Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04581434

Psychotherapy for PTSD Among Veterans Also Receiving Drug or Alcohol Treatment

Many people who have posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) also struggle with problematic alcohol or drug use (substance use disorders [SUD]). Patients with both conditions prefer PTSD be treated alongside SUD. However, clinicians don't know if treatments that have been found to help those with PTSD work as well for people who also have SUD. This often leads to delaying PTSD treatment or using psychotherapies without research support. Trauma-focused psychotherapy (TFT) is the type of psychotherapy for PTSD that has been studied most often among people with both PTSD and SUD. It reduces symptoms of PTSD and substance use, although it might not work as well in those who have SUD as those who do not. Further, many patients with both PTSD and SUD do not complete TFT. Another strategy for treating PTSD is non-trauma-focused psychotherapy (NTFT). One NTFT, Present Centered Therapy, has been found to reduce symptoms of PTSD and more patients are able to complete NTFT than are able to finish TFT. However, no one has studied how well Present Centered Therapy works among patients who also have SUD.

We will test which approach (TFT of NTFT) is better for reducing symptoms of PTSD and which is more likely to be completed by patients with both PTSD and SUD at VA healthcare facilities. We will also test to see whether some participants did better than others, so we can learn how to individualize treatment recommendations to patients. Participants will be assigned by chance to either TFT of NTFT. Patients assigned to TFT will receive either Prolonged Exposure or Cognitive Processing Therapy; both are weekly psychotherapies focused on addressing thoughts and/or memories related to their trauma. Those assigned to NTFT will receive Present Centered Therapy, a weekly psychotherapy in which patients learn about how PTSD relates to their current difficulties and problem solve current life difficulties. All participants will also receive SUD treatment. Participants will answer questions about their symptoms and experience with treatment before, right after they finish, and three and six months after they finish PTSD treatment. At the end of the study we will compare which treatment approach worked better to decrease PTSD symptom severity and which treatment patients were better able to complete. We will also track other outcomes that are important to patients (e.g., how they are doing in their relationships).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

San Diego VA Healthcare System, San Diego, California, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Background and Significance: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance use disorder (SUD) comorbidity is common. The Veterans Affairs (VA)/Department of Defense Clinical Practice Guideline for PTSD strongly recommends providing guideline-concurrent care for PTSD alongside SUD treatment, but there is insufficient evidence about which guideline-recommended treatments for PTSD work best in this population. Trauma-focused therapy (TFT) is a frontline treatment approach; yet its effectiveness is less well-established among patients with co-occurring SUD, and TFT dropout rates are uniquely high in this population. Multiple guidelines suggest non-trauma-focused treatment (NTFT) as a second-line treatment approach for PTSD; higher completion rates for some NTFT (e.g., Present Centered Therapy) may make this strategy particularly effective for those with comorbid SUD. Despite providers' desire for an NTFT option for patients with PTSD/SUD, no guideline-recommended NTFTs have been evaluated in those with the comorbidity

Study Aims: Our long-term objective is to improve the lives of patients with co-occurring PTSD and SUD. To meet this objective, we will conduct a pragmatic randomized clinical trial that will yield decisive data regarding the comparative effectiveness of two evidence-based approaches for the treatment of PTSD in this understudied patient population: trauma-focused and non-trauma-focused psychotherapy. The major aims are: (1) Determine whether TFT differs at a clinically-meaningful magnitude from NTFT in its effects on posttreatment PTSD symptoms among patients with co-occurring PTSD and SUD (2) Determine whether patients with co-occurring PTSD and SUD randomized to TFT drop out of PTSD treatment more often than those randomized to NTFT, and (3) Determine if TFT differs at a clinically-meaningful level from NTFT in PTSD symptom reduction and number of PTSD therapy sessions attended in patients with varying (a) levels of baseline SUD severity, (b) classes of misused substances, and (c) treatment preferences.

