Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03230227

Presternal Magnesium With Bupivacain Versus Bupivacain Only for Postoperative Pain Relief in Open Heart Surgery

Effective pain relief after cardiac surgery has assumed importance with the introduction of fast track discharge protocols that requires early weaning from mechanical ventilation. Inadequate pain control reduces the capacity to cough, mobility, increases the frequency of atelectasis, and prolongs recovery. Infiltration of local anesthetics near the surgical wound has shown to improve early postoperative pain in various surgical procedures.

Magnesium is the fourth most plentiful cation in our body. It has antinociceptive effects in animal and human models of pain.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Emad Zarief Kamel Said

Asyut, 71111, Egypt

About this study

Effective pain relief after cardiac surgery has assumed importance with the introduction of fast track discharge protocols that requires early weaning from mechanical ventilation. Inadequate pain control reduces the capacity to cough, mobility, increases the frequency of atelectasis, and prolongs recovery.

A major cause of pain after cardiac surgery is the median sternotomy particularly on the first two postoperative days.

The most often used analgesics in these patients are parenteral opioids which can lead to undesirable side-effects as sedation, respiratory depression, nausea, and vomiting.

Infiltration of local anesthetics near the surgical wound has shown to improve early postoperative pain in various surgical procedures.

Magnesium is the fourth most plentiful cation in our body. It has antinociceptive effects in animal and human models of pain.

It has been mentioned in a systematic review that it may be worthwhile to further study the role of supplemental magnesium in providing perioperative analgesia, because this is a relatively harmless molecule, is not expensive and also because the biological basis for its potential antinociceptive effect is promising.

These effects are primarily based on physiological calcium antagonism, that is voltage-dependent regulation of calcium influx into the cell, and noncompetitive antagonism of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors.

there is a need to evaluate and compare local magnesium with bupivacaine , in comparison to bupivacain

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18-60 years old
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status II and III
  • Patients scheduled for open heart surgery with sternotomy

Exclusion criteria

  • - Emergency surgery
  • Clinically significant kidney or liver disease
  • Patients allergic to local anesthetic
  • Patients with prolonged CPB time (>120 min)
  • Patients required intra-aortic balloon pump

Treatment and study plan

Bupivacaine magnesium

Drug

bupivacain 0.125% magnesium sulfate 5%) infusion in the presternum , for 48 hours

Bupivacaine Only

Drug

bupivacaine 0.125% infusion in the presternum , for 48 hours

Primary outcomes

  1. postoperative pain

    Time frame: 2 days

    assessing VAS scale

Secondary outcomes

  1. hemodynamics

    Time frame: 24 hours

    mean arterial blood pressure

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Assiut University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Presternal Local Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Relief After Open Heart Surgery

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2017
First posted
Jul 26, 2017
Registry last updated
Nov 24, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.