State University of New York at Buffalo
Buffalo, New York, 14214, United States
NCT Number: NCT04334525
Restaurants are normative eating contexts for many families. Restaurant meals tend to be higher in calories and lower in nutritional quality than those prepared at home. Targeting children's food selection in restaurants has the potential to improve diet quality, attenuate excess energy intake, and shape healthy habits. The objective of this study is to make healthier kids' meal options more appealing and easier to choose via an in-restaurant intervention that combines repeated exposure and choice architecture strategies. Six locations of a quick-service restaurant will be paired based on income levels in the surrounding census tracts. A location from each pair will be randomized to each study group (intervention, control). Recruitment and data collection will be conducted across 3 cohorts, with recruitment conducted during a family's regular visit. Study participation will involve 7 more visits to the location where the family was recruited, 6 of which will be during an exposure period of about 2 months. Families in intervention restaurants will receive placemats promoting healthier featured kids' meals. Participating families will also receive a frequent diner card which, after purchasing one of the featured healthier kids' meals across 6 occasions, makes them eligible for a free kids' meal of their choice during a predetermined redemption period. In the control group, generic placemats will be provided, and participating families will be provided with frequent diner cards that can be used for any kids' meals. The aims of this study are: (1) to test effects of a healthier kids' meal intervention on children's meal orders, and (2) to test effects of a healthier kids' meal intervention on children's dietary intake. It is hypothesized that (1a) children in the intervention restaurants will be more likely than controls to select one of the promoted healthier kids' meals at post-test, (1b) children in the intervention group will order fewer calories and desserts and less saturated fat, sodium, and sugar at post-test versus controls, (1c) the promoted healthier meals will make up a greater percentage of kids' meals ordered in intervention restaurants versus controls, based on sales data across the study period, and (2) compared to controls, children in the intervention group will consume fewer calories and less saturated fat, sodium, and sugar in the restaurant at post-test.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me4 year–8 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Buffalo, New York, 14214, United States
Restaurants are normative eating contexts for many families. Restaurant meals tend to be higher in calories and lower in nutritional quality than those prepared at home. Targeting children's food selection in restaurants has the potential to improve diet quality, attenuate excess energy intake, and shape healthy habits. The objective of this study is to make healthier kids' meal options more appealing and easier to choose via an in-restaurant intervention that combines repeated exposure and choice architecture strategies.
Six locations of a quick-service restaurant will be paired based on income levels in the surrounding census tracts. A location from each pair will be randomized to each study group (intervention, control). Recruitment and data collection will be conducted across 3 cohorts. After recruitment, families will be asked to order and eat like they normally would. All participating families will then complete measures of children's orders, intake, and demographics. Then families will receive placemats and frequent diner cards. Families in intervention restaurants will receive placemats promoting healthier featured kids' meals. These families will also receive a frequent diner card, which after purchasing one of the featured healthier kids' meals across 6 occasions, makes them eligible for a free kids' meal of their choice during a predetermined redemption period. In the control group, generic placemats will be provided following baseline data collection, and families will also be provided with frequent diner cards that can be used for any kids' meals. During subsequent exposure periods, lasting about 2 months per cohort, families will return to the restaurant location where they were recruited on a weekly basis. Placemats will be available at the restaurant entrance, and corresponding signage will be displayed in the restaurant. In intervention restaurants, signs will advertise promoted meals and the option to select a toy in place of dessert. Participating children will be able to use their frequent diner card during this time to earn a free meal during the subsequent redemption period. Families will also be asked to complete a brief online survey once per week to monitor restaurant patronage. In each restaurant, study staff will conduct observations of a subsample of participating family and server interactions. Finally, post assessments will be completed during predetermined redemption periods, lasting about 3 months per cohort. Placemats and signage will still be available in restaurants during this time. Study staff will collect the frequent diner cards and ask families to order and eat like they normally would and to not throw out any food or leftovers. Families will be able to redeem any earned free kids' meals during this time. When the family is done eating, study staff will approach the table to administer study measures assessing orders, perspectives on the meal, and intake. Finally, families will also be prompted to complete an online dietary recall (ASA24) after their post assessment.
