LifeHack
BehavioralSee arm description
NCT Number: NCT06423417
Psychological issues are common among university students and affect mental wellbeing. The Caring Universities (CU) project, involving nine Dutch universities, aims to enhance students' mental health through an annual online questionnaire and a platform offering guided eHealth interventions. One intervention, LifeHack, utilizes cognitive behavioral therapy-based modules to improve mental wellbeing by enhancing resilience and life skills. The effects of LifeHack with pre-post measurements (total n = 216 at post-test) found found that LifeHack led to improvements in mental wellbeing, but dropout rates were influenced by lack of motivation and module relevance. A personalized version of LifeHack is being developed to address these issues and will be evaluated in an RCT to assess its effectiveness in improving mental wellbeing and related outcomes among university students.
Interested in participating?
Request Info16 year–99 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
VU Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Psychological problems are prevalent among university students and are associated with lower mental wellbeing and resilience. Universities provide an excellent environment for students to enhance mental wellbeing, resilience, and acquire life skills.
Caring Universities (CU) is an internationally embedded consortium of nine Dutch universities aimed at improving students' mental wellbeing. The CU project consists of two components: 1) an annual online questionnaire assessing students' mental health; and 2) a platform offering free, guided eHealth interventions to enhance mental well-being.
One of the interventions on the CU platform - called LifeHack - seeks to enhance mental wellbeing by increasing resilience, teaching life skills, and strengthening mental wellbeing. LifeHack is a guided eHealth intervention based on cognitive behavioural therapy, comprising 13 modules of approximately 30 minutes each focusing on four themes (mood management, productivity, self-worth, and relationships). We investigated the effects of LifeHack with pre-post measurements (total n = 216 at post-test) and found that after following LifeHack, mental wellbeing improved with small to moderate effect sizes. Additionally, students reported satisfaction with the programme and the eCoach. However, participants indicated lack of motivation and early symptom reduction as important reasons for drop-out. Furthermore, the diverse topics covered in LifeHack may not be relevant to all students, leading to more dropouts.
Currently, there are two versions of LifeHack: one 'structured', where modules must be completed in order, and one 'free choice', where all modules are available from the start and none are mandatory. For the proposed study, the free choice version of LifeHack will be used and adapted in co-creation with students as follows: participants will be asked which topics they find most important and want to work on. Based on their answers, a personalized selection of modules will be presented, and students can choose which module to start with. Each module is standalone, allowing students to proceed to another module or stop after completing one or more. Each module has a clear structure, beginning with goal formulation and concluding with an action plan. The new adapted version of LifeHack will be personalized and tailored for each student, aiming to improve motivation and reduce dropout rates.
With the current study, we aim to examine the effectiveness of the adapted version of LifeHack in an RCT to enhance mental wellbeing in university students. Secondary objectives include investigating differences between the intervention and control groups on students' self-report questionnaire resilience scores, depression scores, anxiety scores, stress-related scores, and mental health quality of life scores (pretest vs post-test). Additional outcomes include satisfaction with the programme and the eCoach, as well as adherence to the intervention.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
See arm description
Time frame: T0 (baseline), T1 (4 weeks post-baseline active group), T2 (4 weeks post-baseline wait list group), T3 (4 weeks post-T2 wait list group), T4 (6 months post-baseline both groups)
Mental Health Continuum-Short Form, MHC-SF (Lamers et al., 2011).
Time frame: T0 (baseline), T1 (4 weeks post-baseline active group), T2 (4 weeks post-baseline wait list group), T3 (4 weeks post-T2 wait list group), T4 (6 months post-baseline both groups)
Brief Resilience Scale (Smith et al., 2008).
Time frame: T0 (baseline), T1 (4 weeks post-baseline active group), T2 (4 weeks post-baseline wait list group), T3 (4 weeks post-T2 wait list group), T4 (6 months post-baseline both groups)
Patient Health Questionnaire - 9, PHQ-9 (Kroenke et al., 2001).
Time frame: T0 (baseline), T1 (4 weeks post-baseline active group), T2 (4 weeks post-baseline wait list group), T3 (4 weeks post-T2 wait list group), T4 (6 months post-baseline both groups)
Perceived Stress Scale-10, PSS-10 (Cohen, 1988).
Time frame: T0 (baseline), T1 (4 weeks post-baseline active group), T2 (4 weeks post-baseline wait list group), T3 (4 weeks post-T2 wait list group), T4 (6 months post-baseline both groups)
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale, GAD-7 (Spitzer et al., 2006).
Time frame: T0 (baseline), T1 (4 weeks post-baseline active group), T2 (4 weeks post-baseline wait list group), T3 (4 weeks post-T2 wait list group), T4 (6 months post-baseline both groups)
Mental Health Quality of Life questionnaire, MHQoL (Krugten et al., 2022).
Time frame: T0 (baseline)
E.g. gender, age, nationality
Time frame: After each module (approximately once per week)
Patient Health Questionnaire - 4 (Kroenke et al., 2009). After each module, the PHQ-4 will be assessed in both groups.
Time frame: 4 weeks post-baseline active group and 4 weeks post-T2 wait list group.
The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire, CSQ-8 (Larsen et al., 1979)
Time frame: 4 weeks post-baseline active group and 4 weeks post-T2 wait list group.
We will also ask participants to evaluate the e-coach at the post-test. The questions about e-coach evaluation will be based on the Working Alliance Inventory for Guided Internet Interventions (WAI-I) (Gómez Penedo et al., 2020)
Time frame: T1 (4 weeks post-baseline active group), T2 (4 weeks post-baseline wait list group), T3 (4 weeks post-T2 wait list group), T4 (6 months post-baseline both groups)
Adherence will be measured by the total number of completed sessions, time spent on the platform, and the number of logins.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Universiteit Leiden
Other
LifeHack: RCT Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Guided E-health Programme in Improving Mental Wellbeing in University Students.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06928467
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07030244
Adherence, Behavior
Amsterdam, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT06020274
Anxiety Disorders, Behavior
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06012084
Anxiety Disorders, Behavior
Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
View Trial Details