Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01072461

Optimizing Hand Rehabilitation Post-Stroke Using Interactive Virtual Environments

The complexity of sensorimotor control required for hand function as well as the wide range of recovery of manipulative abilities makes rehabilitation of the hand most challenging. The investigators past work has shown that training in a virtual environment (VE) using repetitive, adaptive algorithms has the potential to be an effective rehabilitation medium to facilitate motor recovery of hand function. These findings are in accordance with current neuroscience literature in animals and motor control literature in humans. The investigators are now in a position to refine and optimize elements of the training paradigms to enhance neuroplasticity. The investigators first aim tests if and how competition among body parts for neural representations stifles functional gains from different types of training regimens. The second aim tests the functional benefits of unilateral versus bilateral training regimens.The third aim tests whether functional improvements gained from training in a virtual environment transfer to other (untrained) skills in the real world.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 1

Primary location

New Jersey Institute of Technology

Newark, New Jersey, 07102, United States

About this study

The complexity of sensorimotor control required for hand function as well as the wide range of recovery of manipulative abilities makes rehabilitation of the hand most challenging. The investigators past work has shown that training in a virtual environment (VE) using repetitive, adaptive algorithms has the potential to be an effective rehabilitation medium to facilitate motor recovery of hand function. These findings are in accordance with current neuroscience literature in animals and motor control literature in humans. The investigators are now in a position to refine and optimize elements of the training paradigms to enhance neuroplasticity. The investigators first aim tests if and how competition among body parts for neural representations stifles functional gains from different types of training regimens. The second aim tests the functional benefits of unilateral versus bilateral training regimens.The third aim tests whether functional improvements gained from training in a virtual environment transfer to other (untrained) skills in the real world.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Six months post cerebrovascular accident
  • Residual upper extremity impairment that affects participation
  • At least ten degrees of active finger extension
  • Tolerate passive shoulder flexion to chest level

Exclusion criteria

  • Severe neglect
  • Severe aphasia

Treatment and study plan

HAS Training

Behavioral

Robotically measured and facilitated training of the hemiparetic hand and arm in isolation, in a three dimensional haptically rendered virtual environment.

Other names: Isolated UE training

HAT training

Behavioral

Robotically measured and facilitated training of the hemiparetic hand and arm as an integrated functional unit, in a three dimensional haptically rendered virtual environment

Other names: Integrated UE training

bimanual training

Behavioral

Robotically measured and facilitated training of the hemiparetic hand and non-hemiparetic hand together, in a three dimensional haptically rendered virtual environment

Other names: Bilateral UE training

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Jebsen Test of Hand Function

    Time frame: Two Weeks Prior to Training, Immediately Prior to Training, Immediately After Training, 3 Months After Training

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Wolf Motor Function Test

    Time frame: Two Weeks Prior to Training, Immediately Prior to Training, Immediately After Training, 3 Months After Training

  2. Change in 9 Hole Peg Test

    Time frame: Two Weeks Prior to Training, Immediately Prior to Training, Immediately After Training, 3 Months After Training

  3. Change in Box and Blocks Test

    Time frame: Two Weeks Prior to Training, Immediately Prior to Training, Immediately After Training, 3 Months After Training

  4. Change in Robotically Collected Kinematics

    Time frame: 1 day before training and 1 day after training

  5. Change in Reach to Grasp Test

    Time frame: 1 day before training and 1 day after training

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

New Jersey Institute of Technology

Other

Collaborators

  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2015
First posted
Feb 22, 2010
Registry last updated
Oct 7, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.