francesco Pizza
Naples, Italy, 80131
NCT Number: NCT06791642
This study focuses on improving the surgical repair of parastomal hernias (PSHs), which are a common complication for patients with stomas. The investigators are examining the effectiveness of a specific technique called the "sandwich method," which uses two layers of mesh to reinforce the hernia site and reduce recurrence. The objective is to evaluate how well this method works over time, assess its impact on patient recovery and quality of life, and compare outcomes for different types of surgical materials used. This research aims to provide clearer guidance for surgeons and improve long-term results for patients undergoing PSH repair.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Naples, Italy, 80131
Study Description: Improving Surgical Outcomes for Parastomal Hernia Repair
Parastomal hernias (PSHs) are a common and challenging complication that occurs in patients with stomas-surgically created openings in the abdomen used to divert waste. These hernias can cause discomfort, limit daily activities, and require surgical intervention to repair. Despite advancements in surgical techniques, PSH repair remains a complex issue, with high recurrence rates and varying outcomes.
This study investigates the effectiveness of a specific surgical approach called the "sandwich technique" for PSH repair. This method uses two layers of mesh to reinforce the abdominal wall and provide extra support around the stoma, aiming to reduce the likelihood of hernia recurrence while maintaining the function of the stoma. The first layer of mesh is placed directly around the stoma in a "keyhole" fashion, and the second layer reinforces the surrounding abdominal wall in a broader "overlay" configuration.
The research evaluates multiple aspects of this technique:
The study incorporates the European Hernia Society (EHS) classification system to categorize hernia types based on size and complexity. This allows for a tailored approach to treatment and helps identify which patients may benefit most from specific surgical strategies.
While the sandwich technique has shown promise in reducing recurrence rates and enhancing recovery, this research seeks to provide stronger evidence to guide surgeons in selecting the best techniques and materials for PSH repair. By focusing on patient-centered outcomes and refining surgical methods, the study aims to improve long-term results and overall quality of life for individuals living with stomas.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Age below 18 years.
The sandwich technique was performed laparoscopically according to minimally invasive principles. Pneumoperitoneum was typically established using a Veress needle if the subcostal region was free from previous surgical scarring. For patients with prior extensive abdominal surgeries, a small laparotomy was performed to place the first 10-mm trocar directly under vision, ensuring safe entry into the peritoneal cavity. A 30° laparoscope was used throughout the procedure for enhanced visualization of the operative field.
Trocar placement was designed to optimize access and ergonomics. The primary trocar was placed either in the periumbilical region or in the left or right flank, depending on the patient's anatomy and stoma location. Mesh used:1. Parietex™ Composite Mesh (Medtronic, USA): A multifilament polyester mesh with an anti-adhesive collagen barrier to minimize visceral adhesions.
Time frame: 12 months
defined as clinical or radiological confirmation of a recurrent parastomal hernia.
Time frame: 24 months
defined as clinical or radiological confirmation of a recurrent parastomal hernia.
Time frame: 1 months
The occurrence of surgical site infections was assessed as a critical indicator of postoperative morbidity. SSIs were monitored through clinical evaluations, including signs of redness, swelling, warmth, pain, and discharge at the surgical site, and were managed according to established guidelines.
Time frame: 3 months
The occurrence of surgical site infections was assessed as a critical indicator of postoperative morbidity. SSIs were monitored through clinical evaluations, including signs of redness, swelling, warmth, pain, and discharge at the surgical site, and were managed according to established guidelines.
Time frame: 6 months
The occurrence of surgical site infections was assessed as a critical indicator of postoperative morbidity. SSIs were monitored through clinical evaluations, including signs of redness, swelling, warmth, pain, and discharge at the surgical site, and were managed according to established guidelines.
Time frame: 12 months
The occurrence of surgical site infections was assessed as a critical indicator of postoperative morbidity. SSIs were monitored through clinical evaluations, including signs of redness, swelling, warmth, pain, and discharge at the surgical site, and were managed according to established guidelines.
Time frame: 24 months
The occurrence of surgical site infections was assessed as a critical indicator of postoperative morbidity. SSIs were monitored through clinical evaluations, including signs of redness, swelling, warmth, pain, and discharge at the surgical site, and were managed according to established guidelines.
Time frame: 1 months
Accumulation of fluid at the surgical site, confirmed through physical examination or imaging.
Time frame: 3 months
Accumulation of fluid at the surgical site, confirmed through physical examination or imaging.
Time frame: 6 months
Accumulation of fluid at the surgical site, confirmed through physical examination or imaging.
Time frame: 12 months
Accumulation of fluid at the surgical site, confirmed through physical examination or imaging.
Time frame: 24 months
Accumulation of fluid at the surgical site, confirmed through physical examination or imaging.
Time frame: 1 months
Localized blood collection near the surgical site, evaluated clinically or with imaging as needed.
Time frame: 3 months
Localized blood collection near the surgical site, evaluated clinically or with imaging as needed.
Time frame: 6 months
Localized blood collection near the surgical site, evaluated clinically or with imaging as needed.
Time frame: 12 months
Localized blood collection near the surgical site, evaluated clinically or with imaging as needed.
Time frame: 24 months
Localized blood collection near the surgical site, evaluated clinically or with imaging as needed.
Time frame: until 24 months
Abnormal fibrous connections between the bowel and mesh, potentially causing pain or obstruction.
Time frame: until 24 month
Displacement of the mesh from its intended position.
Time frame: until 24 months
Displacement of the mesh from its intended position.
Time frame: until 24 months
Episodes of bowel obstruction were recorded based on patient symptoms (e.g., abdominal distension, vomiting) and confirmed using imaging studies
Azienda Sanitaria Locale Napoli 2 Nord
Other
Laparoscopic Parastomal Hernia Repair Using the Sandwich Technique: A Multicenter Study of Clinical Outcomes, Recurrence Rates, and Quality of Life Improvements
Acronym: APOLLO
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01380860
Hernia, Parastomal Hernia
Besançon, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07064694
Hernia, Parastomal Hernia
Warsaw, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT03702478
Hernia, Parastomal Hernia
Copenhagen, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT00908661
Hernia, Parastomal Hernia
Barcelona, Spain
View Trial Details