Superion® Indirect Decompression System (IDS)
DeviceSuperion® Indirect Decompression System (IDS) (Superion® implant)
NCT Number: NCT04087811
To gather evidence documenting the performance and clinical outcomes associated with treatment of moderate degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis using the Superion® Indirect Decompression System (IDS).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me45 year and older
All sexes
Observational
(ACT) Alabama Clinical Therapeutics, LLC, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
To gather evidence documenting the performance and clinical outcomes associated with treatment of moderate degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis using the Superion® IDS in patients ≥45 years of age suffering from symptoms of neurogenic intermittent claudication secondary to a confirmed diagnosis of moderate degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis at one or two contiguous levels from L1 to L5.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Superion® Indirect Decompression System (IDS) (Superion® implant)
Time frame: 3 Week Follow-Up Visit
Percentage of patients reporting satisfied or somewhat satisfied with treatment during study follow up was calculated.
Patients chose one of the following options to describe their overall satisfaction with their treatment (1) Satisfied (2) Somewhat Satisfied (3) Somewhat Dissatisfied (4) Dissatisfied. The percentage of patients who reported (1) Satisfied or (2) Somewhat satisfied were included and calculated in the analysis. Maximum is 100% of patients reported being satisfied and minimum is 0%.
Time frame: 6 Month Follow-Up Visit
Percentage of patients reporting satisfied or somewhat satisfied with treatment during study follow up was calculated.
Patients chose one of the following options to describe their overall satisfaction with their treatment (1) Satisfied (2) Somewhat Satisfied (3) Somewhat Dissatisfied (4) Dissatisfied. The percentage of patients who reported (1) Satisfied or (2) Somewhat satisfied were included and calculated in the analysis. Maximum is 100% of patients reported being satisfied and minimum is 0%.
Time frame: 12 Month Follow-Up Visit
Percentage of patients reporting satisfied or somewhat satisfied with treatment during study follow up was calculated.
Patients chose one of the following options to describe their overall satisfaction with their treatment (1) Satisfied (2) Somewhat Satisfied (3) Somewhat Dissatisfied (4) Dissatisfied. The percentage of patients who reported (1) Satisfied or (2) Somewhat satisfied were included and calculated in the analysis. Maximum is 100% of patients reported being satisfied and minimum is 0%.
Boston Scientific Corporation
Industry
Acronym: PRESS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04250753
Bone Diseases, Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07562035
Bone Diseases, Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07001982
Bone Diseases, Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Karabük, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06959355
Bone Diseases, Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Karabük, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details