Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07194343

Posterior Mesh Fixation at the Levator Ani Level in Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse

This is a prospective, randomized, multicenter, non-inferiority trial including women with stage II-IV apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP), classified according to the POP-Q system. Participants will be randomized into two groups:

Group A: laparoscopic colposacropexy with posterior mesh fixation to the levator ani muscle.

Group B: laparoscopic colposacropexy with posterior mesh fixation to the vaginal cuff/cervix, without dissection of the rectovaginal space.

The objective of the study is to determine whether a simplified colposacropexy technique is non-inferior to the standard procedure in terms of anatomical and functional outcomes.

The primary outcome is anatomical success, defined as a postoperative POP-Q stage 0-I. Secondary outcomes include functional status and sexual function, evaluated using the PFDI-20 and PISQ-12 questionnaires. Data on prolapse anatomy, related symptoms, and sexual function will be collected at baseline and during follow-up visits at 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery.

This study is supported by a national health research grant from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Ministry of Science and Innovation, Spain.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Hospital Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This study is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, evaluator-blinded, non-inferiority clinical trial. The null hypothesis is that colposacropexy with posterior mesh fixation to the vaginal vault (without rectovaginal dissection) is associated with an anatomical and/or functional failure rate that is equal to or more than 15% higher than colposacropexy with posterior mesh fixation to the levator ani muscle (deep rectovaginal dissection). A non-inferiority margin of 15% has been selected because smaller differences are not considered clinically relevant.

With this project, the investigators aim to evaluate the outcomes of a simplified colposacropexy technique that avoids dissection of the rectovaginal space and deep pelvic mesh fixation. Demonstrating non-inferiority would imply rejecting the null hypothesis.

The procedure is indicated for women with stage II-IV uterine or vault prolapse according to the POP-Q classification, with or without associated anterior and/or posterior vaginal wall defects. The decision to perform surgery will be made by the gynecologists, independent of trial participation, to ensure that study enrollment does not influence standard surgical indications. Exclusion criteria include previous abdominal or vaginal mesh prolapse reconstructive surgery or POP-Q stage I or asymptomatic prolapse.

Sample size calculations assume a 91% success rate for the standardized procedure (Lee 2014), a non-inferiority margin of 15%, a 95% confidence interval, and 80% statistical power. A total of 166 patients (83 per group) are required, accounting for a 10% dropout rate.

DESCRIPTION OF THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

The vesicovaginal dissection and exposure of the sacral promontory will be performed identically in both groups. A predesigned polypropylene mesh will be used, consisting of:

  • an apical end for fixation to the sacral promontory,
  • two lateral arms shaped like "butterfly wings" to cover and support the anterior and lateral vaginal walls,
  • and two lower arms designed for fixation to the levator ani muscle.

Fixation of the mesh to the vagina, sacral promontory, and (when applicable) the levator ani muscle will be performed using nitinol helical mechanical sutures (Spire'it). At the vesicovaginal space, the mesh will be anchored at the anatomical depth corresponding to the vesical neck level in both groups.

The only difference between groups involves the posterior compartment dissection and mesh fixation:

  • Group A (standard technique): the posterior arms of the mesh are anchored bilaterally to the levator ani muscle with mechanical sutures.
  • Group B (simplified technique): the posterior arms are removed, and the mesh is anchored only to the vaginal vault or cervix with mechanical sutures, without rectovaginal dissection.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women with primary or recurrent apical prolapse (uterine or vaginal vault) stage II-IV according to the POP-Q classification.
  • Women with symptomatic POP with indication of reconstructive POP surgery.
  • Agreement to comply with all scheduled visits and assessments through 12 months post-surgery.
  • Understand and accept the study procedures and sign the informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • History of abdominal reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
  • History of vaginal reconstructive surgery for prolapse using mesh.
  • Stage I prolapse according to the POP-Q classification, or asymptomatic prolapse.
  • Medical contraindication to general anesthesia.
  • Patient preference for vaginal surgical treatment.
  • Declines participation in the study.
  • Patients with disabilities or unable to understand the terms of the study.

Treatment and study plan

Laparoscopic colposacropexy with levator ani muscle mesh fixation

Procedure

The standard technique includes dissection of the rectovaginal space and bilateral mesh fixation to the levator ani muscle at the deep limit of the pararectal fossae dissection.

Simplified modification of laparoscopic colposacropexy

Procedure

Rectovaginal dissection is avoided, and the mesh is anchored to the posterior aspect of the cervix or vaginal vault rather than to the levator ani muscle, representing the specific modification from the standard technique.

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in anatomical success rate between simplified (Group B) and standard (Group A) laparoscopic colposacropexy.

    Time frame: 12 months after surgery

    Proportion of participants achieving anatomical success, defined as postoperative POP-Q stage 0-I. The primary analysis will test non-inferiority of the simplified technique (Group B) versus the standard technique (Group A). Non-inferiority will be concluded if the lower bound of the two-sided 95% confidence interval for (Success_B - Success_A) is greater than 15% (non-inferiority margin = 15%). POP-Q assessment will be performed using standardized technique by an evaluator blinded to surgical assignment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference in functional outcomes between simplified (Group B) and standard (Group A) laparoscopic colposacropexy.

    Time frame: 12 months after surgery

    Functional outcomes will be assessed by validated questionnaire: Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20). Scores will be compared between groups to evaluate whether the simplified technique results in inferior functional outcomes compared with the standard technique in women with stage II-IV apical prolapse.

    PFDI-20 consists of 20 items divided into three subdomains:

    • Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (POPDI-6): Score range: 0 to 24.
    • Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory (CRADI-8): Score range: 0 to 32.
    • Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI-6): Score range: 0 to 24. Each item is scored from 0 (no distress) to 4 (quite a bit of distress). Subdomain scores are calculated by summing the responses within each section. The total PFDI-20 score is the sum of all three subdomains, with a possible global score ranging from 0 to 80. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity and higher levels of distress caused by pelvic floor disorders.
  2. Difference in sexual outcomes between simplified (Group B) and standard (Group A) laparoscopic colposacropexy.

    Time frame: 12 months after surgery

    Sexual outcomes will be assessed by validated questionnaire: Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-12 (PISQ-12). Scores will be compared between groups to evaluate whether the simplified technique results in inferior sexual outcomes compared with the standard technique in women with stage II-IV apical prolapse.

    The PISQ-12 is a validated, condition-specific questionnaire used to assess sexual function in women with pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. It consists of 12 items covering three domains:

    • Behavioral-Emotional Domain
    • Physical Domain
    • Partner-Related Domain Each item is scored on a scale from 0 to 4 and the total PISQ-12 score ranges from 0 to 48. A higher total score reflects better sexual function and quality of sexual life, while lower scores indicate greater sexual dysfunction related to pelvic floor disorders.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

Other

Collaborators

  • Carlos III Health Institute
  • Ministry of Science and Innovation, Spain

Registry information

Official study title

Multicenter Study on Levator Ani Muscle Fixation in Laparoscopic Colposacropexy (FIMEA Multicenter Study)

Acronym: FIMEA

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Sep 26, 2025
Registry last updated
Feb 10, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.