using standardized REDCap case report forms through structured interviews. Variables included sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, migraine phenotype, disease duration, prior preventive treatment failures, concomitant preventive therapies, monthly headache days (MHD), monthly migraine days (MMD), analgesic overuse, adverse events, and treatment discontinuation. Definitions were based on ICHD-3 criteria. In a subset, patient-reported outcomes were assessed using validated instruments: Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). Analyses were performed using both all-available-observation and complete-case approaches, without imputation of missing outcome data.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged ≥18 years.
  • Diagnosis of migraine with or without aura established by a headache specialist according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3), including both chronic and episodic migraine.
  • History of migraine of at least 1 year duration.
  • Stable preventive migraine treatment (if any) for at least the previous 3 months.
  • Normal neurological examination.
  • Fulfilment of national health system reimbursement criteria for atogepant treatment.

Exclusion criteria

  • Cognitive impairment or any other condition that, in the investigator's opinion, may prevent the patient from reliably distinguishing prodromal symptoms.
  • Presence of other active primary or secondary headache disorders, except medication overuse headache or infrequent tension-type headache.

Treatment and study plan

Atogepant 60 mg

Drug

Atogepant was administered as preventive treatment for migraine in routine clinical practice. Treatment initiation, dose selection, dose modifications, and discontinuation were determined by the treating physician according to the approved prescribing information and routine clinical practice. As this was an observational study, no study-specific intervention or randomization was performed.

Other names: Atogepant, Aquipta

Headache diary

Other

Patients systematically recorded monthly headache days, monthly migraine days, and use of acute medication throughout follow-up.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

Other

Patients completed standardized validated questionnaires including HIT-6, HADS, and ISI at predefined follow-up visits to assess migraine-related disability and associated comorbidities.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in monthly headache days (MHD)

    Time frame: From baseline (initiation of atogepant treatment) to 12 months of follow-up.

    Monthly headache days (MHD) will be assessed at baseline and after 3, 6, and 12 months of atogepant treatment to evaluate clinical effectiveness in routine clinical practice.

  2. Change from baseline in monthly migraine days (MMD).

    Time frame: From baseline (initiation of atogepant treatment) to 12 months of follow-up.

    Monthly migraine days (MMD) will be assessed at baseline and after 3, 6, and 12 months of atogepant treatment to evaluate clinical effectiveness in routine clinical practice.

  3. Proportion of patients achieving ≥30%, ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% response rates over 12 months.

    Time frame: From baseline (initiation of atogepant treatment) to 12 months of follow-up.

    The proportion of patients achieving ≥30%, ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% reduction from baseline in monthly headache days (MHD) and monthly migraine days (MMD) will be assessed over 12 months.

  4. Persistence of treatment response

    Time frame: From baseline (initiation of atogepant treatment) to 12 months of follow-up.

    Persistence of treatment response will be assessed as the proportion of patients who maintain their clinical response between Months 6 and 12.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Characterization of sustained, late, and ultra-late treatment response

    Time frame: From baseline (initiation of atogepant treatment) to 12 months of follow-up.

    Patients will be classified as sustained, late, or ultra-late responders according to the predefined response criteria, and the proportion of patients in each response category will be assessed over 12 months.

  2. Changes in migraine-related disability - HIT-6

    Time frame: From baseline (initiation of atogepant treatment) to 12 months of follow-up.

    Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) total score will be assessed at baseline and during follow-up in the subset of patients with available data.

  3. Changes in psychiatric comorbidities - HADS

    Time frame: From baseline (initiation of atogepant treatment) to 12 months of follow-up.

    Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) total score will be assessed at baseline and during follow-up in the subset of patients with available data.

  4. Changes in migraine-related comorbidities - ISI

    Time frame: From baseline (initiation of atogepant treatment) to 12 months of follow-up.

    Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) total score will be assessed at baseline and during follow-up in the subset of patients with available data.

  5. Clinical predictors of sustained response at 12 months

    Time frame: From baseline (initiation of atogepant treatment) to 12 months of follow-up.

    Baseline clinical characteristics associated with sustained response at Month 12 will be evaluated. Sustained response will be defined as achieving a ≥50% reduction from baseline in monthly headache days (MHD) and monthly migraine days (MMD).

  6. Impact of prior exposure to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies on treatment response

    Time frame: From baseline (initiation of atogepant treatment) to 12 months of follow-up.

    Treatment response will be compared according to prior anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody exposure, number of prior anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies, and prior target (ligand vs receptor).

  7. Long-term safety of atogepant

    Time frame: From baseline (initiation of atogepant treatment) to 12 months of follow-up.

    Long-term safety will be assessed by recording adverse events, treatment discontinuation, and reasons for treatment discontinuation over 12 months, stratified by follow-up interval (0-3, 3-6, and 6-12 months).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Fundación de Investigación Biomédica - Hospital Universitario de La Princesa

Other

Collaborators

  • Fundación Jimenez Diaz de Madrid
  • Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa
  • Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid
  • Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon
  • Hospital San Carlos, Madrid
  • Hospital Son Espases
  • Hospital Torrejón de Ardoz
  • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
  • Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón
  • Hospital Universitario Getafe
  • Hospital Universitario La Paz
  • Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada
  • Hospital Virgen del Puerto

Registry information

Official study title

Long-term Atogepant for Treatment-resistant Migraine in Real-world Clinical Practice: 12-month Result

Acronym: GEMA PROJECT

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jul 13, 2026
Registry last updated
Jul 22, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.