Prophylaxis Study of Recombinant Factor VIII Manufactured Protein-Free (rAHF-PFM) in Patients With Hemophilia A

Participants were Randomized to Receive 1 of the 2 Following Prophylaxis Regimens (Study Part 2): 1. Standard prophylaxis (20-40 IU/kg (every 48 ±6 hour), exact regimen determined by investigator) 2. PK-driven prophylaxis (20-80 IU/kg (every 72 ±6 hour), exact regimen determined by sponsor) Annualized bleed rates were transformed using the square root of the number of bleeding episodes observed (X = bleeds/year), X' = √(X + 0.5). This transformation was performed to stabilize the variance and align the sample distribution with the assumption of normality inherent in using the t-test.

Participants were Randomized to Receive 1 of the 2 Following Prophylaxis Regimens (Part 2 of the study): 1. Standard prophylaxis- infusions every 48 ±6 hours, dosed at 20 to 40 IU/kg. 2. PK-driven prophylaxis- infusions every 72 ±6 hours dosed at 20 to 80 IU/kg.

Annualized bleed rates were transformed using the square root of the number of bleeding episodes observed (X bleeds/year), X' = √(X + 0.5). This transformation was performed to stabilize the variance and align the sample distribution with the assumption of normality inherent in using the paired t-test. Mean Difference of Transformed Annualized Bleeding Rate (TABR) = (On-Demand Treatment TABR) - (Standard Prophylaxis Treatment TABR). Participants from the On-Demand portion of the study were subsequently randomized to either Standard Prophylaxis or PK-Driven Prophylaxis, (i.e the same participants were analyzed across the two measurement time periods).

Annualized bleed rates were transformed using the square root of the number of bleeding episodes observed (X bleeds/year), X' = √(X + 0.5). This transformation was performed to stabilize the variance and align the sample distribution with the assumption of normality inherent in using the paired t-test. Mean Difference of Transformed Annualized Bleeding Rate (TABR) = (On-Demand Treatment TABR) - (PK-Driven Prophylaxis Treatment TABR) Participants from the On-Demand portion of the study were subsequently randomized to either Standard Prophylaxis or PK-Driven Prophylaxis, (i.e the same participants were analyzed across the two measurement time periods).

Annualized bleed rates were transformed using the square root of the number of bleeding episodes observed (X bleeds/year), X' = √(X + 0.5). This transformation was performed to stabilize the variance and align the sample distribution with the assumption of normality inherent in using the paired t-test. Mean Difference of Transformed Annualized Bleeding Rate (TABR) = (On-Demand Treatment TABR) - (Any Prophylaxis Treatment TABR). Any Prophylaxis = Standard or PK-Driven Prophylaxis Participants from the On-Demand portion of the study were subsequently randomized to either Standard Prophylaxis or PK-Driven Prophylaxis, (i.e the same participants were analyzed across the two measurement time periods).

Participants were Randomized to Receive 1 of the 2 Following Prophylaxis Regimens (Part 2 of the study): 1. Standard prophylaxis- infusions every 48 ±6 hours, dosed at 20 to 40 IU/kg. 2. PK-driven prophylaxis- infusions every 72 ±6 hours dosed at 20 to 80 IU/kg.

The number of bleeding episodes treated with 1, 2, 3, or ≥4 infusions of rAHF-PFM to achieve adequate hemostasis

Number of rAHF-PFM-treated bleeding episodes with an assessment of hemostasis (4-point ordinal scale): Excellent: Full pain relief & bleeding cessation within ~8 hrs of 1 infusion. Additional infusions may have been given to maintain hemostasis; Good: Definite pain relief and/or improvement in bleeding within ~8 hrs after infusion. Possibly requires >1 infusion for complete resolution; Fair: Probable or slight relief of pain & slight improvement in bleeding within ~8 hrs after infusion. Requires >1 infusion for complete resolution; None: No improvement or condition worsens

Total AUC estimated by AUC 0-48h plus an area extrapolated from the log-linear regression model

Area under the factor VIII (FVIII) plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from 0 to 48 hours estimated using the linear trapezoidal method

Maximal Factor VIII Concentration After Infusion

Change in factor VIII concentration from pre- to post-infusion at initial and termination study visits. Adjusted IR defined as: [Cmax (IU/dL) - pre-infusion FVIII (IU/dL)]/dose (IU/kg)

Computed from the regression slope in the terminal phase of the model. Terminal half life is the time it takes for the plasma concentration or the amount of drug in the body to be reduced by 50%.

Computed as the weight-adjusted dose divided by total AUC

Computed as total Area Under the Moment Curve (AUMC) divided by the total AUC

Computed as weight-adjusted clearance * mean residence time

Number of treated participants who developed factor VIII inhibitors

Number of treated participants with AEs judged to be possibly or probably related to treatment with IP

Number of treated participants with 1 or more AE regardless of relatedness to IP

This outcome is focused only on SEVERE SAEs and SEVERE non-SAEs

Physical Functioning (PF); Role Limitation Due to Physical Health (RP); Bodily Pain (BP); General Health (GH); Vitality (VT); Social Functioning (SF); Role Limitation Due to Emotional Problems (RE); Mental Health (MH), Physical Component Score (PCS); Mental Component Score (MCS). Baseline SF-36v1 Scores, where data available. Scores range 0-100, higher scores represent better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores for each of the 8 HRQoL/SF-36 health domain scores.

Physical Functioning (PF); Role Limitation Due to Physical Health (RP); Bodily Pain (BP); General Health (GH); Vitality (VT); Social Functioning (SF); Role Limitation Due to Emotional Problems (RE); Mental Health (MH), Physical Component Score (PCS); Mental Component Score (MCS). Baseline SF-36v1 Scores, where data available. Scores range 0-100, higher scores represent better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores for each of the 8 HRQoL/SF-36 health domain scores.

Differences in health domain scores = (End of on-demand treatment) - (End of prophylaxis regimen). A negative value for the median difference equates to a larger domain score for the prophylaxis regimen Physical Functioning (PF); Role Limitation Due to Physical Health (RP); Bodily Pain (BP); General Health (GH); Vitality (VT); Social Functioning (SF); Role Limitation Due to Emotional Problems (RE); Mental Health (MH), Physical Component Score (PCS); Mental Component Score (MCS). Scores range 0-100, higher scores represent better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores for each of the 8 HRQoL/SF-36 health domain scores.

Change = (End of on-demand treatment) - (End of prophylaxis regimen). A negative value for the median difference equates to a larger domain score for the prophylaxis regimen. Scores range 0-100, higher scores represent better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores.

Change = (End of on-demand treatment) - (End of prophylaxis regimen) A negative value for the median difference equates to a larger domain score for the prophylaxis regimen. Scores range 0-100, higher scores represent better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores.