Colostomy with mesh implantation
ProcedureColostomy with mesh implantation
NCT Number: NCT01380860
The purpose of this study is to compare rates of hernia formation between colostomies created with no hernia preventing mesh versus colostomies created with a particular mesh.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
CHRU de Besancon, Besançon, France
Previous studies indicate that implanting mesh for peristomal hernia repair may efficiently prevent hernia relapse. However, mesh provides a good infection site, which is not a desirable characteristic for a material adjacent to a colostomy "port". Our goal is to implement a high-quality, randomized trial to demonstrate whether or not systematic mesh implantation upon primary hernia creation is an effective means of avoiding this common and troublesome complication.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Colostomy with mesh implantation
Colostomy with no mesh implantation.
Time frame: 24 months
The occurrence of peristomal hernias is determined in both groups every three months up until 24 months. The presence of absence of a hernia is detected by clinical exam, and at 24 months by an additional radiology exam. The primary outcome concerns rates at 24 months, primo-events only.
Time frame: 12 months
The presence of absence of a hernia is detected by clinical exam.
Time frame: 1 month
The number of days spent in the hospital after the surgical intervention.
Time frame: Day 1
Time frame: Day 1
Time frame: 24 months
Time frame: 24 months
Time frame: 24 months
Complications include: retraction, stenosis, prolapse, disunion, necrosis, abcess, infections, occlusion, strangulation, perforation, eczema, dermatitis, erythema, ulceration
Time frame: 24 months
A visual analog scale is used to determine how difficult it is for a patient to fit his/her colostomy with an appropriate device. 0: perfect adhesion; 10: the device does not adjust to the shape of my skin, and I have permanent leakage.
Time frame: 24 months
A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of pain around the stomy site.
Time frame: 24 months
A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of abdominal pain.
Time frame: 24 months
Time frame: 24 months
Time frame: 24 months
Time frame: 24 months
Time frame: 24 months
Validated assessment of quality of life.
Time frame: 24 months
Time frame: 12 months
Validated assessment of quality of life.
Time frame: 1 month
Validated assessment of quality of life.
Time frame: Day 1
Time frame: Day 1
A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of pain around the stomy site.
Time frame: 1 month
A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of pain around the stomy site.
Time frame: 3 months
A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of pain around the stomy site.
Time frame: 6 months
A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of pain around the stomy site.
Time frame: 9 months
A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of pain around the stomy site.
Time frame: 12 months
A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of pain around the stomy site.
Time frame: 15 months
A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of pain around the stomy site.
Time frame: 18 months
A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of pain around the stomy site.
Time frame: 21 months
A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of pain around the stomy site.
Time frame: Day 1
A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of abdominal pain.
Time frame: 1 month
A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of abdominal pain.
Time frame: 3 months
A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of abdominal pain.
Time frame: 6 months
A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of abdominal pain.
Time frame: 9 months
A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of abdominal pain.
Time frame: 12 months
A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of abdominal pain.
Time frame: 15 months
A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of abdominal pain.
Time frame: 18 months
A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of abdominal pain.
Time frame: 21 months
A visual analog scale is used to assess the patient's perception of abdominal pain.
Time frame: 1 month
The presence of absence of a hernia is detected by clinical exam.
Time frame: 3 months
The presence of absence of a hernia is detected by clinical exam.
Time frame: 6 months
The presence of absence of a hernia is detected by clinical exam.
Time frame: 9 months
The presence of absence of a hernia is detected by clinical exam.
Time frame: 15 months
The presence of absence of a hernia is detected by clinical exam.
Time frame: 18 months
The presence of absence of a hernia is detected by clinical exam.
Time frame: 21 months
The presence of absence of a hernia is detected by clinical exam.
Time frame: 1 month
Complications include: retraction, stenosis, prolapse, disunion, necrosis, abcess, infections, occlusion, strangulation, perforation, eczema, dermatitis, erythema, ulceration
Time frame: 3 months
Complications include: retraction, stenosis, prolapse, disunion, necrosis, abcess, infections, occlusion, strangulation, perforation, eczema, dermatitis, erythema, ulceration
Time frame: 6 months
Complications include: retraction, stenosis, prolapse, disunion, necrosis, abcess, infections, occlusion, strangulation, perforation, eczema, dermatitis, erythema, ulceration
Time frame: 9 months
Complications include: retraction, stenosis, prolapse, disunion, necrosis, abcess, infections, occlusion, strangulation, perforation, eczema, dermatitis, erythema, ulceration
Time frame: 12 months
Complications include: retraction, stenosis, prolapse, disunion, necrosis, abcess, infections, occlusion, strangulation, perforation, eczema, dermatitis, erythema, ulceration
Time frame: 15 months
Complications include: retraction, stenosis, prolapse, disunion, necrosis, abcess, infections, occlusion, strangulation, perforation, eczema, dermatitis, erythema, ulceration
Time frame: 18 months
Complications include: retraction, stenosis, prolapse, disunion, necrosis, abcess, infections, occlusion, strangulation, perforation, eczema, dermatitis, erythema, ulceration
Time frame: 21 months
Complications include: retraction, stenosis, prolapse, disunion, necrosis, abcess, infections, occlusion, strangulation, perforation, eczema, dermatitis, erythema, ulceration
Time frame: Day 1
A visual analog scale is used to determine how difficult it is for a patient to fit his/her colostomy with an appropriate device. 0: perfect adhesion; 10: the device does not adjust to the shape of my skin, and I have permanent leakage.
