NCT Number: NCT07621731
This pragmatic, pathway-stratified, cluster-randomized waitlist-controlled trial evaluated Resilience-Oriented Therapy (RoT), a culturally adapted group-based psychosocial intervention for post-genocide Rwanda. Community screening assigned eligible adults to one of three RoT variant pathways based on presenting profile: emotion regulation, identity development, or behavioural self-management. Within each pathway, local clusters were randomized to immediate RoT or waitlist control. The baseline cohort included 427 participants across 52 clusters in five Rwandan districts. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and immediate post-intervention endline from April to September 2023.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Community and Health-Centre Settings, Ngoma District, Ngoma, Eastern Province, Rwanda
Resilience-Oriented Therapy (RoT) is a structured, trauma-informed, resilience-oriented group intervention developed for psychosocial recovery in post-genocide Rwanda. The intervention is organized around six broad phases: engagement and hope-building; psychoeducation about trauma, distress, and resilience; strengthening self-care and resilience practices; socioemotional skills acquisition; relational, socio-economic, and civic reintegration work; and follow-up or maintenance. Sessions were delivered by trained facilitators or mental-health practitioners.
The study used a pragmatic, pathway-stratified, cluster-randomized waitlist-controlled design. Participants were identified through a wider societal-healing screening process across five districts in Rwanda. Individuals with acute clinical risk were referred for appropriate clinical or hospital support. Remaining eligible adults were screened for intervention fit and routed to one of three RoT variants. The emotion-regulation variant (RoT-ER) targeted internalizing distress, including depression, anxiety, rumination, emotion dysregulation, and social withdrawal. The identity-development variant (RoT-ID) targeted alienation, shame, emptiness, identity disturbance, and belonging-related difficulties. The behavioural self-management variant (RoT-BSM) targeted aggression, alcohol or substance misuse, impulse regulation, and interpersonal responsibility.
Within each variant pathway, clusters were randomized to immediate RoT or waitlist control. Waitlist-control participants did not receive the assigned RoT variant during the baseline-to-endline evaluation period and were to be invited to participate after the evaluation exercise where feasible. The baseline cohort included 427 participants across 52 clusters: 173 in the RoT-ER pathway, 120 in the RoT-ID pathway, and 134 in the RoT-BSM pathway. Endline data were observed for 394 participants; missing endline records were handled in the manuscript analysis using multiple imputation.
The trial evaluated whether pathway-matched RoT improved clinical and psychosocial outcomes from baseline to immediate post-intervention endline. General outcomes included post-traumatic stress symptoms and resilience across all pathways. Variant-specific outcomes included depression and anxiety/cross-diagnostic symptoms in RoT-ER, borderline/identity disturbance symptoms in RoT-ID, and aggression, alcohol abuse/dependence, and drug abuse/dependence in RoT-BSM. Secondary outcomes included socioemotional difficulties, hopefulness/agency, forgiveness of others, stigma, social cohesion, perceived community threat, economic security, food insecurity, and food security.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
RoT-ER is a culturally adapted, group-based psychosocial intervention variant focused on internalizing distress. Sessions emphasize psychoeducation, emotion regulation, distress tolerance, self-care and resilience practices, hope and agency, and group-based social support.
Other names: RoT-ER, RoT Emotion-Regulation Variant
RoT-ID is a culturally adapted, group-based psychosocial intervention variant focused on alienation, shame, emptiness, identity disturbance, and belonging-related difficulties. Sessions emphasize coherent self-understanding, constructive social identity, relational repair, and resilience practices.
Other names: RoT-ID, RoT Identity-Development Variant
RoT-BSM is a culturally adapted, group-based psychosocial intervention variant focused on aggression, alcohol or substance misuse, impulse regulation, accountability, and interpersonal responsibility. Sessions emphasize self-management, responsible relationships, and reintegration into family and community life.
