Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06278753

Comparison of Standard Cystoscopy With Carbon Dioxide Cystoscopy

For the evaluation of the lower urinary tract after laparoscopic hysterectomy, routine standard saline cystoscopy and carbon dioxide cystoscopy will be compared.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Bladder Injury Complication of Surgical Procedure Intraoperative Complications Pathologic Processes Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms Surgical Injury Ureter Injury

Age range

18 year–90 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Tepecik Training and Research Hospital

Izmir, Eurasia, 35090, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

It was aimed to investigate whether routine cystoscopy with carbon dioxide is a safer and faster method for the evaluation of lower urinary tract injuries compared to standard saline cystoscopy. In addition, with this study, it will be studied whether bladder bleeding or intra-bladder masses can be evaluated more quickly and clearly.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign reasons planned patients
  • The operation will be performed in our hospital
  • Reporting preoperative endometrial and cervical samplings as benign
  • After discharge, control examinations will be carried out in our hospital.

Exclusion criteria

  • Abdominal, robotic or vaginal hysterectomies
  • malignant reporting of preoperative cervical and endometrial samplings
  • Patients do not want to participate in the study

Treatment and study plan

carbon dioxide cystoscopy

Diagnostic Test

Using carbon dioxide medium for filling bladder

Primary outcomes

  1. It was aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and reliability of carbon dioxide cystoscopy.

    Time frame: one year

Secondary outcomes

  1. It was aimed to evaluate the speed and image quality of carbon dioxide cystoscopy in detecting intravesical masses.

    Time frame: one year

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Tepecik Training and Research Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of Standard Cystoscopy With Carbon Dioxide Cystoscopy Used to Evaluate Lower Urinary Tract Damage After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Feb 26, 2024
Registry last updated
Feb 12, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.