Oslo University Hospital, Aker
Oslo, 0586, Norway
NCT Number: NCT06412900
Kidney stone disease causes significant morbidity, and stones obstructing the ureter can have serious consequences. Imaging diagnostics with computed tomography (CT) are crucial for diagnosis, treatment selection, and follow-up. Segmentation of CT images can provide objective data on stone burden and signs of obstruction. Artificial intelligence (AI) can automate such segmentation but can also be used for the diagnosis of stone disease and obstruction.
In this project, the aim is to investigate if:
Manual segmentation of CT scans can provide more accurate information about kidney stone disease compared to conventional interpretation.
AI segmentation yields valid results compared to manual segmentation. AI can detect ureteral stones and obstruction or predict spontaneous passage.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Oslo, 0586, Norway
Background:
Goals and Objectives:
The project aims to contribute to personalized and improved treatment and follow-up of patients with kidney stones using radiomics and the development of an artificial intelligence tool for CT examination assessment. The objectives are to assess:
Method:
Cohort:
Patients are recruited to the study at Oslo University Hospital, Radiology Department, Section Aker, which performs approximately 1350 CT examinations for urinary tract stones in approximately 1000 patients each year. Approximately 500 patients with a new episode or newly occurring colic pain and clinical suspicion of kidney stones are expected to be included.
Clinical data (where available):
Image data:
Clinical radiology report:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: At time of CT examination (inclusion and follow up - expected average 12 weeks)
Stone diameter (in mm) compared between manual segmentation and radiology report (paired t-test or wilcoxon rank sum test if non-normally distributed data)
Time frame: At time of CT examination (inclusion and follow up - expected average 12 weeks)
DICE-score for AI-segmentation of stones, compared to manual segmenation (gold standard)
Time frame: At time of CT examination (inclusion and follow up - expected average 12 weeks)
Comparison of differences in dicotomous proportions in paired data according to Newcombe
Time frame: At time of CT examination (inclusion and follow up - expected average 12 weeks)
Stone density (in Hounsfield Units) compared between manual segmentation and radiology report (paired t-test or wilcoxon rank sum test if non-normally distributed data)
Time frame: At time of CT examination (inclusion and follow up - expected average 12 weeks)
Distention of renal pelvis (in mm) compared between manual segmentation and radiology report (paired t-test or wilcoxon rank sum test if non-normally distributed data)
Time frame: At time of CT examination (inclusion and follow up - expected average 12 weeks)
Haussdorff distance for AI-segmentation of stones, compared to manual segmenation (gold standard)
Time frame: At time of CT examination (inclusion and follow up - expected average 12 weeks)
Diagnostic accuracy for AI-segmentation of stones compared to manual segmenation (gold standard)
Time frame: At time of CT examination (inclusion and follow up - expected average 12 weeks)
DICE-score for AI-segmentation of renal pelvis compared to manual segmenation (gold standard)
Time frame: At time of CT examination (inclusion and follow up - expected average 12 weeks)
Hausdorff distance for AI-segmentation of renal pelvis compared to manual segmenation (gold standard)
Time frame: At time of CT examination (inclusion and follow up - expected average 12 weeks)
Diagnostic accuracy for AI-segmentation of renal pelvis compared to manual segmenation (gold standard)
Time frame: At time of CT examination (inclusion and follow up - expected average 12 weeks)
DICE-score for AI-segmentation of renal parenchyma compared to manual segmenation (gold standard)
Time frame: At time of CT examination (inclusion and follow up - expected average 12 weeks)
Hausdorff distance for AI-segmentation of renal parenchyma compared to manual segmenation (gold standard)
Time frame: At time of CT examination (inclusion and follow up - expected average 12 weeks)
Diagnostic accuracy for AI-segmentation of renal parenchyma compared to manual segmenation (gold standard)
Time frame: At time of CT examination (inclusion and follow up - expected average 12 weeks)
Comparison of differences in dicotomous proportions in paired data according to Newcombe
Oslo University Hospital
Other
Acronym: RISUS_AI
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04594161
Acute Kidney Injury, Bites and Stings
Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT07736924
Calculi, Female Urogenital Diseases
Malatya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04112160
Calculi, Female Urogenital Diseases
Dallas, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06083051
Calculi, Female Urogenital Diseases
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
View Trial Details