Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033, United States
NCT Number: NCT01547637
The key objective of this study is to compare success rates of ultrasound guided obturator nerve block and anatomic landmark guided obturator nerve block as determined by neuromonitoring endpoints and surgeon observations.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me35 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033, United States
Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) is a urologic surgery used in the treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. A potential complication of this procedure is bladder rupture or injury secondary to adductor muscle contraction from obturator nerve stimulation. This risk is increased in resection of lateral wall tumors, as electrosurgical resection of these lesions is more likely to inadvertently stimulate the obturator nerve.
There are several mechanisms for preventing the obturator reflex. Pharmacologic paralysis can reliably inhibit thigh adduction. However, TURBT is often a short procedure that is not amendable to intermediate duration neuromuscular blocking medications. The use of succinylcholine is another option but is limited by its short duration of action which may not be adequate for the time needed to resect the tumor. Additionally, many patients have contraindications to the use of succinylcholine. Spinal anesthesia does not reliably prevent the obturator reflex.
Regional anesthesia is another potential treatment modality to prevent the obturator reflex during TURBT. Motor blockade of the obturator nerve will prevent this adduction in the event of inadvertent nerve stimulation. Peripheral blockade of the obturator nerve can be combined with either general or spinal anesthesia. Historically, obturator nerve block (ONB) has been considered a technically challenging procedure. Recently, however, successful ultrasound guided ONB techniques have been reported. To the best of our knowledge there has been no study to date comparing the effectiveness of ONB achieved by anatomic landmarks (with nerve stimulation) versus ultrasound guided ONB (with nerve stimulation) at preventing the obturator reflex during TURBT surgery.
The key objective of this study is to compare success rates of ultrasound guided obturator nerve block and anatomic guided obturator nerve block as determined by neuromonitoring endpoints and surgeon observations.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Peripheral obturator nerve block using 10 ml of 2% lidocaine
Other names: anatomic obturator block
Time frame: 1 day
Neuromonitoring technician will measure and record obturator nerve conduction velocity in pre-defined time intervals after performance of obturator nerve block.
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Other
Preventing the Obturator Nerve Reflex: A Comparison of Ultrasound Guided Obturator Nerve Block and Classic Anatomic Block Technique.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07129135
Abnormal Placentation, Bladder Injury
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06469125
Bladder Injury, Genital Diseases
Konya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07050082
Accreta, Placenta, Bladder Injury
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06278753
Bladder Injury, Complication of Surgical Procedure
Izmir, Eurasia, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details