Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07339904

ProLARS Trial: Prospective Longitudinal Follow-up of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) and COREFO Score After Rectum Surgery in Patients Undergoing Upfront Surgery or Different Neo-adjuvant Treatment Regimens

OBJECTIVE Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is a term for functional bowel complaints occurring after low anterior resection. Symptoms can range from faecal incontinence and frequent loose stools to urgency and incomplete emptying with great impact on quality of life. Little is known about the longitudinal evolution of LARS and the impact of different schedules of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with surgery.

The investigators aim to investigate the incidence and evolution of functional bowel complaints in function of different neoadjuvant treatment regimens, type of surgery and adjuvant therapy in patients who undergo surgery for rectal cancer. The investigators focus on following objectives: evolution of LARS- and COREFO-scores per treatment regimen and their impact on work incapacity; identification of possible risk factors potentially related to functional outcome; monitoring and treatment of LARS.

METHODS This will be a multicentre prospective interventional study. The study population will consist of adult patients with rectal cancer, regardless of any neo-adjuvant therapy. Patients will be included for 5 years with a 2 year postoperative follow-up. Interim analysis will be made after 2 years of inclusion. Patients with intellectual disability or clinical colon obstruction are excluded. Automated online questionnaires including LARS and COREFO scores, incapacity for work and defecation quality will be sent at different time points (figure 1) using REDCap.

RESULTS and CONCLUSIONS Longitudinal change of LARS- and COREFO-scores will be visually summarized. Patient, disease or procedure specific risk factors will be assessed as well.

LARS is proven to be the principal postoperative problem after rectal surgery. If the investigators can predict the severity of LARS (minor or major LARS), this can be extremely helpful in deciding whether to perform a sphincter-sparing resection or a rectal amputation instead. Furthermore, the investigators want to offer perspective to patients who are susceptible to a disturbed postoperative bowel function.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years or older.
  • Diagnosis of rectal cancer, discussed at the multidisciplinary consultation, with the intention to perform a sphincter preserving total mesorectal excision (TME) or partial mesorectal excision (PME), regardless of the need of neoadjuvant treatment.

Exclusion criteria

  • History of inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis) due to often persistent bowel complaints and therefore distorted baseline and follow-up data.
  • Dementia or intellectual disability.
  • Patients who are obstructive and in need a decompressive stoma or rectal stenting due to the lack of baseline data as they are often admitted to the hospital in an urgent setting

Treatment and study plan

Questionnaire

Other

Online questionnaire regarding LARS- and COREFO-scores, quality of defecation process, incapacity for work and initiation of treatment for potential LARS at different moments in time

Primary outcomes

  1. The evolution of the COREFO-score (Colorectal Functional Outcome questionnaire) at 2 years after rectal surgery compared to baseline (absolute difference) will be examined

    Time frame: 2 years from when rectal resection or stoma reversal was performed

    27 questions on 5-point Likert scale Higher score = worse bowel function

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evolution of LARS-score (low anterior resection syndrome) at 2 years after rectal surgery compared to baseline (absolute difference)

    Time frame: 2 years from when rectal resection or stoma reversal was performed

    0-20 = no LARS 21-29 = minor LARS 30-42 = major LARS

  2. The evolution of the LARS-score (low anterior resection syndrome) at 2 years after rectal surgery compared to baseline (relative difference) will be examined.

    Time frame: 2 years from when rectal resection or stoma reversal was performed

    0-20 = no LARS 21-29 = minor LARS 30-42 = major LARS

  3. The evolution of the COREFO-score (Colorectal Functional Outcome questionnaire) at 2 years after rectal surgery compared to baseline (relative difference) will be examined

    Time frame: 2 years from when rectal resection or stoma reversal was performed

    27 questions on 5-point Likert scale Higher score = worse bowel function (min 0 - max 100)

  4. The evolution of the LARS-score (low anterior resection syndrome) in the absence of baseline data will be examined as well (absolute difference), comparing 2-year outcome to earliest results.

    Time frame: 2 years from when rectal resection or stoma reversal was performed

    0-20 no LARS 21-29 minor LARS 30-42 major LARS (min 0 - max 42)

  5. The evolution of the LARS-score (low anterior resection syndrome) in the absence of baseline data will be examined as well (relative difference), comparing 2-year outcome to earliest results.

    Time frame: 2 years from when rectal resection or stoma reversal was performed

    0-20 no LARS 21-29 minor LARS 30-42 major LARS (min 0 - max 42)

  6. The evolution of the COREFO-score (Colorectal Functional Outcome questionnaire) in the absence of baseline data will be examined as well (absolute difference), comparing 2-year outcome to earliest results.

    Time frame: 2 years from when rectal resection or stoma reversal was performed

    27 questions on 5-point Likert scale Higher score = worse bowel function (min 0 - max 100)

  7. The evolution of the COREFO-score (Colorectal Functional Outcome questionnaire) in the absence of baseline data will be examined as well (relative difference), comparing 2-year outcome to earliest results.