Study Description: We propose a prospective, pragmatic randomized comparative effectiveness trial at 14 VA Medical Center sites (11 confirmed). Randomization will occur at the patient level and will assign participants to either (1) TFT (Prolonged Exposure or Cognitive Processing Therapy) or 2) NTFT (Present Centered Therapy). All participants will also receive concurrent SUD treatment-as-usual. Participants will complete self-report measures and a clinician-administered interview pretreatment, posttreatment, and six-months posttreatment. 420 participants (210 per arm) will be veterans seeking outpatient SUD treatment in an enrolled clinic who meet DSM-5 criteria for a current SUD and PTSD. The sample will be diverse in sex, race, age, and geography. Main outcomes will be PTSD symptom severity measured by the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5), and PTSD treatment dropout (dichotomous indicator of completion of all PTSD treatment sessions). Major Aim 1 will be tested using a linear mixed model using study intervention, assessment point, and their interaction as fixed effects and including random effects for participant, clinician, and study site. Major Aim 2 will be testing using a random effects logistic regression of therapy retention on intervention and baseline CAPS incorporating random effects for clinician and site.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Initiate an episode of outpatient SUD treatment at an enrolled facility.
  • meet DSM-5 criteria for a current SUD (Tobacco Use Disorder alone is not sufficient for inclusion).
  • Report substance use in the past 30 days (or in the 30 days prior to entering a controlled environment if exiting said controlled environment at time of enrollment)
  • meet DSM-5 criteria for PTSD
  • provide informed consent and be willing to be randomized to PTSD treatment condition
  • agree to not receive non-study, active psychotherapy for PTSD during study treatment

Exclusion criteria

  • Severe cognitive impairment
  • Current suicidal or homicidal intent with a specific plan
  • Unstable psychotic or manic symptoms not attributable to SUD
  • More than 30 days between index outpatient SUD intake/treatment planning appointment & consent or more than 90 days between the index outpatient SUD visit and the first PTSD psychotherapy session

Treatment and study plan

Prolonged Exposure Therapy

Behavioral

Prolonged Exposure Therapy is an individually-delivered treatment for PTSD that includes in vivo exposure to trauma reminders and imaginal exposure to the trauma memory delivered in 90-minute weekly sessions.

cognitive processing therapy

Behavioral

Cognitive Processing Therapy is an individually-delivered treatment for PTSD that focuses on challenging and modifying maladaptive beliefs related to the trauma, with an optional written trauma account during weekly 60-minute sessions

Present Centered Therapy

Behavioral

Present Centered Therapy is an individually-delivered treatment for PTSD that focuses on "current life problems as manifestations of PTSD" in weekly 60-minute sessions. It includes psychoeducation and normalization of responses to trauma, problem solving related to current life difficulties and stress identified by patients, and emotional support and validation

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinician Administered Scale for PTSD -5 (CAPS-5) Severity Score

    Time frame: Immediately after ending treatment

    PTSD Symptom Severity - Clinician Assessed; range 0-80; higher scores = greater severity.

  2. PTSD Treatment Non-completion

    Time frame: Immediately after ending treatment

    Proportion of veterans who do not complete a full course of assigned PTSD treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5)

    Time frame: Immediately after ending treatment

    PTSD Symptom Severity - Self-Reported; Range = 0-80; higher scores = more severe symptoms

  2. PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5)

    Time frame: 3-months after ending treatment

    PTSD Symptom Severity - Self-Reported; Range = 0-80; higher scores = more severe symptoms

  3. PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5)

    Time frame: 6-months after ending treatment

    PTSD Symptom Severity - Self-Reported; Range = 0-80; higher scores = more severe symptoms

  4. % Days with drug use or heavy drinking over prior 28 days

    Time frame: Immediately after ending treatment

    Substance use as measured by the Timeline Follow-Back Interview (TLFB)

  5. % Days with drug use or heavy drinking over prior 28 days

    Time frame: 3 months after ending treatment

    Substance use as measured by the Timeline Follow-Back Interview (TLFB)

  6. % Days with drug use or heavy drinking over prior 28 days

    Time frame: 6 months after ending treatment

    Substance use as measured by the Timeline Follow-Back Interview (TLFB)

  7. Clinician Administered Scale for PTSD -5 (CAPS-5) Severity Score

    Time frame: 3 months after treatment

    PTSD Symptom Severity - Clinician Assessed; range 0-80; higher scores = greater severity.

