Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03127696

Randomised Placebo-controlled Study of FMT to Impact Body Weight and Glycemic Control in Obese Subjects With T2DM

Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) represents a clinically feasible way to restore the gut microbial ecology, and has proven to be a breakthrough for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Early results in human have shown that FMT from lean donor when transplanted into subjects with metabolic syndrome resulted in a significant improvement in insulin sensitivity and an increased in intestinal microbial diversity, including a distinct increase in butyrate-producing bacterial strains. The therapy is generally well tolerated and appeared safe. No clinical studies have assessed the efficacy of FMT in obese subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Shatin, 000000, Hong Kong

About this study

There is a worldwide epidemic of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus continues to rise at an alarming rate. Weight loss is associated with reductions in risk of morbidity and mortality from obesity. Conventional non-pharmacological interventions based on diet and exercise showed limited long-term success in producing sustained weight loss. Although obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus may be treated by medications or by bariatric surgery, these alternatives are limited by incomplete resolution of the diseases, high cost or potential surgical-related morbidity. Further research focusing on increasing effectiveness of interventions and new ways to achieve weight loss in these individuals are needed.

Recently, accumulating evidence supports a role of the enteric microbiota in the pathogenesis of obesity-related insulin resistance. Obesity is associated with changes in the composition of the intestinal microbiota, and the obese microbiome appears to be more efficient in harvesting energy from the diet. Colonization of germ-free mice with an 'obese microbiota' results in a significantly greater increase in total body fat than colonization with a 'lean microbiota', suggesting gut microbiota as an additional contributing factor to the pathophysiology of obesity. Obese and lean phenotypes can also be induced in germ-free mice by transfer of fecal microbiota from human donors. These data have led to the use of microbiota therapeutics as a potential treatment for metabolic syndrome and obesity.

Clinical trials are being conducted to evaluate its use for other conditions. Early results in human have shown that FMT from lean donor when transplanted into subjects with metabolic syndrome resulted in a significant improvement in insulin sensitivity and an increased in intestinal microbial diversity, including a distinct increase in butyrate-producing bacterial strains. The therapy is generally well tolerated and appeared safe. No clinical studies have assessed the efficacy of FMT in obese subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

No clinical studies have assessed the efficacy of FMT in obese subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

A subgroup of 30 subjects will be analyzed at week 24. The difference and proportion in microbiome in different arms, microbial factors, and trans-kingdom correlation of microbial engraftment will be correlated with clinical data in an unblinded manner.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-70; and
  • BMI >=28 kg/m2 and < 45 kg/m2; and
  • A diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes mellitus for >=3 months; and
  • Written informed consent obtained

Exclusion criteria

  • Current pregnancy
  • Use of any weight loss medications in the preceding 1 year
  • Known history or concomitant significant gastrointestinal disorders (including Inflammatory Bowel Disease, current colorectal cancer, current GI infection)
  • Known history or concomitant significant food allergies
  • Immunosuppressed subjects
  • Known history of severe organ failure (including decompensated cirrhosis), inflammatory bowel disease, kidney failure, epilepsy, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
  • Current active sepsis
  • Active malignant disease in recent 2 years
  • Known contraindications to oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (OGD)
  • Use of probiotic or antibiotics in recent 3 months

Treatment and study plan

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation

Procedure

FMT

Lifestyle Modification Program

Behavioral

Lifestyle

Sham

Procedure

Sham

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of subjects with at least 20% lean-associated microbiota in recipients after FMT compared with subjects receiving lifestyle intervention alone up to week 24

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    Proportion of subjects with at least 20% lean-associated microbiota in recipients after FMT compared with subjects receiving lifestyle intervention alone up to week 24.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in microbial composition (including bacteriome and virome), function and metabolite

    Time frame: 4, 16, 20, 24 week

    Changes in microbial composition (including bacteriome and virome), function and metabolite at weeks 4, 16, 20 and 24 compared with baseline

  2. Changes in microbiome of stool (including bacteriome and virome)

    Time frame: 4, 16, 24 week

    Changes in microbiome of stool (including bacteriome and virome) at weeks 4, 16 and 24 compared with baseline

  3. Difference in microbiome (including bacteriome and virome) compared between subjects in different treatment arm

    Time frame: 24 week and 52 week

    Compare the difference in microbiome among different treatment arms

  4. Proportion of microbiome (including bacteriome and virome) derived from recipient, donor or both in subjects who received FMT

    Time frame: weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and 52

    Proportion of microbiome (including bacteriome and virome) derived from recipient, donor or both in subjects who received FMT

  5. Difference in microbiome (including bacteriome and virome) compared between subjects who have weight loss and those do not have weight loss

    Time frame: weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and 52

    Difference in microbiome (including bacteriome and virome) compared between subjects who have weight loss and those do not have weight loss

  6. Microbial factors (including bacteriome and virome) that are associated with percentage of body weight loss

    Time frame: weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and 52

    Microbial factors (including bacteriome and virome) that are associated with percentage of body weight loss

  7. Trans-kingdom correlation of microbial engraftment

    Time frame: weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and 52

    Trans-kingdom correlation of microbial engraftment after FMT between bacteriome, and virome

  8. Proportion of subjects with serious adverse events compared between treatment arm, especially those related to FMT

    Time frame: weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and 52

    Proportion of subjects with serious adverse events compared between treatment arm, especially those related to FMT

  9. Explore changes in fungome microbiota

    Time frame: weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and 52

    Explore changes in fungome microbiota

  10. Proportion of subjects achieving at least 10% reduction in weight compared with baseline

    Time frame: 52 weeks

    Proportion of subjects achieving at least 10% reduction in weight at 52 weeks

  11. Proportion of subjects achieving at least 10% reduction in weight compared with baseline

    Time frame: 24 weeks

    Proportion of subjects achieving at least 10% reduction in weight at 24 weeks

  12. Changes in body weight to calculate body mass index (BMI) at weeks 24 and 52 compared with baseline

    Time frame: 24 week and 52 week

    Compare the change in weight to calculate the BMI among different treatment arms

  13. Changes in biochemical parameters

    Time frame: 24 week and 52 week

    Changes in liver biochemistry, fasting glucose, fasting lipids, fasting insulin, HbA1C at weeks 24 and 52 compared with baseline

  14. A 30% decrease in insulin resistance at weeks 24 compared with baseline

    Time frame: week 24

    A 30% decrease in insulin resistance at weeks 24 compared with baseline

  15. Changes in liver stiffness to assess improvement of other metabolic disease weeks 24 compared with baseline

    Time frame: week 24

    Changes in liver stiffness to assess improvement of other metabolic disease weeks 24 compared with baseline

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomised Placebo-controlled Study of Fecal Microbiota Transplant (FMT) to Impact Body Weight and Glycemic Control in Obese Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Apr 25, 2017
Registry last updated
Feb 15, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.