Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
Seattle, Washington, 98109, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Filippo Milano, MD, PhD
CONTACT
Filippo Milano, MD, PhD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT07046078
This phase II trial tests the safety, side effects, and how well combination chemotherapy with fludarabine, high-dose cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), and idarubicin (FLAG-Ida) followed immediately by reduced-intensity total body radiation therapy, called total body irradiation (TBI), and donor hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) works in treating adults age 60 and older with newly diagnosed adverse-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or other high-grade myeloid cancer. Despite advances in supportive care and the approval of more than 10 new drugs since 2017, the outcomes of older adults with adverse-risk acute myeloid leukemia and other high-grade myeloid cancers remains poor. Most patients are expected to die from their cancer or the consequences of treatment-related side effects. Donor HCT is a very important part of any curative-cancer treatment for these patients. However, while accepted as standard care for decades, this treatment exposes patients to long periods of drug-induced low blood cell counts and the problems associated with low blood counts, like infections and bleeding, which are associated with significant risk of chronic side effects and death. This study will use a different approach to the upfront curative-cancer treatment of older adults with an adverse-risk AML or other high-grade myeloid cancer. This study will use intense chemotherapy followed a few days later by lower-dose TBI and donor HCT. Chemotherapy drugs, such as idarubicin, fludarabine, high-dose cytarabine work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. G-CSF helps the bone marrow make more white blood cells in patients with low white blood cell count due to cancer treatment. This approach allows effective treatment of cancer cells and overall reduction of the period of low blood cells counts. This decreases the risk for problems associated with low blood counts, such as infection and chronic side effects. Decreasing these are important for older adults who undergo HCT. This treatment strategy may improve treatment outcomes by allowing more patients to successfully undergo donor HCT and reduce the risk of low blood cell counts and the problems associated with low blood counts. Giving chemotherapy followed immediately by reduced-intensity TBI and donor HCT may be safe, tolerable and/or effective in treating adults age 60 and older with newly diagnosed adverse-risk AML or other high-grade myeloid cancer.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Seattle, Washington, 98109, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Filippo Milano, MD, PhD
CONTACT
Filippo Milano, MD, PhD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
OUTLINE:
Patients receive granulocyte colony-stimulating factor subcutaneously (SC) once daily (QD) on days -9 to -4 or days -7 to -4 as clinically indicated, fludarabine intravenously (IV) over 30 minutes QD on days -8 to -4, cytarabine IV over 2 hours QD on days -8 to -4, and idarubicin IV over 60 minutes QD on days -8 to -6. Patients undergo TBI QD on days -1 and 0 or twice daily (BID) on day -1 or 0. Patients then undergo allogeneic HCT with unmodified peripheral blood stem cells IV on day 0 or 1 day after TBI as clinically indicated. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Additionally, patients undergo multigated acquisition scan (MUGA) or echocardiography (ECHO) during screening and as clinically indicated, undergo bone marrow biopsy and/or aspiration throughout the study and blood sample collection during follow up.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at days 28, 56 and 80, at months 3 and 6 and at years 1 and 2.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Undergo allogeneic HCT
Other names: Allogeneic, Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation, HSC, HSCT, Stem Cell Transplantation, Allogeneic
Undergo blood sample collection
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Specimen Collection
Undergo bone marrow biopsy and/or aspiration
Undergo bone marrow biopsy and/or aspiration
Other names: Biopsy of Bone Marrow, Biopsy, Bone Marrow
Given IV
Other names: .beta.-Cytosine arabinoside, 1-.beta.-D-Arabinofuranosyl-4-amino-2(1H)pyrimidinone, 1-.beta.-D-Arabinofuranosylcytosine, 1-Beta-D-arabinofuranosyl-4-amino-2(1H)pyrimidinone, 1-Beta-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine, 1.beta.-D-Arabinofuranosylcytosine, 2(1H)-Pyrimidinone, 4-Amino-1-beta-D-arabinofuranosyl-, 2(1H)-Pyrimidinone, 4-amino-1.beta.-D-arabinofuranosyl-, Alexan, Ara-C, ARA-cell, Arabine, Arabinofuranosylcytosine, Arabinosylcytosine, Aracytidine, Aracytin, Aracytine, Beta-Cytosine Arabinoside, CHX-3311, Cytarabinum, Cytarbel, Cytosar, Cytosine Arabinoside, Cytosine-.beta.-arabinoside, Cytosine-beta-arabinoside, Erpalfa, Starasid, Tarabine PFS, U 19920, U-19920, Udicil, WR-28453
Undergo ECHO
Other names: EC, Echocardiography
Given IV
Other names: Fluradosa
Given IV
Other names: 4-Demethoxydaunomycin, 4-Demethoxydaunorubicin, 4-DMDR
Undergo MUGA
Other names: Blood Pool Scan, Equilibrium Radionuclide Angiography, Gated Blood Pool Imaging, Gated Heart Pool Scan, MUGA, MUGA Scan, Multi-Gated Acquisition Scan, Radionuclide Ventriculogram Scan, Radionuclide Ventriculography, RNV Scan, RNVG, SYMA Scanning, Synchronized Multigated Acquisition Scanning
Given IV
Other names: PBSC, Peripheral Blood Stem Cells, peripheral stem cell, Peripheral Stem Cells
Ancillary studies
Given SC
Other names: Recombinant Colony-Stimulating Factor 3, rhG-CSF
Undergo TBI
Other names: SCT_TBI, TBI, Total Body Irradiation, Whole Body, Whole Body Irradiation, Whole-Body Irradiation
Time frame: Up to 42 days after informed consent
Will evaluate the proportion of participants starting study treatment with FLAG-Ida within 42 days of the date of informed consent.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Will evaluate the number of patients transplanted.