Time frame: 1 month
A visual analog scale is used to determine how difficult it is for a patient to fit his/her colostomy with an appropriate device. 0: perfect adhesion; 10: the device does not adjust to the shape of my skin, and I have permanent leakage.
Time frame: 3 months
A visual analog scale is used to determine how difficult it is for a patient to fit his/her colostomy with an appropriate device. 0: perfect adhesion; 10: the device does not adjust to the shape of my skin, and I have permanent leakage.
Time frame: 6 months
A visual analog scale is used to determine how difficult it is for a patient to fit his/her colostomy with an appropriate device. 0: perfect adhesion; 10: the device does not adjust to the shape of my skin, and I have permanent leakage.
Time frame: 9 months
A visual analog scale is used to determine how difficult it is for a patient to fit his/her colostomy with an appropriate device. 0: perfect adhesion; 10: the device does not adjust to the shape of my skin, and I have permanent leakage.
Time frame: 12 months
A visual analog scale is used to determine how difficult it is for a patient to fit his/her colostomy with an appropriate device. 0: perfect adhesion; 10: the device does not adjust to the shape of my skin, and I have permanent leakage.
Time frame: 15 months
A visual analog scale is used to determine how difficult it is for a patient to fit his/her colostomy with an appropriate device. 0: perfect adhesion; 10: the device does not adjust to the shape of my skin, and I have permanent leakage.
Time frame: 18 months
A visual analog scale is used to determine how difficult it is for a patient to fit his/her colostomy with an appropriate device. 0: perfect adhesion; 10: the device does not adjust to the shape of my skin, and I have permanent leakage.
Time frame: 21 months
A visual analog scale is used to determine how difficult it is for a patient to fit his/her colostomy with an appropriate device. 0: perfect adhesion; 10: the device does not adjust to the shape of my skin, and I have permanent leakage.
Time frame: Day 1
Time frame: 1 month
Time frame: 3 months
Time frame: 6 months
Time frame: 9 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 15 months
Time frame: 18 months
Time frame: 21 months
Time frame: Day 1
Time frame: 1 month
Time frame: 3 months
Time frame: 6 months
Time frame: 9 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 18 months
Time frame: 15 months
Time frame: 21 months
Time frame: Day 1
Time frame: 1 month
Time frame: 3 months
Time frame: 6 months
Time frame: 9 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 15 months
Time frame: 18 months
Time frame: 21 months
Time frame: Day 1
Time frame: 1 month
Time frame: 3 months
Time frame: 6 months
Time frame: 9 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 15 months
Time frame: 18 months
Time frame: 21 months
Time frame: 1 month
Time frame: 3 months
Time frame: 6 months
Time frame: 9 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 15 months
Time frame: 18 months
Time frame: 21 months
Time frame: 1 month
Time frame: 3 months
Time frame: 6 months
Time frame: 9 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 15 months
Time frame: 18 months
Time frame: 21 months
Time frame: 24 months
Time frame: 1 month
Time frame: 3 months
Time frame: 6 months
Time frame: 9 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 15 months
Time frame: 18 months
Time frame: 21 months
Time frame: 24 months
Time frame: Day 1
The evaluating clinician (blind to the procedure) will evaluate the healing progress of the colostomy using a visual analog scale.
Time frame: 1 month
The evaluating clinician (blind to the procedure) will evaluate the healing progress of the colostomy using a visual analog scale.
Time frame: 3 months
The evaluating clinician (blind to the procedure) will evaluate the healing progress of the colostomy using a visual analog scale.
Time frame: 6 months
The evaluating clinician (blind to the procedure) will evaluate the healing progress of the colostomy using a visual analog scale.
Time frame: 9 months
The evaluating clinician (blind to the procedure) will evaluate the healing progress of the colostomy using a visual analog scale.
Time frame: 12 months
The evaluating clinician (blind to the procedure) will evaluate the healing progress of the colostomy using a visual analog scale.
Time frame: 15 months
The evaluating clinician (blind to the procedure) will evaluate the healing progress of the colostomy using a visual analog scale.
Time frame: 18 months
The evaluating clinician (blind to the procedure) will evaluate the healing progress of the colostomy using a visual analog scale.
Time frame: 21 months
The evaluating clinician (blind to the procedure) will evaluate the healing progress of the colostomy using a visual analog scale.
Time frame: 24 months
The evaluating clinician (blind to the procedure) will evaluate the healing progress of the colostomy using a visual analog scale.
Time frame: 10 days
Time frame: Day 1
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Other
Primary Prevention of Peristomial Hernias Via Parietal Prostheses: a Randomized, Multicentric Study
Acronym: GRECCAR 07
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07064694
Hernia, Parastomal Hernia
Warsaw, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT06791642
Hernia, Parastomal Hernia
Naples, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT03702478
Hernia, Parastomal Hernia
Copenhagen, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT00908661
Hernia, Parastomal Hernia
Barcelona, Spain
View Trial Details