Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Enrolling by Invitation

NCT Number: NCT07180797

Proficiency-Based Progression on Hugo Ras Robot for Learning Nerve-Sparing RARP: Feasibility Study

Feasibility study

1. To evaluate the feasibility of PBP training for nerve-sparing RARP on the Hugo Ras system 2. To assess time to proficiency for participants with varying experience 3. To identify challenges in PBP RARP training through observed errors and feedback

Enrolling by Invitation

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Orsi Academy

Melle, 9090, Belgium

About this study

As robotic surgery advances, the emergence of new platforms such as the Hugo™ Robotic-Assisted Surgery System calls for robust training frameworks. Proficiency-Based Progression (PBP) provides a structured method to ensure skill acquisition through clearly defined, measurable benchmarks. This study evaluates the feasibility of implementing a PBP curriculum to train urologists in nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) using the Hugo™ system.

Twelve urologists and urology residents will participate, divided into three groups based on experience:

Robotic-naïve Intermediate (Da Vinci experience only) Expert RARP surgeons (Da Vinci experience without prior Hugo exposure)

The PBP training pathway comprises:

Cognitive modules (e-learning with MCQ validation) Psychomotor skills training (device familiarization and basic surgical skills) Procedural training (nerve-sparing RARP on porcine models)

Performance will be evaluated both in real time and via blinded video review.

Primary endpoints include the time to reach proficiency in basic skills and procedural steps, analyzed by prior experience. Secondary endpoints encompass error profiles, participant and instructor feedback, and the feasibility of standardizing proficiency metrics.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • We'll only include urologist or urology residents to ensure that they have all the same interest and area of expertise

Exclusion criteria

Prior experience with the Hugo robotic system. Participants unable to attend all training days. Non-urology residents or consultants

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. time-to-proficiency for basic skills and procedural steps

    Time frame: 9 months

    • Time taken to achieve proficiency in basic robotic skills on the Hugo system.
    • Time taken to achieve proficiency in RARP using the Hugo system in the simulated setting.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Error patterns and feasibility of PBP RARP training on the Hugo system

    Time frame: 9 months

    Identification of challenging steps/phases in the PBP RARP procedure based on:

    Number of errors committed Feedback from trainers Participant feedback on the training process (structured questionnaire)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Orsi Academy

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Sep 18, 2025
Registry last updated
Sep 18, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.