Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1090 HM, Netherlands
NCT Number: NCT03462134
In this study the investigators examined the ability of orthopaedic surgeons to predict the outcome of surgery and non-operative treatment in patients (age 45 to 70) with a non-obstructive meniscal tear.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me45 year–70 year
All sexes
Observational
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1090 HM, Netherlands
The additional benefits of Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy (APM) in middle aged patients with a non-obstructive meniscal tear are under scrutiny for years. Despite the most recent publications recommending to apply non-operative treatment (exercise therapy, injections, drugs) instead of APM in this patient group, the expected decrease in number of operations is slower then expected. Orthopaedic surgeons therefore seem unconvinced by the evidence to change practice.
For this reason the investigators conducted an international survey amongst orthopaedic surgeons in which the investigators aimed to (1) determine the ability of orthopaedic surgeons to predict the outcomes of APM and physical therapy (PT) in middle aged patients with a non-obstructive meniscal tear, and (2) to determine which patient factors direct surgeons towards APM and towards PT.
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
In this survey the investigators invited orthopaedic surgeons and residents from both the Netherlands and Australia to complete a meniscus survey, including a random sample of patients from the Escape trial. The in-/exclusion criteria are listed below.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Survey amongst orthopaedic surgeons
Time frame: 2 years
In this survey, participants are provided with 20 cases and asked for their treatment of choice (APM or physical therapy). Subsequently, participants are asked for the expected outcome, which is change in knee function on the International Knee Documentation Committee 'Subjective Knee Form' (IKDC).
These data are used to assess to what extend orthopaedic surgeons are capable of predicting the outcome of surgical and non-operative treatment of meniscal tears in a random sample of patients from the Escape trial.
Time frame: 2 years
In this survey, participants are asked to choose from a list of patient specific factors, which of these direct their treatment choice toward APM, and which towards non-operative treatment.
These data are used to examine which patient specific factors are directing orthopaedic surgeons towards APM and towards PT. These factors will help future research focusing in creating patient specific profiles.
Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis
Other
Can Orthopaedic Surgeons Predict the Outcome of Treatment in Patients With Meniscal Tears? The Results of an International Survey.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07476508
Knee Injuries, Leg Injuries
Bydgoszcz, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT03968029
Meniscus Lesion
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT06475963
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
Bologna, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT04153643
Meniscus Lesion
Amherst, New York, United States
View Trial Details