  8. Clinician Administered Scale for PTSD -5 (CAPS-5) Severity Score

    Time frame: 6 months after treatment

    PTSD Symptom Severity - Clinician Assessed; range 0-80; higher scores = greater severity.

  9. Short Inventory of Problems, Revised (SIP-R)

    Time frame: Immediately after treatment

    Problems associated with drug or alcohol use; range = 0-51, higher scores = more severe

  10. Short Inventory of Problems, Revised (SIP-R)

    Time frame: 3-months after treatment

    Problems associated with drug or alcohol use; range = 0-51, higher scores = more severe

  11. Short Inventory of Problems, Revised (SIP-R)

    Time frame: 6-months after treatment

    Problems associated with drug or alcohol use; range = 0-51, higher scores = more severe

  12. Brief Inventory of Psychosocial Functioning (BIPF)

    Time frame: Immediately after treatment

    PTSD-related psychosocial functioning; higher scores = more severe

  13. Brief Inventory of Psychosocial Functioning (BIPF)

    Time frame: 3 months after treatment

    PTSD-related psychosocial functioning; higher scores = more severe

  14. Brief Inventory of Psychosocial Functioning (BIPF)

    Time frame: 6 months after treatment

    PTSD-related psychosocial functioning; higher scores = more severe

  15. Insomnia Severity Index

    Time frame: Immediately after treatment

    Self-reported sleep disturbances; range 0-28; higher scores = more severe

  16. Insomnia Severity Index

    Time frame: 3 months after treatment

    Self-reported sleep disturbances; range 0-28; higher scores = more severe

  17. Insomnia Severity Index

    Time frame: 6 months after treatment

    Self-reported sleep disturbances; range 0-28; higher scores = more severe

  18. Dimensions of Anger Reactions (DAR)

    Time frame: Immediately after treatment

    Self-reporter anger; range = 2-25; higher scores = more severe

  19. Dimensions of Anger Reactions (DAR)

    Time frame: 3 months after treatment

    Self-reporter anger; range = 2-25; higher scores = more severe

  20. Dimensions of Anger Reactions (DAR)

    Time frame: 6 months after treatment

    Self-reporter anger; range = 2-25; higher scores = more severe

  21. WHO Quality of Life, Brief (WHOQOL-BREF)

    Time frame: Immediately after treatment

    Self-reported quality of life; higher score = better quality of life

  22. WHO Quality of Life, Brief (WHOQOL-BREF)

    Time frame: 3 months after treatment

    Self-reported quality of life; higher score = better quality of life

  23. WHO Quality of Life, Brief (WHOQOL-BREF)

    Time frame: 6 months after treatment

    Self-reported quality of life; higher score = better quality of life

  24. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

    Time frame: Immediately after treatment

    Self-reported depression; range = 0-27; higher scores = more severe symptoms

  25. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

    Time frame: Three months after treatment

    Self-reported depression; range = 0-27; higher scores = more severe symptoms

  26. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

    Time frame: Six months after treatment

    Self-reported depression; range = 0-27; higher scores = more severe symptoms

  27. Client Satisfaction Questionnaire - 8 (CSQ-8)

    Time frame: Immediately after treatment

    Treatment satisfaction; range = 8-32; higher scores = more severe symptoms

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Center for Veterans Research and Education

Other

Collaborators

  • Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center
  • Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Registry information

Official study title

Comparative Effectiveness of Trauma-Focused and Non-Trauma-Focused Treatment Strategies for PTSD Among Those With Co-Occurring SUD (COMPASS)

Acronym: COMPASS

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Oct 9, 2020
Registry last updated
Jun 25, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.