Biospecimen Collection
ProcedureUndergo collection of blood samples
NCT Number: NCT07143487
This clinical trial compares patient (proband)-mediated communication to provider-mediated communication for improving genetic testing in first-degree relatives of patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer. It is estimated that 30% of cases of colorectal cancer have a genetic basis and about 15% of these patients have a disease-causing (pathogenic) inherited (germline) variant in a cancer susceptibility gene. Most individuals carrying a pathogenic germline variant are unaware of their cancer risk and may not meet guidelines for genetic testing. Identifying pathogenic germline variants or hereditary cancer syndromes in cancer patients has important implications for their at-risk relatives who may not know that they are at high risk for cancer. The burden of communicating this risk to first-degree relatives often falls on the patients, who may lack sufficient knowledge to correctly share and explain their genetic test results. Receiving provider-mediated communication of genetic testing results may be more effective at communicating genetic risk to first-degree relatives than the usual practice of proband-mediated communication.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Alaska Breast Care and Surgery LLC, Anchorage, Alaska, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare the proportion of first-degree relatives (FDRs) of probands with Lynch Syndrome who undergo germline testing in the provider-mediated arm (Arm B) versus the proband-mediated (Arm A) at 6 months.
II. To compare the proportion of FDRs of proband with a non-Lynch pathogenic germline variant who undergo germline testing in the provider-mediated arm (Arm B) versus the proband-mediated arm (Arm A) at 6 months.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To compare the proportion of FDRs with a pathogenic germline variant (PGV) who underwent disease prevention efforts at 12 months between the provider-mediated arm (Arm B) and the proband-mediated cascade testing arm (Arm A).
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. To assess differences in percentages of cascade genetic testing within the following proband subgroups: race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic whites; other race/ethnicities), sex (females; males), age (>= 50; < 50), tumor location (colon; rectal), tumor stage (stage I-II; stage III-IV), geographic location (urban; rural), and receipt of medical care in an academic versus (vs.) community setting.
III. To determine the prevalence and spectrum of pathogenic germline variants in cancer susceptibility genes by analysis of results of upfront germline testing in a multi-site cancer cooperative group study population with newly diagnosed CRC.
IV. Assess the pattern of accrual of demographic patient subgroups including racial/ethnic minority and rural individuals at the initial 50% of accrual enrolled and at the end of the trial.
V. To compare disease-free survival (DFS) of the proband at 3 years between the direct-contact arm (Arm B) and the proband-directed cascade testing arm (Arm A).
V. To evaluate the completion rate of a Social Determinants of Health questionnaire with patient directed questions .
OUTLINE:
STEP 1: Patients (probands) undergo collection of blood samples and genetic testing on study.
STEP 2: Probands with pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants and their FDRs are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM A: FDRs receive proband-mediated communication about the proband's genetic testing results.
ARM B: FDRs receive provider-mediated communication about the proband's genetic testing results.
Probands are followed for up to 3 years and FDRs are followed for up to 1 year
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
-
Undergo collection of blood samples
Undergo genetic testing
Receive proband-mediated communication
Ancillary studies
Time frame: Within 6 months of proband randomization
This is a binary outcome. To test for a between-arm difference in the proportion of eligible FDRs receiving genetic testing, the primary analysis will apply a mixed-effects logistic regression model to account for between-family variability or equivalently the within family correlation. The mixed-effects logistic regression model will be applied separately within the subset of families who are associated with a proband who has Lynch syndrome (LS), and within the subset of families who are associated with a proband who harbors non-LS pathogenic germline variants (PGVs).
Time frame: Within 12 months of proband randomization
Binary outcome indicating whether an eligible FDR with a PGV who underwent disease prevention efforts at 12 months between the provider-mediated arm (Arm B) and the proband-mediated cascade testing arm (Arm A).
Time frame: Within 6 months of proband randomization
Will repeat LS and non-LS analyses according to pre-defined proband sub-groups (Non-Hispanic White vs. other races/ethnicities; female vs. male; age >= 50 vs. < 50; urban vs. rural; academic setting vs. community setting). It is clinically important to quantify the effect of the provider-mediated direct-contact approach within these subgroups and the degree of imprecision as measured by the corresponding confidence interval. Thus, we will report the odds ratio and descriptive 95% confidence interval.
Time frame: up to 3 years
Will estimate the proportion of cases where the germline mutation is detected by somatic next generation sequencing testing of the tumor. The corresponding lower bound of the one-sided 90% interval will be calculated for the true but unknown proportion.
Time frame: Up to 3 years
For each, descriptive statistics will include the frequency and percentage as well as the standard error.
Time frame: From the date the patient is randomized on study for first documentation of primary tumor recurrence/relapse or death, assessed up to 3 years
: DFS will be compared between direct-contact arm and proband-directed cascade testing arm. DFS percentages, standard errors, and the intervention effect comparison will be obtained from the Kaplan-Meier method, Greenwood's formula, and log-rank tests, respectively. Cox proportional hazards regression models will be used to estimate relative risks and 95% confidence intervals for the intervention comparison.
Time frame: up to 3 years
Summary of participant accrual over time, including recruitment rates by site and arm.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
Other
Evaluation of Provider vs. Patient Mediated Cascade Genetic Testing of First-Degree Relatives of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Colorectal Cancer
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03436563
Colon Adenocarcinoma, Colonic Diseases
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04963283
Colon Adenocarcinoma, Colon Cancer
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02863107
Colon Adenocarcinoma, Colonic Diseases
Conroe, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05746195
Colon Adenocarcinoma, Colonic Diseases
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial Details