    Time frame: 2 years from when rectal resection or stoma reversal was performed

    27 questions on 5-point Likert scale Higher score = worse bowel function (min 0 - max 100)

  8. LARS-score (low anterior resection syndrome) score at diagnosis

    Time frame: At diagnosis = baseline

    0-20 no LARS 21-29 minor LARS 30-42 major LARS (min 0 - max 42) LARS = low anterior resection syndrome Using a questionnaire Unit = mean score (0-42)

  9. COREFO-score at diagnosis (Colorectal Functional Outcome questionnaire)

    Time frame: At diagnosis = baseline

    27 questions on 5-point Likert scale Higher score = worse bowel function (min 0 - max 100) COREFO = Colorectal Functional Outcome questionnaire Using a questionnaire Unit = mean score (0-100)

  10. LARS-score (low anterior resection syndrome) after neo-adjuvant therapy

    Time frame: After neo-adjuvant therapy (up to 6 months from baseline)

    0-20 no LARS 21-29 minor LARS 30-42 major LARS (min 0 - max 42) LARS = low anterior resection syndrome Using a questionnaire Unit = mean score (0-42)

  11. COREFO-score after neo-adjuvant therapy (Colorectal Functional Outcome questionnaire)

    Time frame: After neo-adjuvant therapy (up to 6 months from baseline)

    27 questions on 5-point Likert scale Higher score = worse bowel function (min 0 - max 100) COREFO = Colorectal Functional Outcome questionnaire Using a questionnaire Unit = mean score (0-100)

  12. LARS-score (low anterior resection syndrome) shortly prior to surgery when there is a delay of 4 or more weeks after finishing neoadjuvant therapy

    Time frame: 2 days prior to surgery

    0-20 no LARS 21-29 minor LARS 30-42 major LARS (min 0 - max 42) LARS = low anterior resection syndrome Using a questionnaire Unit = mean score (0-42)

  13. COREFO-score (Colorectal Functional Outcome questionnaire) shortly prior to surgery when there is a delay of 4 or more weeks after finishing neoadjuvant therapy

    Time frame: 2 days prior to surgery

    27 questions on 5-point Likert scale Higher score = worse bowel function (min 0 - max 100) COREFO = Colorectal Functional Outcome questionnaire Using a questionnaire Unit = mean score (0-100)

  14. LARS-scores (low anterior resection syndrome) postoperatively after 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years

    Time frame: Postoperatively after 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years

    0-20 no LARS 21-29 minor LARS 30-42 major LARS (min 0 - max 42) LARS = low anterior resection syndrome Using a questionnaire Unit = mean score (0-42)

  15. COREFO-scores (Colorectal Functional Outcome questionnaire) postoperatively after 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years

    Time frame: Postoperatively after 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years

    27 questions on 5-point Likert scale Higher score = worse bowel function (min 0 - max 100) COREFO = Colorectal Functional Outcome questionnaire Using a questionnaire Unit = mean score (0-100)

  16. Evolution of quality of defecation process

    Time frame: 2 years after rectal resection or stoma reversal

    Visual analogue scale 0-10 0 = worst defecation ever 10 = best defecation ever

  17. Incapacity for work

    Time frame: At diagnose (baseline), 2 days after radiotherapy, 1 week after chemotherapy and 1 month after rectal resection

    Time (days) between date of start work incapacity and date back to work (if not yet retired)

  18. Initiation of treatment for potential LARS (low anterior resection syndrome) during follow-up

    Time frame: Up to 2 years after rectal resection

    Yes/no:

    • Dietary measures
    • Medication (probiotics, antidiarrheals, ...)
    • Pelvic floor physiotherapy
    • Transanal irrigation, rectal irrigation, enema
    • Neuromodulation (neurostimulator)
    • Other

    Calculating proportion of patients who received treatment for LARS

Other outcomes

  1. Gender

    Time frame: Baseline

    Male, female, other

  2. Year of birth

    Time frame: Baseline

    Year of birth

  3. Age

    Time frame: Baseline to date of surgery

    Age at diagnosis and at surgery

  4. Hospital admission data

    Time frame: After rectal resection

    Length of stay in days (date of admission for rectal resection until date of dismission)

  5. Medical history

    Time frame: Baseline

    Smoking, diabetes mellitus, abdominal, cardiac, pulmonary (yes/no)

  6. Anthropometry

    Time frame: Baseline

    Body mass index (kg/m²)

  7. Tumor location

    Time frame: After restaging prior to surgery

    Distance in cm from recto-anal angle, based on MRI

  8. Presence of lateral lymph nodes

    Time frame: After restaging prior to surgery

    Presence of lateral lymph nodes (yes/no)

  9. cTNM

    Time frame: After restaging prior to surgery

    Clinical TNM classification of tumor:

    • T: tumor size
    • N: nodal involvement
    • M: metastasis
  10. Percentage of rectal circumference involved

