Camila Torriani
São Paulo, 02415000, Brazil
NCT Number: NCT00604747
Background: The literature indicates that, in relation to motor learning, healthy subjects benefit more from random practice than from constant practice. However, this effect is not well known in post-stroke patients. Objective: The goal of this study was to investigate the effects of practice structure on motor learning in post-stroke patients. Methods: Participants included an experimental group (EG) of post-stroke patients: 17 males and females; and a control group (CG) of healthy individuals: 17 males and females. At the acquisition phase, all participants performed 30 trials of a coincident timing task. Nine individuals from each group practiced constantly (C) at a stimulus propagation speed of 3 mph, and eight from each group practiced randomly (R) at speeds of 2, 3, and 5 mph. Subsequent phases included: 1) transfer, 2) retention after 15 minutes, and 3) retention after 3 days. Each of these phases included 20 trials: 10 at a speed of 1 mph, and 10 at a speed of 4 mph. Intra- and inter-group comparisons were made employing an alpha level of 0.05 (5%).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me40 year–62 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
São Paulo, 02415000, Brazil
Utilized was Bassin's anticipation timer (Lafayette Instruments #50575), which is comprised of a control screen, one 1.52 m gutter with 32 diodes placed on it linearly, and a response button. The screen has a digital display, with commands that permit the operator to control the stimulus propagation speed and the preparatory interval speed. Once activated, the screen exhibits an alert signal, and, after the preparatory interval, it initiates the propagation of a luminous stimulus, lighting the 32 diodes successively. The task required participants to press the response button simultaneously with the illumination of the last diode. The digital display showed the error measure (em): that is, the difference between the illumination of the last diode and the response.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
there were 2 groups which received random practice and constant practice during acquisition phase
Other names: experimental group (EG), control group (CG)
Time frame: time in miliseconds
University of Sao Paulo
Other
The Effects of Practice Structure on Motor Learning in Post-Stroke Patients
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07336667
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Seoul, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT07685691
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Adana, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07475598
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Ankara, YENIMAHALLE, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07615569
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial Details