Department of Sports Orthopaedics, Technical University of Munich
Munich, Bavaria, 81675, Germany
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07172568
The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Blood Flow Restriction Training for the treatment of lateral elbow epicondylopathy.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Munich, Bavaria, 81675, Germany
Location status: Recruiting
Question: Does the implementation of a BFR-protocol in the physiotherapeutic treatment of epicondylopathia humeri radialis lead to a significantly pain relief and function improvement in the affected hand? Hypothesis: The implementation of a BFR-protocol in the physiotherapeutic treatment leads to a significantly pain relief an function improvement in comparison to a cohort without BFR.
Physiotherapy treatment will be performed according to the current evidence-based protocol in the Department and Polyclinic for Sports Orthopedics of the Klinikum rechts der Isar of the Technical University of Munich twice a week over a period of six weeks. Randomization will be done by the treating physiotherapist(s) before the first physiotherapy session. Before the start of the first therapy unit (T1), as well as after completion of the six-week intervention (T2), six weeks after completion of therapy (T3) and again 12 weeks aufter completion of the physiotherapeutic treatment (T4), both clinical examinations to assess the progress of therapy by a blinded study physician and the completion of a standardized questionnaire by the subject will take place. No travel or expense allowance is provided. During the clinical examination, the joint status as well as the clinical signs of epicondylopathia radialis humeri will be collected. Further data collection is performed by means of questionnaires.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
In the intervention group, 50% of limb occlussion pressure are applied to the extremity during exercises.
In the control group, 20 mmHg are applied to the extremity during exercises.
Time frame: 3 months
VAS at rest and at dorsal extension of the hand. Measuring the pain on a scale from 1-10. 1 means no pain and 10 means extreme pain. The investigators are measuring the pain on the VAS scale once before and three times after the intervention within a time frame of 3 Months (directly after the intervention, 6 weeks after the intervention and 12 Weeks after the intervention).
A higher score means a worse outcome, a lower score means a better outcome.
Time frame: 3 Months
The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) is a clinical tool used to assess the function of the elbow joint, particularly in patients with elbow disorders or after treatment (e.g., surgery). It evaluates pain, range of motion, function, and elbow stability.
Range of Scores: 0 to 100. 100 represents excellent elbow function with no pain. 75-89 is considered good, 60-74 is fair, and below 60 is poor.
Scores are assessed before and three times after the intervention:
Immediately post-intervention. 6 weeks post-intervention. 12 weeks post-intervention. This allows tracking of elbow recovery and functional improvement over time. A higher score indicates better recovery and elbow function.
Time frame: 3 Months
It is a questionnaire which is answered by the patients. The SF-36 (Short Form 36) Health Survey is a widely used questionnaire designed to assess an individual's overall health status. It measures eight domains of health:
Physical Functioning Role Physical Role Emotional Mental Health Vitality (Energy/Fatigue) Social Functioning Pain General Health Each domain is scored on a scale from 0 to 100, with 0 representing the worst health status and 100 representing the best. The scores are then used to evaluate physical and mental health, as well as the impact of health on daily functioning.
Range of Scores: 0-100 for each domain. Higher scores represent better health and functioning. Lower scores indicate greater impairment or worse health status. It helps in understanding an individual's quality of life and the impact of disease or disability on their physical and mental well-being.
It is commonly used to evaluate patient health outcomes.
Time frame: 3 Months
The DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) questionnaire is a tool used to assess the physical function and symptoms in patients with musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb. It evaluates function and pain in daily activities.
Range of Scores: 0 to 100. 0 represents no disability (full function, no pain). 100 represents maximum disability (severe limitation and pain).
The DASH score is typically measured before and three times after an intervention:
Immediately post-intervention. 6 weeks post-intervention. 12 weeks post-intervention. Lower scores indicate better function and less disability, while higher scores show greater functional impairment and pain. The DASH helps to monitor recovery and the effectiveness of treatments for upper limb conditions.
Time frame: 3 Months
The Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) is a questionnaire specifically designed to assess the severity of symptoms and the impact of lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow) on a patient's daily life. It evaluates pain and function in the elbow, particularly in activities related to gripping and arm movement.
Range of Scores: 0 to 100. 0 represents no pain or disability. 100 represents maximum pain or disability.