The specific aims of this study are: (1) to test effects of a healthier kids' meal intervention on children's meal orders, and (2) to test effects of a healthier kids' meal intervention on children's dietary intake. It is hypothesized that (1a) children in the intervention restaurants will be more likely than controls to select one of the promoted healthier kids' meals at post-test, (1b) children in the intervention group will order fewer calories and desserts and less saturated fat, sodium, and sugar at post-test versus controls, (1c) the promoted healthier meals will make up a greater percentage of kids' meals ordered in intervention restaurants versus controls, based on sales data across the study period, and (2) compared to controls, children in the intervention group will consume fewer calories and less saturated fat, sodium, and sugar in the restaurant at post-test.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants will receive placemats promoting healthier featured kids' meals and the opportunity to redeem their kids' meal token for a toy instead of dessert. Families will also receive a frequent diner card, which after purchasing one of the featured healthier kids' meals across 6 occasions, makes them eligible for a free kids' meal of their choice during a predetermined redemption period.
Participants receive generic placemats and frequent diner cards that do not promote any specific kids' meal.
Time frame: Post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Whether a healthier children's meal or other children's meal was ordered (bundled meal including promoted healthy main dish, healthy side, and healthy beverage). Counts reported indicate the number of children who ordered a healthy bundled meal.
Time frame: Baseline, midpoints 1-9 (weekly assessments about 2 months after recruitment), post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Whether a healthier children's meal or other children's meal was ordered. Counts reflect the raw change in number of participants ordering the bundled healthy meal from baseline to post-test, by group.
Time frame: Post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Nutrition information provided by the restaurant will be combined with parent report of children's orders to calculate total calories ordered
Time frame: Baseline, midpoints 1-9 (weekly assessments about 2 months after recruitment), post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Nutrition information provided by the restaurant will be combined with parent report of children's orders to calculate total calories ordered
Time frame: Post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Nutrition information provided by the restaurant will be combined with parent report of children's orders to calculate total saturated fat ordered.
Time frame: Baseline, midpoints 1-9 (weekly assessments about 2 months after recruitment), post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Nutrition information provided by the restaurant will be combined with parent report of children's orders to calculate total saturated fat ordered.
Time frame: Post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Nutrition information provided by the restaurant will be combined with parent report of children's orders to calculate total sugar ordered.
Time frame: Baseline, midpoints 1-9 (weekly assessments about 2 months after recruitment), post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Nutrition information provided by the restaurant will be combined with parent report of children's orders to calculate total sugar ordered.
Time frame: Post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Nutrition information provided by the restaurant will be combined with parent report of children's orders to calculate total sodium ordered.
Time frame: Baseline, midpoints 1-9 (weekly assessments about 2 months after recruitment), post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Nutrition information provided by the restaurant will be combined with parent report of children's orders to calculate total sodium ordered.
Time frame: Post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Whether or not a dessert was ordered. Counts below reflect the number of children ordering a dessert at post-test.
Time frame: Baseline, midpoints 1-9 (weekly assessments about 2 months after recruitment), post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Whether or not a dessert was ordered. Numbers below reflect change in likelihood of ordering dessert from baseline to post-test in the context of the generalized linear mixed model with all time points (baseline, midpoints 1-9, post-test).
Time frame: Post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Children's dietary intake will be measured using plate waste methodology. Grams consumed will be converted to percentages using total grams from pre-weights, and these percentages will be multiplied by the total calories in the full item to calculate calories consumed.
Time frame: Baseline, post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Children's dietary intake will be measured using plate waste methodology. Grams consumed will be converted to percentages using total grams from pre-weights, and these percentages will be multiplied by the total calories in the full item to calculate calories consumed.