Other names: RoT-BSM, RoT Behavioral Self-Management Variant
Time frame: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months
Post-traumatic stress symptoms were measured with a genocide-adapted four-item mean score from the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. Items were rated from 0 to 4; the mean score ranges from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating worse post-traumatic stress symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Resilience was measured with the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale. Items were summed to a total score ranging from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater resilience.
Time frame: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Depression symptoms were measured with the Beck Depression Inventory-Short Form cognitive-affective subscale. The 13 items are summed to a total score ranging from 0 to 39, with higher scores indicating worse depression symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Anxiety and related cross-diagnostic symptoms were measured with a 10-item cross-diagnostic symptom severity scale. Scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating worse anxiety and related internalizing symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Borderline and identity-disturbance symptoms were measured with the McLean Screening Instrument for Borderline Personality Disorder. The 10 yes/no items are summed to a total score ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more borderline and identity-disturbance symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Aggression was measured with 13 retained items from the Aggression Questionnaire. Items were averaged to a mean score ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater aggression.
Time frame: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Alcohol abuse or dependence risk was measured with the six alcohol-use items from the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire. Yes/no items are summed to a total score ranging from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater alcohol abuse or dependence risk.
Time frame: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Drug abuse or dependence risk was measured with the six drug-use items from the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire. Yes/no items are summed to a total score ranging from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater drug abuse or dependence risk.
Time frame: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Emotional wellbeing difficulties were measured with the emotional-wellbeing subscale from the locally developed socioemotional-skills measure. Items were averaged to a mean score ranging from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater emotional-wellbeing difficulties.
Time frame: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Collaboration difficulties were measured with the collaboration subscale from the locally developed socioemotional-skills measure. Items were averaged to a mean score ranging from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater collaboration difficulties.
Time frame: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Self-management difficulties were measured with the self-management subscale from the locally developed socioemotional-skills measure. Items were averaged to a mean score ranging from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater self-management difficulties.
Time frame: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Hopefulness and agency were measured with four agency-oriented hope items. Items were averaged to a mean score ranging from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater hopefulness and agency.
Time frame: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Forgiveness of others was measured with a retained two-item mean score derived from the Heartland Forgiveness Scale after reliability review. Items were averaged to a mean score ranging from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater forgiveness of others.
Time frame: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Perceived stigma was measured with a five-item perceived stigma of mental illness scale adapted for the programme. Items were averaged to a mean score ranging from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater perceived stigma.
Time frame: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Social cohesion was measured with seven retained items from the Social Cohesion Scale used in the Rwanda societal-healing programme. Items were averaged to a mean score ranging from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater social cohesion.
Time frame: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Perceived community threat was measured with four items from the Social Cohesion Scale. Items were averaged to a mean score ranging from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater perceived community threat.
Time frame: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Economic security was measured with programme items assessing whether the household had enough money for basic needs. Items were averaged to a mean score ranging from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating greater economic security.
Time frame: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Short-term food insecurity was measured with Food Security Consumption Coping Strategy Index items covering the previous seven days. Scores range from 0 to 84, with higher scores indicating worse short-term food insecurity.
Time frame: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Long-term food insecurity was measured with Food Security Consumption Coping Strategy Index items covering the previous 12 months. Scores range from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating worse long-term food insecurity.
Time frame: Baseline to immediate post-intervention endline, up to 5 months.
Food security was measured with programme food-security items derived from the food-consumption coping strategy indicators. Scores range from 0 to 84, with higher scores indicating greater food security.
Alexandros Lordos, PhD
Other
A Pragmatic, Pathway-Stratified Cluster-Randomized Waitlist-Controlled Trial of Three Variants of Resilience-Oriented Therapy in Rwanda
Acronym: RoT-CRT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05344092
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Bedford, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04716400
Aberrant Motor Behavior in Dementia, Aggression
Bergen, Norway
View Trial DetailsNCT03749967
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06644573
Alzheimer Disease, Alzheimer Disease or Associated Disorder
Aventura, Florida, United States
View Trial Details