Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04286243

Prevention of Cervical Cancer Through an HPV-based Screen-and-treat Strategy in Malawi

The purpose of the study is to determine the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of implementing new strategies to screen and treat eligible women for cervical cancer through a cluster randomized trial of two different models. Both models offer the same screening and treatment algorithm, but one will be based in Voluntary Family Planning (VFP) or other clinics and the second will be based in the community. Participants will be recruited from two districts in Malawi with the highest HIV prevalence in the country: Lilongwe in the Central Region and Zomba in the Southern Region.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Cervical cancer is largely preventable through screening and preventive therapy. This is a cluster randomized trial that will integrate a novel cervical cancer screen-and-treat algorithm into voluntary family planning (VFP) services via two different models aimed at reducing barriers to screening and treatment in resource limited settings. Model 1 involves: 1) cervico-vaginal self-sampling for high-risk HPV (hr-HPV) while waiting for appointments at the VFP clinic or other clinics, 2) same-day visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) for those women found to be hr-HPV-positive by rapid GeneXpert HPV testing, and 3) same-day thermocoagulation treatment for HPV-positive women who are eligible for ablative therapy by VIA. Model 2 will offer women the same services as in Model 1, but they will also be given the option to perform cervico-vaginal self-sampling in the community via Heath Surveillance Assistants (HSAs) who will bring their HPV sample to the clinic and notify them to return to the clinic for VIA and possible same-day thermocoagulation if their hr-HPV test is positive. Participants will be recruited from 16 high HIV-prevalence clinics in either Lilongwe in the Central Region or Zomba in the Southern Region. The broad objective of the project is to compare the effectiveness and budget impact of these two models for averting potential cervical cancer cases and to evaluate the implementation and acceptability of the models in multiple different health care facility settings.

A systematic Implementation Evaluation will be conducted throughout implementation of the assigned models at the study health facilities to determine the success/failure in the delivery of intervention packages. The study team will employ the following mixed method data collection assessments:

  • In-Depth Interviews with purposively selected healthcare facility staff and clients in the sampled facilities (N = approximately 60).
  • Focus group discussions (FGDs) with purposively selected in-clinic services providers and HSAs (N = approximately 160).
  • Structured weekly observations of service delivery by clinical mentors using an observation checklist, to observe providers and laboratorians adherence to standards, guidelines and intervention protocols.
  • Aggregate collection of routine quantitative service utilization data from adapted family planning and cervical cancer screening registers.
  • Implementation of assessment tools to assess changes in service providers' workload.
  • Client Exit Surveys with women in the catchment areas of the targeted facilities who received or declined family planning and/or cervical cancer screening services at the facility or in the community (N= approximately 1,000).
  • Time and motion studies to observe visits and staff time spent on counseling, screening and treatment procedures, and managing and testing specimens.

Finally, an Endline Household Survey will be completed among a random sample of women selected from all of the facilities' catchment areas (N= approximately 8,000). This survey will ask questions about basic demographic information, reproductive health information, HIV status, distance to the nearest health facility, prior VFP use, VFP use during project implementation, prior cervical cancer screening and preventive therapy (CCSPT) services received, and any CCSPT services received during project implementation.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Health care providers In-Depth Interviews (IDIs) and Focus Group Discussions:

  • Health care staff member must be currently working at one of the 16 health facilities selected for the study.

Client In-Depth Interviews:

  • Woman must have participated in cervical cancer screening via HPV self-sampling through one of the 16 health facilities during the study period.

Client Exit Surveys:

  • Woman who received or declined VFP and/or CCS services in the catchment area of the targeted facilities.

Endline Household survey:

  • Woman must be between the ages of 15-50 years.

Exclusion criteria

Endline Household survey:

  • Woman who has had her cervix removed.

Treatment and study plan

Community-based HPV screening strategy

Other

Offering HPV self-collection for cervical cancer screening in the community

Clinic-based HPV screening strategy

Other

Offering HPV self-collection for cervical cancer screening in the clinic

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of women who receive cervical cancer screening in Model 2

    Time frame: 12 months after model implementation

    Effectiveness of community-based cervical cancer screening as measured through Endline Household Surveys

  2. Proportion of women who receive family planning services in Model 2

    Time frame: 12 months after model implementation

    Effectiveness of integrating community-based cervical cancer screening into family planning services as measured through Endline Household Surveys

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of healthcare workers who report satisfaction with providing cervical cancer services

    Time frame: 12 months after model implementation

    Acceptability and feasibility of service provision as measured through routine assessments

  2. Proportion of healthcare workers who report satisfaction with providing family planning services

    Time frame: 12 months after model implementation

    Acceptability and feasibility of service provision as measured through routine assessments

  3. Proportion of clients who report satisfaction with cervical cancer services received at study facilities

    Time frame: 12 months after model implementation

    Acceptability and feasibility of cervical cancer screening and preventive therapy as measured through client exit surveys

  4. Proportion of clients who report satisfaction with family planning services received at study facilities

    Time frame: 12 months after model implementation

    Acceptability of family planning services as measured through client exit surveys

  5. Cost of the intervention

    Time frame: 12 months after model implementation

    The cost per client of adding cervical cancer screening and preventive therapy to voluntary family planning services in each model as measured through routine assessments and client exit surveys

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Other

Collaborators

  • United States Agency for International Development (USAID)

Registry information

Official study title

UNCPM 21904 - Prevention of Cervical Cancer Through an HPV-based Screen-and-treat Strategy in Malawi: a Cluster Randomized Trial

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Feb 26, 2020
Registry last updated
Nov 7, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.