Rapamycin cream
DrugApplication of rapamycin cream to port wine birthmark
NCT Number: NCT07436611
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the use of rapamycin cream can be used as a treatment together with pulsed dyed laser in treating port wine stain birthmarks. The main question it aims to answer is:
Will rapamycin cream and laser treatment show a greater improvement in appearance of port wine birthmarks, compared to treatment with placebo cream and laser?
Researchers will compare two concentrations of rapamycin cream (0.6% or 1.0%) with placebo treatment to see if appearance is improved following 12 weeks of treatment.
Participants will receive laser treatment of their port wine birthmark and then apply the rapamycin or placebo cream daily for 12 weeks. Patients will visit the clinic every 4 weeks for checkups and tests.
Trial opening soon.
Get NotifiedUp to 10 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Sant Joan de Déu University Hospital, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
This is a single-centre, double-blind, randomized withdrawal design, parallel group, placebo-controlled, dose-response clinical study investigating the efficacy and safety of two concentrations of topical rapamycin cream in the treatment of port wine stain as an adjunct to pulsed dyed laser (PDL) in paediatric patients. 30 participants will be enrolled into the study.
The study hypothesis is that topical rapamycin, as an adjunct to PDL, will show a dose-dependent increase in the blanching of port wine birthmarks, compared to PDL with placebo after 12 weeks.
Eligible participants will undergo PDL treatment of their entire port wine birthmark. Patients that respond positively to PDL within 5 days will be enrolled and randomized, before the first application of the study drug. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three possible treatments in a 1:1:1 ratio:
During this phase of the study, four clinical visits will occur, one every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. Assessment of the extent and severity of birthmark size and colour will be performed at randomization, at each clinical visit, and at follow-up using photography and percentage improvement ratings. Safety will be assessed by recording all adverse events experienced and testing blood rapamycin concentration at prior to treatment and at the last clinical visit.
Follow-up will be performed 28 days after the last cream application. An extra PDL session will be optionally provided at the follow-up appointment. If PDL treatment occurs at the follow-up visit, a further follow-up phone call will occur 7±2 days after the second PDL session to assess concomitant medications and adverse events.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Application of rapamycin cream to port wine birthmark
Pulsed dyed laser (PDL) treatment of port wine birthmark
Time frame: From before laser treatment to the end of treatment after 12 weeks of cream application
The average percentage improvement (0-100% with higher scores being a better outcome) of port wine stain appearance in the cream treated area from baseline to week 12, or at last visit if early withdrawal/discontinuation occurs, as assessed by the principal investigator during the clinic visit.
Time frame: From before laser treatment to the end of treatment after 12 weeks of cream application
Subjective (patient or parent/caregiver) improvement rating (0-100% with higher scores being a better outcome) of port wine stain from baseline after 0, 4, 8 and 12 weeks of treatment.
Time frame: From before laser treatment to the end of treatment after 12 weeks of cream application
Clinic Objective (investigator) improvement rating (0-100% with higher scores being a better outcome) in port wine stain from baseline after 0, 4, 8 and 12 weeks of treatment
Time frame: From before laser treatment to the end of treatment after 12 weeks of cream application
Photographic Objective improvement rating (0-100% with higher scores being a better outcome), assessed by a committee of three dermatologists, in port wine stain from baseline after 0, 4, 8 and 12 weeks of treatment
Time frame: From before laser treatment to follow-up visit (16 weeks)
Subjective (patient or parent/caregiver) improvement rating (0-100% with higher scores being a better outcome) change of cream treated area from baseline at follow-up visit
Time frame: 4 weeks between end of treatment and follow-up visit
Subjective (patient or parent/caregiver) improvement rating (0-100% with higher scores being a better outcome) change of cream treated area between week 12 and follow-up
Time frame: From before laser treatment to follow-up visit (16 weeks)
Clinic Objective (investigator) improvement rating (0-100% with higher scores being a better outcome) change of cream treated area from baseline at follow-up visit
Time frame: 4 weeks between end of treatment and follow-up visit
Clinic Objective (investigator) improvement rating (0-100% with higher scores being a better outcome) change of cream treated area between week 12 and follow-up
Time frame: From before laser treatment to follow-up visit (16 weeks)
Photographic Objective improvement rating (0-100% with higher scores being a better outcome), assessed by a committee of three dermatologists, change of cream treated area from baseline at follow-up visit
Time frame: 4 weeks between end of treatment and follow-up visit
Photographic Objective improvement rating (0-100% with higher scores being a better outcome), assessed by a committee of three dermatologists, change of cream treated area between week 12 and follow-up
Time frame: From before laser treatment to the end of treatment after 12 weeks of cream application
Categorical Improvement (5-point scale with higher scores being a better outcome) of port wine stain in cream treated area from baseline after 12 weeks of treatment.
Time frame: From before laser treatment to the follow-up visit (16 weeks)
Change in extent and intensity of port wine stain colour of the cream treated area from baseline at weeks 0, 4, 8, 12 and follow-up/last assessment, measured using a colorimetry system through standardized clinical photographs
Time frame: From before laser treatment to the follow-up visit (16 weeks)
Difference in extent and intensity of port wine stain colour between the two treatment areas (laser+cream or laser only) of each individual at each assessment (pre-laser baseline, weeks 0, 4, 8, 12 and follow-up/last assessment) using the colorimetry system
Time frame: From start of cream treatment to the follow-up visit (16 weeks)
Difference in subjective (patient or parent/caregiver) improvement rating (0-100% with higher scores being a better outcome) of port wine stain between the treatment areas (laser+cream or laser only) of each individual at each assessment (week 0, 4, 8, 12 and follow-up/last assessment)
Time frame: From start of cream treatment to the follow-up visit (16 weeks)
Difference in clinic objective (investigator) improvement rating (0-100% with higher scores being a better outcome) of port wine stain between the treatment areas (laser+cream or laser only) of each individual at each assessment (week 0, 4, 8, 12 and follow-up/last assessment)
Time frame: From start of cream treatment to the follow-up visit (16 weeks)
Difference in photographic objective (committee) improvement rating (0-100% with higher scores being a better outcome) of port wine stain between the treatment areas (laser+cream or laser only) of each individual at each assessment (week 0, 4, 8, 12 and follow-up/last assessment)
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
AFT Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.
Industry
Rapamycin Dose-Ranging Efficacy Study: A Phase II, Proof of Concept, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized, Parallel-group, Dose-response Comparison of the Effects of Different Strengths of Rapamycin Cream Applied Topically in Subjects Diagnosed With Port Wine Stains
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07183644
Congenital Abnormalities, Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
Dallas, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07353385
Hemangioma, Hemangioma, Capillary
Xi’an, Shanxi, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07128459
Hemangioma, Hemangioma, Capillary
Shanghai, China
View Trial DetailsNCT00556946
Cardiovascular Abnormalities, Cardiovascular Diseases
Irvine, California, United States
View Trial Details