Institute of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo
São Paulo, 05403-010, Brazil
NCT Number: NCT01901315
The purpose of this project is to compare the effectiveness between face-to-face consultations and consultations via videoconferencing among patients treated in the Institute of Psychiatry (IPq).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–55 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
São Paulo, 05403-010, Brazil
Introduction: Within the emergence of the Internet and for the purposes of providing psychiatric services across distances, the provision of mental health service via video counseling has become a possible way of mental health service delivery. An appropriate systematization of the propaedeutic methods in psychiatry, according to the interactive resources of telemedicine, and a standardized assessment based on clinical records turn this method to a viable alternative for service delivery all over the world. The main benefit of video counseling is an increased access to care services. But, so far, there is still limited research regarding to the effectiveness of telepsychiatry in the management of mental illnesses.
Objective: To verify the applicability of psychiatric attendance via Interned-based videoconferencing, comparing various quality characteristics between this method and face-to-face attendance, on the basis of a one-year follow-up study with a randomized clinical trial (RCT) design.
Material and methods: 100 patients of the Institute of Psychiatry (IPq) between 18 to 55 years old with depressive disorders are randomly allocated to a control (monthly face-to-face consultation with the attending psychiatrist) or intervention group. The intervention group will have consultations with the attending psychiatrist through internet-based videoconference. For reasons of patient safety, consultations at baseline, and after 6 and 12 months will be realized in a face-to-face form for all patients. At baseline, and after 6 and 12 months mental health, satisfaction with treatment, therapeutic relationship, and medical compliance will be assessed. Depression will be assessed at baseline, and after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients in the online consultation (intervention) group have monthly consultation with their attending psychiatrist through videoconferencing during one year. After each consultation, the medication is sent to the patient through a home delivery program. For reasons of patient safety, consultations at baseline, and after 6 and 12 months will be realized in a face-to-face form at the Institute of Psychiatry (IPq).
Patients in the face-to-face consultation (control) group have monthly face-to-face consultation with their attending psychiatrist during one year at the Institute of Psychiatry (IPq).
Time frame: 0 months (baseline)
Instrument: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Time frame: 6 months
Instrument: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Time frame: 12 months
Instrument: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Time frame: 0 months (baseline)
Instrument: Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8)
Time frame: 6 months
Instrument: Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8)
Time frame: 12 months
Instrument: Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8)
Time frame: 0 months (baseline)
Instrument: Mental Health Inventory (MHI)
Time frame: 6 months
Instrument: Mental Health Inventory (MHI)
Time frame: 12 months
Instrument: Mental Health Inventory (MHI)
Time frame: 0 months (baseline)
Instrument: Working Alliance Inventory (WAI)
Time frame: 6 months
Instrument: Working Alliance Inventory (WAI)
Time frame: 12 months
Instrument: Working Alliance Inventory (WAI)
Time frame: 0 months (baseline)
Instrument: self-reported measure of medication adherence with four items:
Response categories are yes/no for each item with a dichotomous response and a 5-point Likert response for the last item.
Time frame: 6 months
Instrument: self-reported measure of medication adherence with four items:
Response categories are yes/no for each item with a dichotomous response and a 5-point Likert response for the last item.
Time frame: 12 months
Instrument: self-reported measure of medication adherence with four items:
Response categories are yes/no for each item with a dichotomous response and a 5-point Likert response for the last item.
Time frame: 0 months (baseline)
Age, Gender, Nationality, Marital Satus, Education, and Employment
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Assessment of technical aspects regarding to online consultations: sound quality, video quality, speed, technical support
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
Other
New Information and Communication Technologies in the Delivery of Mental Health Treatment: Psychiatric Care Via Videoconferencing
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03851380
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07741422
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06139016
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06942637
Adolescents, Anxiety
Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
View Trial Details