Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01976312

Ranibizumab Intravitreal Injections Versus Sham Control in Patients With Central Retinal Vein Occlusion (CRVO)

Provide efficacy and safety data on intravitreal injections of ranibizumab 0.5 mg in patients with visual impairment due to macular edema secondary to CRVO

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Novartis Investigative Site, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

for study and fellow eye:

  • Patients with visual impairment secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) with a BCVA between 24 and 73 letters in one eye and at least 35 letters in the other eye.

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnant or nursing women or women of child bearing potential unless using an effective contraception
  • Stroke or myocard infarction within 3 months prior to study
  • History of malignancy within the past 5 years
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Active infection or inflammation in any eye
  • use of corticosteroids for at least 30 days in the last 6 months
  • treatment with anti-angiogenic drugs in any eye within last 3 months
  • Panretinal or focal/drid laser photocoagulation within the last 3 and 4 months respectively

Treatment and study plan

Sham Injection

Other

Sham injections referred to the imitation of an intravitreal injection using an injection syringe without needle.

Ranibizumab 0.5 mg

Drug

Ranibizumab solution for injection was supplied in vials. Each vial contained ranibizumab concentration of 10mg/mL labeled as 0.5 mg/0.5 mL, corresponding to a 0.5 mg dose level. Ranibizumab was formulated as a sterile solution aseptically filled in a sterile glass vial for single use only

Other names: Lucentis

Primary outcomes

  1. Average Change in Visual Acuity (Letters) From Baseline to Month 1 Through Month 3

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months

    Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was assessed in a sitting position using ETDRS-like visual acuity testing charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters.

    Mean Visual Acuity was averaged over all monthly assessments from month 1 to month 3 and compared to Baseline.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Average Change of Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline to Month 1 Through Month 12

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 months

    Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was assessed in a sitting position using ETDRS-like visual acuity testing charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters. Mean Visual Acuity was averaged over all monthly assessments from month 1 to month 12 and compared to Baseline

  2. Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Change From Baseline Over Time

    Time frame: Month 1 to 12 months

    Visual acuity (VA) was assessed on both eyes during every study visit using best correction determined from protocol refraction. VA measurements (number of letters correctly identified) were performed with the patient in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity testing charts at a testing distance of 4 meters. This outcome measure describes the change in visual acuity at each visit compared to baseline

  3. Change From Baseline in Central-Sub-Field- Thickness (CSFT) Over Time

    Time frame: Month 1 to month 12

    OCT (optical coherence tomography) was used to assess CSFT (Central Sub-Field Thickness) representing the average retinal thickness of the circular area within 1 mm diameter around the foveal center.

  4. Number of Participants With a Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Improvement of ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters Over Time

    Time frame: Month 1 to month 12

    Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was assessed in a sitting position using ETDRS-like visual acuity testing charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters.

  5. Number of Participants With Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)Loss of <15 Letters in the Study Eye Over Time

    Time frame: Month 1 to 12 months

    Visual acuity (VA) was assessed at every study visit using best correction determined from protocol refraction. VA measurements (number of letters correctly identified) were performed with the patient in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity testing charts at a testing distance of 4 meters. This outcome measure describes for each post-baseline month whether or not a patient lost less than 15 letters of VA as compared with baseline.

  6. The Change in Patient Reported Outcomes in NEI-VFQ-25 Score (Composite Score and Subscales) at Month 3, 6 and 12 Compared to Baseline

    Time frame: Month 3,6 and 12

    The VFQ-25 consists of 25 vision related questions across 11 vision related subscales, including general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, social function, mental health, role difficulties, dependency, driving, color vision and peripheral vision, and a general health rating. Items are converted to a 0-100 scale on each subscale and for the composite score where higher scores represents better functioning.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Double-masked, Phase III Study Assessing Ranibizumab Intravitreal Injections Versus Sham Control in Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Macular Edema (ME) Secondary to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion (CRVO) [Camellia]

Acronym: Camellia

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Nov 5, 2013
Registry last updated
May 30, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.