    Time frame: After restaging prior to surgery

    Percentage of rectal circumference involved: on imaging (CT/MRI), coloscopy or ultrasound-endoscopy

  11. Circumferential resection margin

    Time frame: After restaging prior to surgery

    Circumferential resection margin (CRM; on MRI; measured from gland; in mm)

  12. Neoadjuvant therapy

    Time frame: From baseline to surgery

    The eventual use of neoadjuvant therapy: radiotherapy (RT), chemotherapy (CT) (yes/no)

  13. Radiotherapy dose

    Time frame: From baseline to surgery

    Radiotherapy dose (Gy)

  14. Chemotherapy type and frequency

    Time frame: From baseline to surgery

    Certain type of chemotherapy, used for certain amount of cycles

  15. Surgical approach

    Time frame: At surgery

    Surgical approach:

    • Open
    • Laparoscopy
    • Robot
    • Transanal (TaTME)
  16. Configuration of anastomosis

    Time frame: At surgery

    Configuration of colorectal/coloanal anastomosis:

    • End-to-End
    • Side-to-End
    • End-to-Side
    • Side-to-Side
  17. Manual or stapled anastomosis

    Time frame: At surgery

    Manual or stapled anastomosis

  18. Conversion

    Time frame: At surgery

    Conversion during surgery:

    • Robot to laparoscopy (yes/no)
    • Laparoscopy to open (yes/no)
  19. Diverting ileostomy

    Time frame: At surgery

    Use of a diverting ileostomy (yes/no)

  20. Baseline CEA

    Time frame: At baseline

    Baseline CEA: Carcinoembryonic antigen (µg/L)

  21. Histology type

    Time frame: After surgery

    Histology type of tumor (adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, neuro-endocrine tumor etc.)

  22. Tumor differentiation

    Time frame: After surgery

    Well differentiated Moderately differentiated poorly differentiated

  23. Tumor perforation

    Time frame: After surgery

    Tumor perforation on histology (yes/no)

  24. Radical resection

    Time frame: After surgery

    Radical resection: R0, R1, R2

  25. pTNM

    Time frame: After surgery

    Pathological TNM classification of tumor

    • T: tumor size
    • N: nodal involvement
    • M: metastasis
  26. Disease free interval

    Time frame: Up to 2 years after rectal resection

    Disease free interval: the period of time between the primary treatment of a malignancy and the first sign of tumor recurrence (in months)

  27. Type of complication

    Time frame: After rectal resection during admission

    Type of complication:

    • Urinary tract infection
    • Pulmonary complications
    • Surgical site infection
    • Intra-abdominal collections/abscess
    • Eventration/evisceration
    • Ileus
    • Small bowel obstruction
    • Anastomotic leakage
    • Deep venous thrombosis
    • Postoperative bleeding
    • Acute renal failure
    • High output ileostomy
    • Other stoma related complications
    • Other (yes/no)
  28. Early complications

    Time frame: Between surgery and 30 days after surgery

    Early complications: before 30 days after surgery

  29. Late complications

    Time frame: From 30 days after surgery up to 2 years after surgery

    Late complications: more than 30 days after surgery

  30. Anastomotic leakage

    Time frame: Up to 3 months after surgery

    Definition of anastomotic leakage:

    • Clinically manifest insufficiency of the anastomosis leading to a clinical state requiring treatment, diagnosed in accordance with surgical practice guidelines by a senior surgeon (no additional or systematic routine iconography nor colonoscopy)
    • Radiological evidence of anastomotic leakage if the patient is clinically symptomatic. Fistulas communicating with the anastomosis on CT scan are classified as AL together with presacral abscesses if extravasation of the colonic contrast is visible on radiological imaging (ref. SAFE 2019 Clinical Investigation Plan)

    (yes/no)

  31. Clavien-Dindo classification

    Time frame: After admission for rectal resection

    Clavien-Dindo classification (grade 0, I, II, IIIa, IIIb, IVa, IVb, V):

    Grade I:

    Minor deviation from normal course; no drugs or interventions needed (only supportive care).

    Grade II:

    Requires pharmacological treatment (e.g. antibiotics, blood transfusion, TPN).

    Grade III:

    Requires surgical, endoscopic, or radiological intervention IIIa: without general anesthesia IIIb: with general anesthesia

    Grade IV:

    Life-threatening complication requiring ICU care IVa: single-organ dysfunction IVb: multi-organ dysfunction

    Grade V:

    Death

  32. CCI-score

    Time frame: After admission for rectal resection

    CCI-score: comprehensive complication index (score from 0-100 calculated with online calculator: https://www.cci-calculator.com/cci-calculator)

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Juul Meurs, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+32476617623

Niels Komen, MD PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+32 3 821 30 00

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Antwerp

Other

Registry information

Acronym: ProLARS

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2029
Study completion
2029
First posted
Jan 14, 2026
Registry last updated
Jan 14, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.