Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01544907

Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing DEB Versus Conventional PTA for the Treatment of Hemodialysis AVF or AVG Stenoses

A prospective randomized trial comparing the efficacy of drug eluting balloon angioplasty versus conventional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty balloon for the treatment of hemodialysis arterio-venous fistula or arterio-venous graft stenoses in reducing late luminal loss and restenosis rates, while prolonging primary and secondary patencies.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Introduction:

Neointimal hyperplasia is the main cause of hemodialysis access [arterio-venous fistula (AVF) or graft (AVG)] dysfunction and thrombosis. Although endovascular techniques like percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), catheter directed thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy or bare metal stenting, may salvage the access, long term patency remains dismal due to recurrent stenosis from neointimal hyperplasia.

Drug Eluting Balloon (DEB) is effective in inhibiting neointimal hyperplasia for treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis since 2006 and more recently in femoropopliteal arteries, reducing restenosis rates and prolonging patency.

Specific Aim:

To determine the efficacy of DEB in reducing restenosis rates and prolonging the patency of AVFs/AVGs compared to PTA.

Hypothesis:

DEB is superior to PTA in reducing late luminal loss and restenosis rates, while prolonging primary and secondary patencies.

Methodology:

Prospective, randomized clinical trial with study population comprising of patients with dysfunctional AVFs/AVGs due to underlying stenoses. The patients will be randomized to receive either DEB or PTA.

The 6-month late luminal loss will be primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints of restenosis rate, primary and secondary patencies, will also be determined.

Major Clinical Significance:

Hemodialysis access failures constitute significant morbidity and costs to patient and healthcare system. Maintaining access patency consumes significant resources and constitutes a significant portion of the work of vascular surgeons, nephrologists and interventional radiologists.

Any strategy that reduces access failure or prolonging access lifespan will be beneficial. If DEB is proven to be superior to PTA, there will be a paradigm shift in management of hemodialysis access failures from restenosis - similar to how DEB has changed practice in managing coronary artery in-stent restenosis.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Upper limb or groin AVF/AVG
  • The AVF/AVG is > 3 months old.
  • Native vessel measures between 4 to 7 mm diameter (corresponding to the sizes of available DEBs).
  • The fistula or graft must not be thrombosed.
  • Able to cross with guide wire
  • Platelet count >50,000/l (platelet infusion if <100,000/l)
  • PT/PTT not more than 3 seconds above normal (FFP infusion for abnormal PT/PTT)

Exclusion criteria

  • Uncorrectable coagulopathy (despite transfusion) or hypercoagulable state.
  • Evidence of systemic infection or a local infection associated with the fistula or graft.
  • The patient is < 21 years of age.
  • The patient is pregnant.
  • Patient is enrolled in another investigational study
  • Patient has comorbid conditions that may limit their ability to comply with the follow-up requirement.
  • Life expectancy < 6 months

Treatment and study plan

Conventional PTA

Device

Use of conventional balloon for angioplasty only

Other names: REEF angioplasty balloon (Manufacturer Medtronic)

Drug Eluting Balloon (DEB)

Device

Use of DEB after conventional balloon angioplasty

Other names: IN.PACT ADMIRAL Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon (Medtronic)

Primary outcomes

  1. Late luminal loss

    Time frame: 6 months

    Late luminal loss is defined as the difference between the minimum lumen diameters after angioplasty and at the end of the 6-month follow-up angiogram.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Restenosis rate

    Time frame: 6 months

    Restenosis rate is defined as the incidence of stenosis ≥50% of the diameter of the reference vessel segment.

  2. Primary patency

    Time frame: 6 months

    Primary patency is defined as the interval from balloon angioplasty until the next access thrombosis or repeated intervention to maintain access function, or until access abandonment if no interval intervention. It ends with treatment of a lesion anywhere within the access circuit, from the arterial inflow to the superior vena cava-right atrial junction.

  3. Primary assisted patency

    Time frame: 6 months

    Primary assisted patency is defined as the interval from balloon angioplasty until access thrombosis or a surgical intervention that excludes the treated lesion from the access circuit. Examples include percutaneous treatments of either restenosis/occlusion of the previously treated lesion or a new arterial or venous outflow stenosis/occlusion (excluding access thrombosis). It ends with percutaneous thrombolysis/thrombectomy or simple surgical thrombectomy.

  4. Secondary patency

    Time frame: 6 months

    Secondary patency is defined as the interval after balloon angioplasty until the access is surgically declotted, revised or abandoned because of inability to treat the original lesion, choice of surgeon, transplant, loss to follow-up, etc. Examples include thrombolysis and percutaneous thrombectomy, as well as multiple repetitive treatments.

  5. Anatomic success

    Time frame: Immediate post procedure

    Anatomic success is defined as <30% residual stenosis diameter measured immediately after angioplasty.

  6. Clinical success

    Time frame: Immediate post procedure

    Clinical success is defined as an improvement from baseline in the clinical or hemodynamic parameter (e.g., blood flow, venous pressures) that was the initial indicator of fistula/ graft dysfunction.

  7. Procedural success

    Time frame: Immediate post procedure

    Procedural success is defined as the combination of anatomic success and clinical success.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Singapore General Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • National Medical Research Council (NMRC), Singapore

Registry information

Official study title

Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Drug Eluting Balloon Angioplasty Versus Conventional Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty Balloon for the Treatment of Hemodialysis Arterio-Venous Fistula or Arterio-Venous Graft Stenoses

Acronym: DEBAPTA

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2013
First posted
Mar 6, 2012
Registry last updated
Nov 6, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.