Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04127357

Progression of Active Microcavitated Carious Lesions on Primary Molar Occlusal Surfaces

Objective: To verify the progression of active microcavitated carious lesions on occlusal surfaces of primary molars after the orientation of the brushing technique associated with fluoride dentifrice compared to resin sealant, through a 12-month randomized clinical trial. Methodology: We selected 22 children from 4 to 9 years old from the public school system of the city of Juazeiro do Norte-Ceará, with at least one primary molar presenting an active caries lesion score 3 of the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS). Randomization was performed en bloc and stratified by two conditions (age and caries experience). The selected teeth were divided into two groups: the first (G1) was submitted to brushing with fluoridated toothpaste; and the other group (G2) to the resin sealing technique, whose application of the material was performed under absolute or relative isolation, selected through a second randomization. The molars undergoing treatment were evaluated at 6- and 12-month returns. Caries progression was evaluated according to the type of treatment, dental group and sealant retention by the Chi-square test. For cost analysis, the variance test (ANOVA) was used.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Dental Caries in Children Pit and Fissure Sealant Toothbrushing Van der Woude syndrome

Age range

4 year–9 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • At least one primary molar with active caries lesions classified as ICDAS score 3.

Exclusion criteria

  • Children with differentiated management needs and/or systemic diseases with oral involvement.
  • Primary molar with active caries lesions classified as ICDAS score 3 that had other caries lesions involving dentin, restorations, sealants, or other types of formation defects.

Treatment and study plan

1450 ppm fluoride toothpaste brushing x Resin sealing (FluroShield, Dentsply, Brazil).

Procedure

After randomization of the children, the selected molars were allocated through a randomized sequence list in 2 groups: A. Brushing with 1450 ppm fluoride toothpaste, donated by the researcher; B. Resin Sealing (FluroShield, Dentsply, Brazil).

The teeth included in the second group (group B) underwent a second randomization: B1. With absolute isolation; B2. With relative isolation. For the group with absolute isolation, topical anesthesia and local papillary infiltration were performed for subsequent staple placement. Relative isolation was performed with cotton rollers and moisture control suction. The sealant selected was the opaque fluroshield to facilitate visualization upon visual examination during reevaluations and was applied following the manufacturer's standards. The teeth were clinically and radiographically followed at 6 and 12 months and two sessions of motivation reinforcement were performed through video and brush change at 3 and 9 months.

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical evaluation of caries progression

    Time frame: 6 months

    With the radiographs in hand, the possible progression of the treated caries lesion was observed, which was coded as: a) Absent progression: no radiolucent area of the lesion; b) Present progression: with increase in the radiolucent area of the lesion.

  2. Clinical evaluation of caries progression

    Time frame: 12 months

    With the radiographs in hand, the possible progression of the treated caries lesion was observed, which was coded as: a) Absent progression: no radiolucent area of the lesion; b) Present progression: with increase in the radiolucent area of the lesion.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sealant retention

    Time frame: 6 months

    Clinical evaluation of sealant retention was performed using the criteria used by Pardi: RT- total retention, PP1- presence of sealant on two thirds of the occlusal surface, PP2- presence of sealant on one third of the occlusal surface. PT-total loss of sealant on occlusal surface.

  2. Sealant retention

    Time frame: 12 months

    Clinical evaluation of sealant retention was performed using the criteria used by Pardi: RT- total retention, PP1- presence of sealant on two thirds of the occlusal surface, PP2- presence of sealant on one third of the occlusal surface. PT-total loss of sealant on occlusal surface.

Other outcomes

  1. Direct cost estimate

    Time frame: 6 months

    To estimate costs, the sessions were timed (initial and reevaluations) and for each consultation a table was filled in, which should contain the quantities of materials used per session. Prices of materials were considered by inferring the market value obtained by an average of 3 (three) different places that market the products in question, thus obtaining different costs for the proposed treatments.

  2. Direct cost estimate

    Time frame: 12 months

    To estimate costs, the sessions were timed (initial and reevaluations) and for each consultation a table was filled in, which should contain the quantities of materials used per session. Prices of materials were considered by inferring the market value obtained by an average of 3 (three) different places that market the products in question, thus obtaining different costs for the proposed treatments.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Faculty Sao Leopoldo Mandic Campinas

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Progression of Active Microcavitated Carious Lesions on Primary Teeth Occlusal Surfaces: Randomize Clinical Trial

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2019
First posted
Oct 15, 2019
Registry last updated
Oct 15, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.