Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
Seattle, Washington, 98109, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Jacob Appelbaum, MD, PhD
CONTACT
Jacob Appelbaum, MD, PhD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT07094750
This clinical trial studies whether less fit adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myeloid neoplasms are willing to let a computer program decide (randomization) whether they receive lower- or higher-intensity chemotherapy. Historically, treatment decision-making for patients with AML or myeloid neoplasms has divided patients into two categories, with patients considered fit receiving intensive "curative" chemotherapy, and patients considered unfit, such as older patients with a higher risk of early death from therapy, receiving non-intensive "palliative" therapy or no therapy. With the introduction of new treatment agents, it has become difficult to determine the difference between intensive and non-intensive therapy, especially for patients considered unfit for whom treatment-related side effects remain a concern. Treatment intensity is best identified through randomized trials but often patients are unwilling to undergo randomization due to preset beliefs. However, with improved supportive care and the awareness that new treatment agents may have similar risks as intensive therapy, it may be possible that more patients are willing to be randomized. This may help identify the best treatment intensity for less fit adults with AML or myeloid neoplasms, which may improve outcomes.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Seattle, Washington, 98109, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Jacob Appelbaum, MD, PhD
CONTACT
Jacob Appelbaum, MD, PhD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
OUTLINE:
This pilot umbrella trial will explore the feasibility of randomizing patients to higher or lower intensity treatment regimens.
The exact treatment regimens given will be at the discretion of the treating physician and will be provided either as standard of care or following enrollment on a subsequent treatment trial.
Patients and physicians indicate willingness to randomize, those willing are randomized to 1 of 2 arms, those unwilling choose arm III or IV.
ARM I: Patients receive standard of care (SOC) or investigational higher-intensity therapy on a subsequent treatment trial that is at least as intense as seven days of cytarabine in combination with three days of anthracycline (7+3 regimen) at the discretion of the treating physician on study. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
ARM II: Patients receive SOC or investigational lower-intensity therapy on a subsequent treatment trial that is less intense than five days of cytarabine in combination with two days of anthracycline (5+2 regimen) at the discretion of the treating physician on study. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
ARM III: Patients receive SOC or investigational higher-intensity therapy on a subsequent treatment trial that is at least as intense as 7+3 regimen according to physician/patient preference on study. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
ARM IV: Patients receive SOC or investigational lower-intensity therapy on a subsequent treatment trial that is less intense than 5+2 regimen according to physician/patient preference on study. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Additionally, all patients undergo bone marrow assessments or blood sample collection on study, with additional assessments or collections as clinically indicated.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up periodically for up to 24 months.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Undergo blood sample collection
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Specimen Collection
Undergo bone marrow assessment
Other names: Collection, Bone Marrow
Ancillary studies
Ancillary studies
Time frame: At baseline
Patient willingness to randomize will be indicated on the survey instrument Patient Preference for Treatment Assignment Survey. Patients who select the box indicating "I am willing to let a coin flip (i.e. computer program) decide whether I receive lower- or higher-intensity chemotherapy" will be considered willing to randomize. Will consider randomization feasible (i.e. a subsequent, larger study would be designed as a randomized trial) if the true proportion of patients willing to be randomized is 60% or higher.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
Other
Impact of Treatment Intensity on Survival, Quality of Life, and Resource Utilization in Medically Less Fit Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or High-Grade Myeloid Neoplasms: A Randomized Pilot Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03012672
Acute Leukemia of Ambiguous Lineage, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06013423
Acute Leukemia of Ambiguous Lineage, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07046078
Acute Leukemia of Ambiguous Lineage, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04065399
Acute Leukemia of Ambiguous Lineage, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial Details