Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04856228

Radial Tunnel Syndrome in Resistant Lateral Epicondylitis

Lateral elbow pain can be difficult to diagnose because of the different pathologies or combinations of pathologies that can cause this clinic. Although lateral epicondylitis is the most common cause of lateral elbow pain, symptoms of radial tunnel syndrome may masquerade as lateral epicondylitis or they can be seen together with rate of 21-41%. The aim of the study is; to evaluate the presence of radial tunnel syndrome in the patients who have resistant lateral epicondylitis.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Lateral epicondylitis (LE), also known as "tennis elbow," is an overuse syndrome of the common extensor tendon (CET), predominantly affecting the extensor carpi radialis brevis. History and physical examination including manual provocation tests are key elements for the diagnosis.

Ultrasound imaging of the CET is an important complementary method to the clinical diagnosis of LE. It provides information about the severity of the disease with evidence of tendon thickening, focal/diffuse areas of decreased echogenicity in the tendon, epicondylar cortical irregularity or spur formation, and increased vascularity in case of local inflammation depicted by power- Doppler imaging.

Radial tunnel syndrome (RTS) is a dynamic/intermittent compression neuropathy of the radial nerve, where different structures can potentially compress the nerve. Local inflammatory and/or vascular changes (scarring, fibrosis), which are seen in LE may lead to compression of the radial nerve or its branches (especially the deep branch) at the radial tunnel. While RTS can often be the cause of refractory LE, some patients with LE actually have RTS concomitantly. The diagnosis of RTS is difficult/controversial due to inconclusive findings on electrophysiological tests and its close relationship with LE. Ultrasound is a superior imaging modality that can be used as an adjunct to electromyography for the evaluation of peripheral nerve problems. It can be used to diagnose compression neuropathies and to identify the entrapment site of the nerve. For the exact diagnosis of RTS complete relief should be achieved with a nerve block at the radial tunnel. Patients who have RTS coexisting with LE (18-43%) usually experience incomplete relief.

The purpose of the study is; to evaluate the RTS and LE with physical examination, special clinical tests, electrophysiological and ultrasonographic examinations and, to confirm the presence of RTS accompanying LE with the evaluation of clinical findings after the posterior interosseous nerve and lateral epicondyle diagnostic injections.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18-65 years
  • Had persistent lateral elbow pain at least 6 months' duration with suspected lateral epicondylitis
  • Be able to understand enough Turkish to complete the outcome questionnaire
  • Patients whose informed consent was obtained for paticipation in the study

Exclusion criteria

  • Fibromyalgia
  • History of surgery in the elbow
  • History of fracture that cause the deformity at radius/ulna
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Inflammatuar arthropathy in upper extremities
  • Osteoarthritis in the upper extremities
  • Neurological disabilities that effect the upper extremity functions
  • Cervical radiculopathy that effect the level of C6-C7

Treatment and study plan

diagnostic posterior interosseous nerve lidocaine injection

Diagnostic Test

ultrasound guided posterior interosseous nerve and lateral epicondyle 1 ml 2% lidocaine injection

Other names: diagnostic lateral epicondyle lidocaine injection

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline Pain via Nurmerical Rating Scale at 30 Minutes after PIN/Lateral Epicondyle Injection

    Time frame: Baseline, 30 minutes after PIN injection, 30 minutes after lateral epicondyle injection

    Pain of the participants will be assessed by one of the most commonly used pain scale "numerical rating scale". It is numeric version of visual analog scale in which a patient selects a whole number (0-10 integers) that best reflects the intensity of his/her pain. The 11-point numeric scale ranges from '0' representing "no pain" to '10' representing "pain as bad as you can imagine". Participant is asked to indicate rates of their pain on the day of presentation during resting, during function and physical examination as a baseline and, 30 minutes after PIN injection for each, 30 minutes after lateral apicondyle injection for each.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Grip strength via dynamometer

    Time frame: Baseline

    Handgrip strength was measured by using a Jamar Hand Dynamometer with patients seated, their elbow by their side and flexed to right angles, and a neutral wrist position. Three measurements were performed for both side, and the mean score was recorded (effected site and dominancy were noted)

  2. The Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE)

    Time frame: Baseline

    PRTEE is a validated pain severity and functional disability scale that assesses pain (5 questions graded 0 to 10) and functional disability (10 questions graded 0 to 10). Functional scores are then halved and added to pain scores. The minimum score is 0 (no pain or disability) and the maximum is 100 (severe pain and disability)

  3. Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire

    Time frame: Baseline

    The DASH is a validated questionnaire designed to measure upper limb disability and symptoms. Functional domains include physical, social, and psychological. It uses a single-scale, 30-item questionnaire of upper extremity function and symptoms. The minimum sum score is 30 points; the maximumscore is 150 points

  4. The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36)

    Time frame: Baseline

    SF-36 is a popular instrument for evaluating Health-Related Quality of Life and commonly used, general health assessment that is reliable and valid for overall outcome. It measures eight scales: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional, and mental health

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Ultrasonographic and Electrophysiological Evaluation of The Presence of Radial Tunnel Syndrome in Patients With Resistant Lateral Epicondylitis

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Apr 23, 2021
Registry last updated
Feb 18, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.