Federal University of São Paulo
São Paulo, 04038002, Brazil
NCT Number: NCT05092152
Rapid-sequence intubation is routinely performed in critically ill patients. It is unclear whether different sedative agents may influence short-term outcomes after intubation, specially hemodynamic stability.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
São Paulo, 04038002, Brazil
The optimal and safest hypnotic agent for rapid sequence intubation in critically ill patients remains uncertain. Factors such as hypovolemia, vasoplegia, hypoxemia, and acidosis can influence the efficacy and safety of induction agents. Propofol is commonly used for this purpose; however, it is associated with the risk of exacerbating hypotension. Ketamine, which has a more favorable hemodynamic profile, may offer a safer alternative in these patients. Objective: To assess whether ketamine is a safer alternative to propofol for rapid sequence intubation by reducing the incidence of hypotension during induction in critically ill patients.
Methods: This will be a randomized, open-label, pragmatic, bicenter study. A total of 170 critically ill patients requiring endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit will be randomly assigned to receive either ketamine or propofol as the hypnotic agent. Randomization will be conducted using RedCap with a 1:1 ratio and variable block sizes, stratified by study site and vasopressor use during intubation. Results: The primary outcome will be the occurrence of hypotension, defined as the lowest mean arterial pressure recorded within the first 10 minutes following induction. Secondary outcomes, assessed within 1 hour post-induction, include mortality, incidence of cardiopulmonary arrest, the occurrence of severe hypotension (systolic blood pressure <80mmHg), the occurrence of severe hypoxemia (oxygen saturation < 85%), and the number of intubation attempts. Conclusion: The PROMINE study will provide valuable evidence to guide the selection of hypnotic agents for rapid sequence intubation in critically ill patients. It will contribute to a better understanding of the hemodynamic effects associated with propofol and ketamine in this context, potentially informing clinical practice.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
2 mg per kilogram of body weight
1.5 mg per kilogram of body weight
Time frame: Ten minutes after induction
For the primary outcome, a pre-specified subgroup analysis will evaluate the following groups: patients < 70 versus ≥ 70 years old; patients with a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score < 8 versus ≥ 8 points; patients on vasopressor versus without vasopressors; and patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) versus those without ARDS. Each subgroup analysis will be performed using linear regression, adjusted for baseline MAP before induction, total vasopressor dose in the first 10 minutes, age, and a random patient intercept. Effect estimates will be reported as mean differences with 95%CIs for each subgroup, with respective interaction p values. We will not adjust for multiplicity.
Time frame: 1 hour
Average MAP within the first hour after induction
Time frame: 01 hour
Death within one hour of intubation
Time frame: 01 hour
Cardiac arrest requiring resuscitation
Time frame: 01 hour
Systolic blood pressure below 80 mmHg
Time frame: 01 hour
Peripheral oxygen saturation below 85%
Time frame: 01 hour
Time for successful intubation
Time frame: 01 hour
The number of intubation attempts
Time frame: 01 hour
The highest heart rate (HR) within one hour after induction
Time frame: 24 hours after intubation
Cumulative, in milligrams, dose of vasopressors used
Time frame: 01 hour
Mean change in vasopressor dose (norepinephrine equivalent) from baseline to hour 1
Time frame: 07 days
Ventilator-free days within the first 7 days, defined as the number of days on which individuals are able to breathe spontaneously without any invasive ventilatory assistance, ascribing zero days to those who die, within 7 days.
Time frame: Seven days
Mortality at day 7
Time frame: 60 days
Mortality in the Intensive Care Unit
Time frame: 60 days
Mortality in hospital
Time frame: the first 10 minutes
Number of participants with Hypertension, defined as SBP > 180 mmHg Safety outcomes during the first 10 minutes
Time frame: 10 minutes
Laryngospasm, as reported by the physician in charge of intubation - safety outcome
Time frame: 10 minutes
Bradycardia, defined as HR < 45 bpm - safety outcome
Time frame: 10 minutes
Arrhythmias - safety outcome
Time frame: 10 minutes
Bronchoaspiration, defined as the presence of gastric content aspirated into the airway during intubation
Federal University of São Paulo
Other
Propofol Versus Ketamine for Rapid Sequence Intubation in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized, Multicenter, Unblinded, Clinical Trial
Acronym: PROMINE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06876168
Acute Respiratory Failure, Infections
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02723565
Acute Respiratory Failure, Pathologic Processes
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07366541
Acute Respiratory Failure, Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT)
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05423301
Acute Respiratory Failure
Pessac, France
View Trial Details