Time frame: From day of consent to day of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT)
Will evaluate time from day of consent to day of allogeneic HCT.
Time frame: Up to 2 years following Screening enrollment
Identified reasons for failure to undergo allogeneic transplantation (e.g., lack of suitable donor, complications of disease) will be systematically categorized and quantitatively reported.
Time frame: From start of conditioning (Day -9) to study-defined neutrophil engraftment, or adversely, to graft failure
Will evaluate the number of participants with non-hematologic adverse events ≥ grade 3. Will use the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 for toxicity and adverse event reporting.
Time frame: Day 0 to study-defined neutrophil engraftment, or adversely, to graft failure.
Will evaluate the time to neutrophil count recovery. The day of neutrophil recovery will be the 1st day of 2 consecutive days of absolute neutrophil count at or above 500/µL.
Time frame: Day 0 to study-defined platelet engraftment
Will evaluate the time to platelet count recovery. Platelet engraftment will be defined as the first of 7 days of a platelet count > 20,000/µl without subsequent transfusions for 7 days.
Time frame: From start of conditioning (Day -9) to study-defined neutrophil engraftment, or adversely, to graft failure
Will evaluate the number of participants with any severe adverse event. Will use the NCI CTCAE version 5.0 for toxicity and adverse event reporting.
Time frame: Up to day 100 after HCT
Will evaluate the number of participants experiencing NRM by day +100 after HCT.
Time frame: At day 80 (+/- 7 days)
Will evaluate the rate of peripheral blood CD3 chimerism at day 80 (±7 days). Mixed or full donor chimerism will be evidence of donor engraftment.
Full chimerism: > 95% donor CD3+ T cells. Mixed chimerism: the detection of peripheral blood donor T cells (CD3+) and granulocytes (CD33+) as a proportion of the total peripheral blood T cell and granulocyte population, respectively.
Time frame: At day 80 (+/- 7 days)
Will evaluate the rate of peripheral blood CD33 chimerism at day 80 (±7 days). Mixed or full donor chimerism will be evidence of donor engraftment. Full chimerism: > 95% donor CD3+ T cells. Mixed chimerism: the detection of peripheral blood donor T cells (CD3+) and granulocytes (CD33+) as a proportion of the total peripheral blood T cell and granulocyte population, respectively.
Time frame: Up to day 100
Will evaluate the cumulative incidence of grade 2-4 acute GVHD by day +100.
Time frame: Up to day 365
Will evaluate the cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD requiring systemic immunosuppressive therapy by day +365.
Time frame: Up to day 42
Will evaluate the number of participants achieving complete remission or complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery by day +42. Will be determined by peripheral blood count and bone marrow evaluation and categorized according to the 2022 European LeukemiaNet criteria.
Time frame: Up to day 42
Will evaluate the number of participants achieving MRD-negativity by day +42. Will be determined by peripheral blood count and bone marrow evaluation and categorized according to the 2022 European LeukemiaNet criteria.
Time frame: At day 180
Will evaluate relapse-free survival at day +180. Will be determined by peripheral blood count and bone marrow evaluation and categorized according to the 2022 European LeukemiaNet criteria.
Time frame: At day 180
Will evaluate overall survival at day +180.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
Other
Pilot Study of FLAG-Ida Followed Immediately by Reduced-Intensity Allogeneic HCT for Adults Age 60 and Older With Newly Diagnosed Adverse-Risk AML or Other High-Grade Myeloid Neoplasm
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06355583
Acute Leukemia of Ambiguous Lineage, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia
Birmingham, England, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT06013423
Acute Leukemia of Ambiguous Lineage, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07094750
Acute Leukemia of Ambiguous Lineage, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04065399
Acute Leukemia of Ambiguous Lineage, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial Details