Time frame: Post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Children's dietary intake will be measured using plate waste methodology. Grams consumed will be converted to percentages using total grams from pre-weights, and these percentages will be multiplied by the total saturated fat in the full item to calculate saturated fat consumed.
Time frame: Baseline, post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Children's dietary intake will be measured using plate waste methodology. Grams consumed will be converted to percentages using total grams from pre-weights, and these percentages will be multiplied by the total saturated fat in the full item to calculate saturated fat consumed.
Time frame: Post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Children's dietary intake will be measured using plate waste methodology. Grams consumed will be converted to percentages using total grams from pre-weights, and these percentages will be multiplied by the total sugar in the full item to calculate sugar consumed.
Time frame: Baseline, post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Children's dietary intake will be measured using plate waste methodology. Grams consumed will be converted to percentages using total grams from pre-weights, and these percentages will be multiplied by the total sugar in the full item to calculate sugar consumed.
Time frame: Post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Children's dietary intake will be measured using plate waste methodology. Grams consumed will be converted to percentages using total grams from pre-weights, and these percentages will be multiplied by the total sodium in the full item to calculate sodium consumed.
Time frame: Baseline, post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Children's dietary intake will be measured using plate waste methodology. Grams consumed will be converted to percentages using total grams from pre-weights, and these percentages will be multiplied by the total sodium in the full item to calculate sodium consumed.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 years
Aggregated sales data from the restaurant will be collected to monitor sales of healthier kids' meals across all patrons in Anderson's restaurants by study group during the study period. Children's orders were studied in aggregate; thus individual study participants were not studied here.
Time frame: Exposure period (lasting from about 2 to about 4 months after participant recruitment)
Aggregated sales data from the restaurant will be collected to monitor sales of healthier kids' meals across all patrons in Anderson's restaurants by study group during the exposure period. Given that the intervention experienced by the general population (as opposed to study participants) is the same during midpoints and post-test, note that here exposure refers to midpoints plus post-test as described in a priori published protocol paper. Children's orders were studied in aggregate; thus individual study participants were not studied here.
Time frame: Baseline
Aggregated sales data from the restaurant will be collected to monitor sales of healthier kids' meals across all patrons in Anderson's restaurants by study group during the baseline period. Only aggregate data were recorded here; no data for individual child participants are available.
Time frame: 1 and 2 years prior to study exposure period
Aggregated sales data from the restaurant will be collected to monitor sales of kids' meals across all patrons in Anderson's restaurants during time points parallel to the exposure period, 1 and 2 years prior to the study (for historical comparison). 2 years was added after original study planning but before study completion, given that 1 year prior to the study was 2020, a year impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Only aggregate data were recorded here (no individual participant data). Values from the two time points (1 year prior and 2 years prior) are summed.
Time frame: Post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Parents will report children's daily dietary intake using the Automated Self-administered 24-hour Dietary Assessment Tool (ASA24) the day after the in-restaurant part of the post-test assessment.
Time frame: Post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Parents will report children's daily dietary intake using the Automated Self-administered 24-hour Dietary Assessment Tool (ASA24) the day after the in-restaurant part of the post-test assessment.
Time frame: Post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Parents will report children's daily dietary intake using the Automated Self-administered 24-hour Dietary Assessment Tool (ASA24) the day after the in-restaurant part of the post-test assessment.
Time frame: Post-test (about 4 months after recruitment)
Parents will report children's daily dietary intake using the Automated Self-administered 24-hour Dietary Assessment Tool (ASA24) the day after the in-restaurant part of the post-test assessment.
State University of New York at Buffalo
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06550297
Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular Diseases
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05512247
Body Weight, Body Weight Changes
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06145009
Behavior, Behavior, Animal
Newark, Delaware, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04725630
Diabetes Complications, Diabetes Mellitus
Various Cities, Alberta, Canada
View Trial Details