Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02189486

Prostate Cancer Upgrading Reference Set

Research repository designed to establish prostate cancer upgrading reference set and development of a risk prediction tool. Repository will include clinical information and biologics on a cohort of 240 men, to predict presence of high grade cancer at time of prostatectomy (removal of prostate) among patients with a low grade cancer diagnosis at time of biopsy.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

35 year–99 year

Sex eligibility

Male

Study type

Observational

Primary location

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States

About this study

The primary endpoint of this study is the presence of tumor upgrading at the time of radical prostatectomy. Upgrading is defined as: Gleason 3+4 or higher grade A secondary study endpoint is presence of prostate cancer beyond the prostate (pathologic T3 disease) at radical prostatectomy. (This finding may be considered as a rationale for treatment.) Evidence of pathologic stage T3 or higher disease will be assessed by the presence of: (1) seminal vesicle invasion or (2) positive surgical margins or (3) established extracapsular extension or (4) lymph node involvement by tumor. It should be noted that pathologic stage T3 disease, while generally portending a greater risk of disease recurrence, may not be an intrinsic feature of disease prognosis but can be an artifact of surgical technique. Nonetheless, a secondary risk assessment tool will include both a Gleason 7-10 endpoint plus any patients with pT3+ disease to a composite endpoint that could indicate disease best managed with treatment in lieu of active surveillance.Prostate cancer, confirmed on prostate biopsy, within two years of scheduled radical prostatectomy.

  • Prostate cancer must be graded as Gleason 3+3 on the biopsy immediately prior to radical prostatectomy. (Secondary eligibility will be established on central review of pathology slides, and blocks if available, at Cornell Central Pathology Laboratory to confirm eligibility.) 3. Prostate cancer may have been detected on prior biopsy as well but must not be greater than Gleason 3+3. (Also requires Central Pathology Laboratory review.) 4. Slides must be available for Central Pathology Laboratory review on any biopsy showing prostate cancer. FFPE (formalin fixed paraffin embedded) blocks may also be requested if available.
  • Patient must have selected radical prostatectomy as treatment for prostate cancer.
  • Signed informed consent. 7. Blocks and/or slides from prostate biopsy and from radical prostatectomy must be available for analysis by Central Pathology laboratory.
  • Willingness to provide long-term follow-up information regarding additional treatments and cancer status.
  • Willingness to provide blood and urine specimens prior to radical prostatectomy for placement in the Early Detection Research Network (EDRN) Upgrading Reference Set repository.
  • Willingness to provide demographic and clinical information related to prostate cancer and prostate cancer risk (e.g., race/ethnicity, family history of prostate cancer).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Prostate cancer, confirmed on prostate biopsy, within two years of scheduled radical prostatectomy.
  • Prostate cancer must be graded as Gleason 3+3 on the biopsy immediately prior to radical prostatectomy. (Secondary eligibility will be established on central review of pathology slides, and blocks if available, at Cornell Central Pathology Laboratory to confirm eligibility.)
  • Prostate cancer may have been detected on prior biopsy as well but must not be greater than Gleason 3+3. (Also requires Central Pathology Laboratory review.)
  • Slides must be available for Central Pathology Laboratory review on any biopsy showing prostate cancer. FFPE Blocks may also be requested if available.
  • Patient must have selected radical prostatectomy as treatment for prostate cancer.
  • Signed informed consent.
  • Blocks and/or slides from prostate biopsy and from radical prostatectomy must be available for analysis by Central Pathology laboratory.
  • Willingness to provide long-term follow-up information regarding additional treatments and cancer status.
  • Willingness to provide blood and urine specimens prior to radical prostatectomy for placement in the EDRN Upgrading Reference Set repository.
  • Willingness to provide demographic and clinical information related to prostate cancer and prostate cancer risk (e.g., race/ethnicity, family history of prostate cancer).

Exclusion criteria

  • Gleason score greater than 3+3 on any prior prostate biopsy.
  • Any treatment other than radical prostatectomy planned for prostate cancer.
  • Prior treatment of the prostate with androgen deprivation, radiation, or other cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Prostate cancer tumor upgrading at time of radical prostatectomy (Gleason 3+4 or higher grade)

    Time frame: 4 years

    The primary endpoint of this study is the presence of tumor upgrading at the time of radical prostatectomy. Upgrading is defined as: Gleason 3+4 or higher grade

Secondary outcomes

  1. Presence of prostate cancer beyond the prostate at radical prostatectomy (pathologic T3 disease)

    Time frame: 10 years

    A secondary study endpoint is presence of prostate cancer beyond the prostate (pathologic T3 disease) at radical prostatectomy. (This finding may be considered as a rationale for treatment.) Evidence of pathologic stage T3 or higher disease will be assessed by the presence of: (1) seminal vesicle invasion or (2) positive surgical margins or (3) established extracapsular extension or (4) lymph node involvement by tumor. It should be noted that pathologic stage T3 disease, while generally portending a greater risk of disease recurrence, may not be an intrinsic feature of disease prognosis but can be an artifact of surgical technique. Nonetheless, a secondary risk assessment tool will include both a Gleason 7-10 endpoint plus any patients with pT3+ disease to a composite endpoint that could indicate disease best managed with treatment in lieu of active surveillance.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

Other

Collaborators

  • Eastern Virginia Medical School
  • Emory University
  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)
  • Stanford University
  • The Cleveland Clinic
  • University of California, Irvine
  • University of Miami
  • University of Michigan
  • University of Washington
  • Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Registry information

Official study title

Biomarkers and Clinical Parameters Associated With Gleason Score Upgrading

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jul 14, 2014
Registry last updated
Jan 7, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.