Hopital privé Dijon Bourgogne
Dijon, 21000, France
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07245823
Vulvovaginal incompetence is generally associated with prolapse and contributes to the pathogenesis of the latter. The perineum and the perineal body (PB) are structures frequently injured throughout life, leading to vesicourethral and rectoanal dysfunction, which are the main focus of study. Other symptoms, such as periorificial dyspareunia and vulvovaginal incompetence, appear to be less verbalized by women. The resulting sexual discomfort is linked, on the one hand, to physical anatomical trauma, with, in some cases, vulvovaginal incompetence contributing to a vaginal sensitivity decreased, and, on the other hand, to psychological trauma with damage to self-image. Vulvoperineoplasty is a surgical repair procedure that aims to optimally reconstruct the introital anatomy by correcting the vulvovaginal incompetence in order to restore normal anatomy, restore self-image, and treat the symptoms of vaginal laxity (feeling of a vagina that is too large and loss of vaginal sensitivity).
Conventional surgical techniques for treating vulvar incompetence, such as levator myorrhaphy and perineorrhaphy, are currently being questioned because they cause functional sequelae, particularly regarding to sexual quality of life. The pubo-rectal muscle plication (PPR) technique is based on the anatomical observation of puborectalis muscle lengthening (PMR) observed on MRI scans in patients with vaginal incompetence. This technique could be an interesting alternative in the surgical treatment of vulvovaginal incompetence.
The main objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of anatomical reconstruction of vulvovaginal incompetence by sagittal plication of the puborectalis muscles vs. by perineorrhaphy ± transverse myorrhaphy of the puborectalis muscles at 12 months.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–80 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Dijon, 21000, France
Location status: Recruiting
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Anatomical reconstruction of the vulvovaginal gape with two different surgeries
Questionnaires of quality of sexual life (PPSSQ), of anal incontinence and constipation
MRI of the genital hiatus
Time frame: 12 months
The effectiveness of anatomical reconstruction of the vulvovaginal gap will be assessed at 12 months using a composite criterion. The reconstruction will be considered successful if the following three criteria are met:
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Jean-François Oudet, M.
CONTACT
Marie-Hélène Barba
CONTACT
GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche
Other
Randomized Study Evaluating the Treatment of Vulvovaginal Gaping by Plication of the Puborectalis Muscles Versus Perineorrhaphy ± Transverse Myorrhaphy of the Puborectalis Muscles at 12 Months.
Acronym: HERA
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06430931
Colorectal Disorders, Cystocele
Amersfoort, Utrecht, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT06404931
Pathological Conditions, Anatomical, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Terrassa, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT07612202
Postoperative Care, Prolapse Genital
Hillerød, Copenhagen, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT07194343
Pathological Conditions, Anatomical, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Barcelona, Spain
View Trial Details