The PRTEE is typically assessed before and three times after an intervention:
Immediately post-intervention. 6 weeks post-intervention. 12 weeks post-intervention. Lower scores indicate less pain and disability, while higher scores suggest greater severity of symptoms. It is used to track the patient's progress and recovery from tennis elbow over time.
Time frame: 3 Months
clinical Evaluation including: Range of Motion
Time frame: 3 Months
Strength-Measurement: Dorsal extension of the hand using a dynamometer (MicroFET 2, Hoggan Scientific, Salt Lake City, USA). Measuring the affected elbow and the non-affected elbow
Time frame: 3 Months
statistical measurement of patients drop-out-quote using a Questionnaire about potential change to surgical Interventions or another type of therapy.
statistical measurement of Lost to follow-up patients
Time frame: 3 Months
A clinical examination of the elbow is performed. The focus here is on the examination of possible instability in the elbow joint. To this end, valgus-axis stress is applied and the ability to open the joint is checked.
The examination is assessed before and three times after an intervention:
Foldability and instability indicate a poor outcome
Time frame: 3 Months
clinical evaluation of the elbow using Epicondylitis Tests (Cozen-Test)
Time frame: 3 Months
clinical evaluation of the elbow using Epicondylitis Tests (Reversed-Cozen-Test)
Time frame: 3 Months
clinical evaluation of the elbow using Epicondylitis Tests (Maudsley-Test)
Time frame: 3 Months
A clinical examination of the elbow is performed. The focus here is on the examination of possible instability in the elbow joint. To this end the milking maneuver is examined with possible medial opening.
The examination is assessed before and three times after an intervention:
Foldability and instability indicate a poor outcome
Time frame: 3 Months
A clinical examination of the elbow is performed. The focus here is on the examination of possible instability in the elbow joint. To this end the tweezer grip on the elbow are examined.
The examination is assessed before and three times after an intervention:
Foldability and instability indicate a poor outcome
Time frame: 3 Months
A clinical examination of the elbow is performed. The focus here is on the examination of possible instability in the elbow joint. To this end the pivot-shift test on the elbow is examined.
The examination is assessed before and three times after an intervention:
Foldability and instability indicate a poor outcome
Time frame: 3 months
A clinical examination of the elbow is performed. The focus here is on the examination of possible instability in the elbow joint. To this end, varus-axis stress is applied and the ability to open the joint is checked.
The examination is assessed before and three times after an intervention:
Foldability and instability indicate a poor outcome
Time frame: 3 Months
The questionnaire the investigators created, also contains individual questions that ask about possible confounders. These are questions about gender
Time frame: 3 Months
measuring secondary objective as a potential confounder
Time frame: 3 Months
The Return to Sports Rate is a measure used to assess the percentage of individuals who return to their pre-injury or pre-intervention level of sports activity following treatment or rehabilitation. It provides insight into how effectively a patient has recovered and whether they can resume their sports participation at a similar level to before the injury.
In this case, the investigators use a questionnaire to gather information about the type of sport, frequency, and weekly time commitment to sports activities.
By comparing the responses from these time points, the investigators can calculate the Return to Sports Rate. This rate is determined by assessing how many participants have returned to their previous levels of sports activity, or how close they are to their baseline sports participation after the intervention.
Time frame: 3 Months
The Return to Work Rate is a measure used to assess the percentage of individuals who are able to return to their pre-injury or pre-intervention work activities following treatment or rehabilitation. It helps to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention in enabling patients to resume their work duties. In this case, the investigators use a questionnaire to gather information about the type of work, work frequency, and the time commitment per week spent on work activities.
By comparing the responses from these time points, the investigators can calculate the Return to Work Rate. This rate is determined by assessing how many participants have returned to their previous work activities or how close they are to their baseline work participation after the intervention.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Alexandros Doucas, MD
CONTACT
Pavel Kadantsev, MD
CONTACT
Technical University of Munich
Other
Randomisierte, Kontrollierte Untersuchung Der Wirksamkeit Von Blood Flow Restriction (BFR)-Training Zur Behandlung Der Epicondylopathia Humeri Radialis
Acronym: EPIC-BFR
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05809622
Arm Injuries, Elbow Injuries
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06523114
Arm Injuries, Elbow Injuries
Seoul, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT06025565
Arm Injuries, Elbow Injuries
Cape May, New Jersey, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06815042
Arm Injuries, Elbow Injuries
Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
View Trial Details