Maastricht University
Venlo, Limburg, 5928 RC, Netherlands
NCT Number: NCT03565133
Rationale: The appearance of tastants in the small intestine following food ingestion results in the onset of digestion and absorption but can also result in the activation of a negative feedback mechanism from different parts of the intestine to the stomach, the small intestine and to the central nervous system. These processes inhibit food processing, appetite sensations and food intake, and furthermore they increase feelings of satiety and satiation. In this study, we aim to investigate the effects of oral sham feeding and intragastric delivery of a bitter tastant (quinine) on ad libitum food intake, satiation, gastrointestinal symptoms, and heart rate variability.
Objective: To investigate the effect of oral sham feeding and intragastric delivery of a bitter tastant on food intake.
Secondary Objective(s):
1. To compare the effect of oral sham feeding and intragastric delivery of a bitter tastant on satiation. 2. To assess the effect of oral sham feeding and intragastric delivery of a bitter tastant on gastrointestinal symptoms/complaints. 3. To assess the effect of oral sham feeding and intragastric delivery of a bitter tastant on heart rate variability.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Venlo, Limburg, 5928 RC, Netherlands
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Oral sham feeding with quinine
A gastric capsule containing quinine
Oral sham feeding with placebo (tap water)
A gastric capsule containing placebo (cellulose)
Time frame: on each test day at T= 50, 50 minutes after ingestion of the capsule and sham-feeding
Difference in ad libitum meal intake (as measured during ad libitum pasta meal)
Time frame: At T= -20 mins, T= -10 mins, T=0 mins, T= 10 mins, T= 20 mins, T= 30 mins, T= 40 mins, T=50 and T= end, where T= 0 is ingestion of capsule and sham-feeding and T= end is whenever the participant finishes the test meal given at T= 50 mins.
Difference in satiation/satiety (as measured by VAS 0-100mm). VAS scores for satiety feelings (e.g., satiety, fullness, hunger, prospective feeding, desire to eat, desire to snack) will be measured using Visual Analogue Scales (VAS, 0 to 100 mm) anchored at the low end with the most negative or lowest intensity feelings (e.g., extremely unpleasant, not at all), and with opposing terms at the high end (e.g., extremely pleasant, very high, extreme). Volunteers will be asked to indicate on a line which place on the scale best reflects their feeling at that moment. The scoring forms will be collected immediately so that they cannot be used as a reference for later scorings.
Time frame: At T= -20 mins, T= -10 mins, T=0 mins, T= 10 mins, T= 20 mins, T= 30 mins, T= 40 mins, T=50 and T= end, where T= 0 is ingestion of capsule and sham-feeding and T= end is whenever the participant finishes the test meal given at T= 50 mins.
Difference in gastro-intestinal symptoms (as measured by VAS 0-100mm). VAS scores for gastrointestinal symptoms (burning, bloating, belching, cramps, colics, warm sensation, sensation of abdominal fullness, nausea, pain and relaxation/tensness) will be measured using Visual Analogue Scales (VAS, 0 to 100 mm) anchored at the low end with the most negative or lowest intensity feelings (e.g., extremely unpleasant, not at all), and with opposing terms at the high end (e.g., extremely pleasant, very high, extreme). Volunteers will be asked to indicate on a line which place on the scale best reflects their feeling at that moment. The scoring forms will be collected immediately so that they cannot be used as a reference for later scorings.
Time frame: At T= -150 mins, T= -15 mins, T= 5 mins, and T= 35 mins, where T= -150 is 150 minutes before ingestion of standardized breakfast meal, T= 0 mins is ingestion of capsule and sham-feeding.
Difference in heartrate variability
Maastricht University Medical Center
Other
The Effect of Quinine on Food Intake: Oral Sham Feeding Versus Intragastric Delivery
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05742165
Behavior, Body Weight
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05882045
Body Weight, Cardiovascular Diseases
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05929079
Apnea, Body Weight
Anniston, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00342732
Body Weight, Nutrition Disorders
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details