Acibadem Fulya Hospital, Sport Medicine Center
Istanbul, Besiktas, 34349, Turkey (Türkiye)
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07671729
This prospective randomized clinical trial aims to compare quadriceps tendon and peroneus longus tendon autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury undergoing primary reconstruction surgery will be randomly assigned to one of the two graft groups. Clinical examination findings, return-to-sport outcomes, ankle muscle strength, ankle-related functional scores, and gait analysis parameters will be evaluated at 6 months and 12 months postoperatively. The study aims to investigate both knee-related functional outcomes and donor site morbidity associated with graft harvesting techniques.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–50 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Istanbul, Besiktas, 34349, Turkey (Türkiye)
Location status: Recruiting
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is one of the most commonly performed orthopedic procedures for restoring knee stability and enabling return to sports activities after ACL injury. Various autograft options have been described for ACL reconstruction, including hamstring tendon, bone-patellar tendon-bone, quadriceps tendon, and more recently, peroneus longus tendon grafts. Each graft option has unique biomechanical characteristics, advantages, and potential donor site morbidities.
Quadriceps tendon autografts have gained increasing popularity because of their adequate graft diameter, favorable biomechanical properties, and relatively low donor site complications. Peroneus longus tendon autografts have also emerged as a promising alternative graft source with satisfactory clinical outcomes and sufficient graft size. However, concerns remain regarding donor site morbidity, particularly potential effects on ankle muscle strength and ankle function following peroneus longus tendon harvesting.
This prospective randomized study aims to compare quadriceps tendon and peroneus longus tendon autografts in patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction. Patients will be randomly assigned into two groups according to graft type. Clinical evaluations, functional knee scores, return-to-sport outcomes, ankle muscle strength assessments, ankle-related functional scores, and gait analysis parameters will be assessed during postoperative follow-up.
Follow-up evaluations will be performed at 6 months and 12 months after surgery. The findings of this study are expected to contribute to graft selection strategies in ACL reconstruction by providing comparative data regarding clinical outcomes, functional recovery, gait characteristics, and donor site morbidity.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction performed using quadriceps tendon autograft.
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction performed using peroneus longus tendon autograft.
Time frame: 12 months postoperatively
Comparison of postoperative subjective knee function between quadriceps tendon and peroneus longus tendon autograft groups using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation form.
Time frame: Assessment of return to pre-injury level of sports activity following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
6 and 12 months postoperatively
Time frame: 6 and 12 months postoperatively
Isokinetic ankle plantar flexion strength will be evaluated using an isokinetic dynamometer. Peak torque (Nm) during plantar flexion will be recorded and compared between study groups.
Time frame: 6 and 12 months postoperatively
Isokinetic ankle dorsiflexion strength will be evaluated using an isokinetic dynamometer. Peak torque (Nm) during dorsiflexion will be recorded and compared between study groups.
Time frame: 6 and 12 months postoperatively
Isokinetic ankle inversion strength will be evaluated using an isokinetic dynamometer. Peak torque (Nm) during inversion will be recorded and compared between study groups.
Time frame: 6 and 12 months postoperatively
Isokinetic ankle eversion strength will be evaluated using an isokinetic dynamometer. Peak torque (Nm) during eversion will be recorded and compared between study groups.
Time frame: 6 and 12 months postoperatively
Isokinetic ankle rotational strength will be evaluated using an isokinetic dynamometer. Peak torque (Nm) during rotational movements will be recorded and compared between study groups.
Time frame: 6 and 12 months postoperatively
Lower extremity biomechanical performance will be assessed using the VALD ForceDecks dual force plate system. Ground reaction force (N) during standardized standing and functional testing tasks will be recorded and compared between study groups.
Time frame: 6 and 12 months postoperatively
Lower extremity biomechanical performance will be assessed using the VALD ForceDecks dual force plate system. Force asymmetry (%) during standardized standing and functional testing tasks will be recorded and compared between study groups.
Time frame: 6 and 12 months postoperatively
Lower extremity biomechanical performance will be assessed using the VALD ForceDecks dual force plate system. Weight distribution (%) during standardized standing and functional testing tasks will be recorded and compared between study groups.
Acibadem University
Other
A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Quadriceps Tendon and Peroneus Longus Tendon Autografts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Clinical, Functional, and Gait Analysis Outcomes
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06357091
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
Schwaz, Tyrol, Austria
View Trial DetailsNCT04650568
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03348995
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07564336
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Failure, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Graz, Styria, Austria
View Trial Details