Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06423417

RCT: the Effectiveness of LifeHack in Improving Mental Wellbeing in University Students.

Psychological issues are common among university students and affect mental wellbeing. The Caring Universities (CU) project, involving nine Dutch universities, aims to enhance students' mental health through an annual online questionnaire and a platform offering guided eHealth interventions. One intervention, LifeHack, utilizes cognitive behavioral therapy-based modules to improve mental wellbeing by enhancing resilience and life skills. The effects of LifeHack with pre-post measurements (total n = 216 at post-test) found found that LifeHack led to improvements in mental wellbeing, but dropout rates were influenced by lack of motivation and module relevance. A personalized version of LifeHack is being developed to address these issues and will be evaluated in an RCT to assess its effectiveness in improving mental wellbeing and related outcomes among university students.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

16 year–99 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

VU Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Psychological problems are prevalent among university students and are associated with lower mental wellbeing and resilience. Universities provide an excellent environment for students to enhance mental wellbeing, resilience, and acquire life skills.

Caring Universities (CU) is an internationally embedded consortium of nine Dutch universities aimed at improving students' mental wellbeing. The CU project consists of two components: 1) an annual online questionnaire assessing students' mental health; and 2) a platform offering free, guided eHealth interventions to enhance mental well-being.

One of the interventions on the CU platform - called LifeHack - seeks to enhance mental wellbeing by increasing resilience, teaching life skills, and strengthening mental wellbeing. LifeHack is a guided eHealth intervention based on cognitive behavioural therapy, comprising 13 modules of approximately 30 minutes each focusing on four themes (mood management, productivity, self-worth, and relationships). We investigated the effects of LifeHack with pre-post measurements (total n = 216 at post-test) and found that after following LifeHack, mental wellbeing improved with small to moderate effect sizes. Additionally, students reported satisfaction with the programme and the eCoach. However, participants indicated lack of motivation and early symptom reduction as important reasons for drop-out. Furthermore, the diverse topics covered in LifeHack may not be relevant to all students, leading to more dropouts.

Currently, there are two versions of LifeHack: one 'structured', where modules must be completed in order, and one 'free choice', where all modules are available from the start and none are mandatory. For the proposed study, the free choice version of LifeHack will be used and adapted in co-creation with students as follows: participants will be asked which topics they find most important and want to work on. Based on their answers, a personalized selection of modules will be presented, and students can choose which module to start with. Each module is standalone, allowing students to proceed to another module or stop after completing one or more. Each module has a clear structure, beginning with goal formulation and concluding with an action plan. The new adapted version of LifeHack will be personalized and tailored for each student, aiming to improve motivation and reduce dropout rates.

With the current study, we aim to examine the effectiveness of the adapted version of LifeHack in an RCT to enhance mental wellbeing in university students. Secondary objectives include investigating differences between the intervention and control groups on students' self-report questionnaire resilience scores, depression scores, anxiety scores, stress-related scores, and mental health quality of life scores (pretest vs post-test). Additional outcomes include satisfaction with the programme and the eCoach, as well as adherence to the intervention.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Being fluent in Dutch and/or English
  • Being enrolled as a student at one of the 9 participating universities
  • Being 16 years of age or older
  • Having access to a PC or mobile device with internet access
  • Provide informed consent before participation
  • Score of 50 or lower on the MHC-SF. This is 1 SD above the mean baseline score of participants of LifeHack. This inclusion criterion ensures no students with optimal mental wellbeing are included because they will not be able to show any change.

Treatment and study plan

LifeHack

Behavioral

See arm description

Primary outcomes

  1. Mental wellbeing (MHC-SF)

    Time frame: T0 (baseline), T1 (4 weeks post-baseline active group), T2 (4 weeks post-baseline wait list group), T3 (4 weeks post-T2 wait list group), T4 (6 months post-baseline both groups)

    Mental Health Continuum-Short Form, MHC-SF (Lamers et al., 2011).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Resilience (BRS)

    Time frame: T0 (baseline), T1 (4 weeks post-baseline active group), T2 (4 weeks post-baseline wait list group), T3 (4 weeks post-T2 wait list group), T4 (6 months post-baseline both groups)

    Brief Resilience Scale (Smith et al., 2008).

  2. Depressive symptoms (PHQ-9)

    Time frame: T0 (baseline), T1 (4 weeks post-baseline active group), T2 (4 weeks post-baseline wait list group), T3 (4 weeks post-T2 wait list group), T4 (6 months post-baseline both groups)

    Patient Health Questionnaire - 9, PHQ-9 (Kroenke et al., 2001).

  3. Stress related symptoms (PSS-10)

    Time frame: T0 (baseline), T1 (4 weeks post-baseline active group), T2 (4 weeks post-baseline wait list group), T3 (4 weeks post-T2 wait list group), T4 (6 months post-baseline both groups)

    Perceived Stress Scale-10, PSS-10 (Cohen, 1988).

  4. Symptoms of anxiety (GAD-7)

    Time frame: T0 (baseline), T1 (4 weeks post-baseline active group), T2 (4 weeks post-baseline wait list group), T3 (4 weeks post-T2 wait list group), T4 (6 months post-baseline both groups)

    Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale, GAD-7 (Spitzer et al., 2006).

  5. Quality of life (MHQoL)

    Time frame: T0 (baseline), T1 (4 weeks post-baseline active group), T2 (4 weeks post-baseline wait list group), T3 (4 weeks post-T2 wait list group), T4 (6 months post-baseline both groups)

    Mental Health Quality of Life questionnaire, MHQoL (Krugten et al., 2022).

  6. Demographics

    Time frame: T0 (baseline)

    E.g. gender, age, nationality

Other outcomes

  1. Depression and anxiety (PHQ-4) after each module.

    Time frame: After each module (approximately once per week)

    Patient Health Questionnaire - 4 (Kroenke et al., 2009). After each module, the PHQ-4 will be assessed in both groups.

  2. Client satisfaction (CSQ-8)

    Time frame: 4 weeks post-baseline active group and 4 weeks post-T2 wait list group.

    The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire, CSQ-8 (Larsen et al., 1979)

  3. E-coach evaluation (WAI-I)

    Time frame: 4 weeks post-baseline active group and 4 weeks post-T2 wait list group.

    We will also ask participants to evaluate the e-coach at the post-test. The questions about e-coach evaluation will be based on the Working Alliance Inventory for Guided Internet Interventions (WAI-I) (Gómez Penedo et al., 2020)

  4. Adherence (Log info)

    Time frame: T1 (4 weeks post-baseline active group), T2 (4 weeks post-baseline wait list group), T3 (4 weeks post-T2 wait list group), T4 (6 months post-baseline both groups)

    Adherence will be measured by the total number of completed sessions, time spent on the platform, and the number of logins.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Sanne van Luenen, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

0031-715277957

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Universiteit Leiden

Other

Collaborators

  • Avans University of applied sciences
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • InHolland University of Applied Sciences
  • Maastricht University
  • Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences
  • University of Amsterdam
  • Utrecht University
  • VU University of Amsterdam

Registry information

Official study title

LifeHack: RCT Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Guided E-health Programme in Improving Mental Wellbeing in University Students.

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
May 21, 2024
Registry last updated
Jun 22, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.