Motor Behavior Laboratory, University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, 32611, United States
NCT Number: NCT00369668
The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of two amounts of treatment therapy on post stroke motor recovery in the arms. The therapy is bilateral movement training combined with electrical stimulation on the impaired limb.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me44 year–86 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Gainesville, Florida, 32611, United States
Intense movement training (practice) with the affected arm after stroke has the potential to improve upper extremity (UE) function resulting from neuroplasticity changes in the motor cortex. However, the necessary and sufficient parameters of this therapy in humans have not been fully investigated. Delineation of the most efficacious and efficient therapy for promoting UE recovery post-stroke is necessary before effective clinical implementation of this therapy. The current compared the effects on motor function impairments for three bilateral movement groups involving two doses of treatment (i.e., bilateral training coupled with neuromuscular electrical stimulation) and a sham control. During the subacute recovery phase (3 - 6 months), patients who meet motor capabilities criteria will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: (a) low intensity: 90 minutes/session, 2 sessions/week 2 weeks; bilateral movement training coupled with active neuromuscular stimulation on the impaired wrist/fingers; (b) high intensity: 90 minutes/session, 4 sessions/week for 2 weeks; bilateral movement training coupled with active stimulation on the impaired wrist/finger extensors; and (c) control group (sham active stimulation). Patients' UE motor capabilities were assessed before treatment therapy began (pretest) and within the first week after the treatment therapy ended (posttest).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants practice moving their paretic arm at the same time as they move their non-paretic arm in the same movement patterns. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation triggered by the participants' own contracting muscles is provided to the paretic arm during the movements. Training period was 4 times per week for 2 weeks.
Other names: functional electrical stimulation
Participants practice moving both their paretic and non-paretic arms at the same time in the same movement patterns. Sham electrical stimulation (low level electrical stimulation that can be felt but is insufficient to trigger a muscle contraction) is provided to the paretic arm during the movement. Training period was 2 times per week for 2 weeks.
Other names: functional electrical stimulation - sham
Time frame: Baseline/pretest; posttest given between days 17-22 (posttest days 3 -8)
A 60 second timed hand/arm manipulation test in which participants reach, grasp, lift, and release a 1" x 1" block of wood. They must lift a block from one side of a box, carry it over a low barrier and release the block into the other side of the box.
Time frame: Baseline/pretest; posttest given between days 17-22 (posttest days 3 -8)
FM motor test assesses functional impairments post stroke as participants attempt various movements from daily activities. Minimum score = 0; maximum score = 66; lower scores indicate more impairments and higher scores indicate less impairments.
Time frame: Baseline/pretest; posttest given between days 17-22 (posttest days 3-8)
Premotor reaction times in milliseconds were recorded for the impaired arm of each participant in the three intervention (arm) groups. Premotor reaction time represents central processes. Lower times are faster reaction times, indicating less time to initiate a movement.
University of Florida
Other
Subacute Stroke Recovery (Upper Extremity Motor Function): Bimanual Coordination Training
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01072461
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Newark, New Jersey, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00735033
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
View Trial DetailsNCT00084292
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06107010
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Créteil, France
View Trial Details