Orsi Academy
Melle, 9090, Belgium
NCT Number: NCT07180797
Feasibility study
1. To evaluate the feasibility of PBP training for nerve-sparing RARP on the Hugo Ras system 2. To assess time to proficiency for participants with varying experience 3. To identify challenges in PBP RARP training through observed errors and feedback
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Melle, 9090, Belgium
As robotic surgery advances, the emergence of new platforms such as the Hugo™ Robotic-Assisted Surgery System calls for robust training frameworks. Proficiency-Based Progression (PBP) provides a structured method to ensure skill acquisition through clearly defined, measurable benchmarks. This study evaluates the feasibility of implementing a PBP curriculum to train urologists in nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) using the Hugo™ system.
Twelve urologists and urology residents will participate, divided into three groups based on experience:
Robotic-naïve Intermediate (Da Vinci experience only) Expert RARP surgeons (Da Vinci experience without prior Hugo exposure)
The PBP training pathway comprises:
Cognitive modules (e-learning with MCQ validation) Psychomotor skills training (device familiarization and basic surgical skills) Procedural training (nerve-sparing RARP on porcine models)
Performance will be evaluated both in real time and via blinded video review.
Primary endpoints include the time to reach proficiency in basic skills and procedural steps, analyzed by prior experience. Secondary endpoints encompass error profiles, participant and instructor feedback, and the feasibility of standardizing proficiency metrics.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Prior experience with the Hugo robotic system. Participants unable to attend all training days. Non-urology residents or consultants
Time frame: 9 months
Time frame: 9 months
Identification of challenging steps/phases in the PBP RARP procedure based on:
Number of errors committed Feedback from trainers Participant feedback on the training process (structured questionnaire)
Orsi Academy
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07737379
Football Players, Training Effectiveness
Katowice, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT06964139
Learning Curve, Surgery
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07074301
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
View Trial DetailsNCT06727500
Body Weight, Nutrition Disorders
Santiago, Chile
View Trial Details